Flagbearer Race: Kwabena Agyapong's campaign team reacts to GH¢4m development fee

Read Comments Comments (8)

• Nyafunyafu 2 months ago

  Money swine. These useless NPP thieves stole a lot. The tax payers money

  Money swine. These useless NPP thieves stole a lot. The tax payers money

  reply
• prophet mohammed was a sick dog 2 months ago

  Say no to islam and convert to a real religion.
  Allah is satanic scum and qur'an is toilet paper...........Search online for ways to move away from evil islam. You can join ex-muslim groups online and be safe........ ...
  read full comment

  Say no to islam and convert to a real religion.
  Allah is satanic scum and qur'an is toilet paper...........Search online for ways to move away from evil islam. You can join ex-muslim groups online and be safe................you are not alone.

  reply
• Alan Gyimi Gyimi Kyeremanteng 2 months ago

  I TOLD U NPP = NKWASIAFUO PEOPLES PARTY. UMOUFIA CARTOONS CONCERT CATHEDRAL

  I TOLD U NPP = NKWASIAFUO PEOPLES PARTY. UMOUFIA CARTOONS CONCERT CATHEDRAL

  reply
• GHANA 2 months ago

  BREAKING NEWS !!!!!!!!!!!!
  THE YOUTH WITHOUT PARTY COLORS
  'Comparative Analysis of the NPP Governments under John Agyekum Kufuor and Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo
  
  In recent years, politically unaffiliated youth in Ghana ha ...
  read full comment

  BREAKING NEWS !!!!!!!!!!!!
  THE YOUTH WITHOUT PARTY COLORS
  'Comparative Analysis of the NPP Governments under John Agyekum Kufuor and Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo
  
  In recent years, politically unaffiliated youth in Ghana have increasingly sought to critically examine the contrasting leadership orientations of the two New Patriotic Party (NPP) governments — those led by President John Agyekum Kufuor (2001–2009) and President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo (2017–2024). Although both administrations emerge from the same political tradition, they exhibit distinct approaches to governance, cabinet composition, and policy implementation.
  
  President Kufuor’s administration is widely recognized for its reliance on technocratic expertise, intellectual competence, and experience. His cabinet included professionals from diverse fields such as economics, law, education, and international relations, reflecting his belief in meritocratic governance and evidence-based policy design (Boafo-Arthur, 2007). Kufuor’s leadership philosophy emphasized institutional capacity-building, macroeconomic stability, and good governance. Notably, his government pursued policies such as the Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative and the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), which contributed to fiscal consolidation and social welfare expansion (Aryeetey & Kanbur, 2008).
  
  In contrast, President Akufo-Addo’s government is often characterized by its emphasis on trust, loyalty, and personal relationships. Several of his appointees are long-time allies, relatives, or individuals with deep political loyalty to the President and the NPP. This approach, while fostering internal cohesion and political loyalty, has been criticized for limiting technocratic diversity and promoting perceptions of nepotism (Ayee, 2021). Nonetheless, Akufo-Addo’s administration has also demonstrated strong political will in implementing ambitious flagship initiatives such as the Free Senior High School (Free SHS) policy and the One District, One Factory (1D1F) industrialization programme (Obeng-Odoom, 2020).
  
  However, any fair comparison between the two administrations must acknowledge their distinct historical and global contexts. Kufuor’s presidency coincided with a period of relative international stability and robust global economic growth, while Akufo-Addo’s tenure has been marked by severe external shocks, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, both of which significantly disrupted global supply chains and domestic fiscal balance (World Bank, 2023). These external crises have compounded Ghana’s macroeconomic challenges, leading to inflationary pressures, currency depreciation, and a resurgence of debt distress.
  
  In conclusion, while both leaders share the ideological foundation of the NPP — emphasizing liberal economic policies, private sector development, and democratic consolidation — their administrations diverge in leadership orientation and governance philosophy. Kufuor’s government can be described as technocratically driven and institutionally oriented, whereas Akufo-Addo’s administration appears loyalty-driven and relationship-oriented. A comprehensive assessment of their performances must therefore consider not only leadership style but also the broader domestic and global contexts that shaped their respective tenures.

  reply
• NPP IS A PART OF CRIMINALS 2 months ago

  NPP i s party of criminals

  NPP i s party of criminals

  reply
• LUNCH PAD 2 months ago

  MR AGYAPONG, GO AND PAY. TO MAKES A LEADER FOR PRESIDENT IS A JOKE. THAT WHY ADDAI NIMO WITHDRAW. OTHERWISE YOU WILL BE A SERIAL PRESIDENTIAL COMPETITOR

  MR AGYAPONG, GO AND PAY. TO MAKES A LEADER FOR PRESIDENT IS A JOKE. THAT WHY ADDAI NIMO WITHDRAW. OTHERWISE YOU WILL BE A SERIAL PRESIDENTIAL COMPETITOR

  reply
• Arrow 2 months ago

  This banku lulu and gyimigyimi should give us a break. He thinks becoming a flag bearer is easy like tearing underage girls panties. Buluuuuu!

  This banku lulu and gyimigyimi should give us a break. He thinks becoming a flag bearer is easy like tearing underage girls panties. Buluuuuu!

  reply
• BB 2 months ago

  I am not npp, but I think Kwabena Agyapong is the finest candidate amongst all.

  I am not npp, but I think Kwabena Agyapong is the finest candidate amongst all.

  reply