Menu › ›

Was Mamah really offside? Disallowed Kotoko goal sparks debate

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (12)

  • Dan 1 month ago

    Poor officiating. It was not off side.

  • Alien 1 month ago

    Watch his leg. He was offside

  • Kwadwo 1 month ago

    You need to head to Specsavers then

  • Dan 1 month ago

    Poor officiating. It was not off side.

  • Kojo 1 month ago

    The leg if am right was ahead of the last Hearts player

  • Alien 1 month ago

    Stupid article. How is the decision controversial?

  • Kwadwo 1 month ago

    He was onside

  • Papykwabee 1 month ago

    He was clearly onside. The first Kotoko player was offside, but he wasn’t involved in the action. Mahma was well onside ,two Hearts of Oak players were covering him.

  • CUSTOM has LAUNCHED an online AUCTION of seized VEHICLES , giving everyone in AFRICA the CHANCE to own a VEHICLE at an affordable price. DISTANCES is no OBSTACLE SHIPPING takes place IMMEDIATELY after the order is PLACED . 1 month ago

    A TRIAL WILL CONVINCES YOU
    
    SOME CAR LIST BELOW.
    Golf 3K GHS __ 5K GHS
    
    TOKUNBO CARS BELOW :�
    
    Mitsubishi L200 60,000 GH ...
    read full comment

  • Truth 1 month ago

    Complete goal. The Hearts defenders were caught ball watching. Poor marking

  • Abacha 1 month ago

    It wasn't offside. The referee erred.

  • Gnaby 1 month ago

    At this modern era of football look at the football stadium and pitch even the camera quality is even bad.Ghana nothing is working in this village