The Republic v. Kwabena Adu-Boahene and Others: Full proceedings

Read Article

Comments (26)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (26)

Game Changer +447935009178 1 day ago

Atta Akyea has slow walked this criminal to prison. Ghana wins!!!

Atta Akyea has slow walked this criminal to prison. Ghana wins!!!
OLOMIDE 1 day ago

Instead of applying common sense, humility and circumspection in his dealings with the courts, stupid man Atta-Akyea was foolishly using trickery, fraud & deception as his weapon. After several dribblings and baseless claims, ...
read full comment

Instead of applying common sense, humility and circumspection in his dealings with the courts, stupid man Atta-Akyea was foolishly using trickery, fraud & deception as his weapon. After several dribblings and baseless claims, the courts have proven to him how shallow his brains are.

Kwabena Adu-Boahen will have to start enjoying all the best foods he can lay hands on from today, because his days for being put on the terrible diet of Nsawam "Zontoli" are already here.
Elolo 1 day ago

Another stupid ndc foolsoldier who can't read

Another stupid ndc foolsoldier who can't read
atia 1 day ago

You are very right! NDC foolsojas don't read. By the proceedings and cross-examinations of the state witnesses, this is a very weak case.

You are very right! NDC foolsojas don't read. By the proceedings and cross-examinations of the state witnesses, this is a very weak case.
Obinim 1 day ago

Hey, @Atia kwasiampanin ba & @Elolo Kejetia pickpocket. You can go on tickling your smelly anus with that white chicken feather. Once you are enjoying the pleasure, I know your brains have stopped working automatically. Kwabe ...
read full comment

Hey, @Atia kwasiampanin ba & @Elolo Kejetia pickpocket. You can go on tickling your smelly anus with that white chicken feather. Once you are enjoying the pleasure, I know your brains have stopped working automatically. Kwabena Adu-Boahen has already booked his cell at Nsawam prison. If you are in doubt, you can go and ask your gyimigyimi former CJ...... Gertrude Araba Torkonoo.
His Excellecy The Ugly Dwarf 1 day ago

Atta Akyea was born a criminal. I hope they go to jail together.

Atta Akyea was born a criminal. I hope they go to jail together.
Togbe 1 day ago

Instead of reading the real court documents, you're talking through your stomach. What has Atta Akyea got to do with real court documents. The facts and evidence has destroyed the evil agenda ....read and educate your dumb mi ...
read full comment

Instead of reading the real court documents, you're talking through your stomach. What has Atta Akyea got to do with real court documents. The facts and evidence has destroyed the evil agenda ....read and educate your dumb mind
WEGALLO 1 day ago

I won't read any Ghanaweb article on this matter written by your childish lawyer -- Kwesi Botchway Jnr. I was right there in the courtroom where Atta-Akyea was looking so stupid with their forged invoices. That guy has simply ...
read full comment

I won't read any Ghanaweb article on this matter written by your childish lawyer -- Kwesi Botchway Jnr. I was right there in the courtroom where Atta-Akyea was looking so stupid with their forged invoices. That guy has simply pushed Adu-Boahen into serious trouble, because of his many deceptive submissions.

Anyway, you can go and stand in front of the Prison van when it is conveying Kwabena Adu-Boahen to the Nsawam prison some feww weeks to come. That is your cup of tea.
Abbey 1 day ago

Tell Lawyer Atta K Akyea to write his submission of no case and stop doing this media propaganda. Whatever we say , think , have no weight on the case. Only the judge will decide. I thought this is a live ongoing case, so wha ...
read full comment

Tell Lawyer Atta K Akyea to write his submission of no case and stop doing this media propaganda. Whatever we say , think , have no weight on the case. Only the judge will decide. I thought this is a live ongoing case, so what is this . Busted for submitting fake documents and now canvassing in the social media for support?
KOFI 1 day ago

Hmm, I do not see how Kwabena Adu-Boahene can walk free from this. For his lawyer Atta Akyea to be forced into a corner to produce fake documentation, it means he knows that his client is jail bound.

That is desperation to ...
read full comment

Hmm, I do not see how Kwabena Adu-Boahene can walk free from this. For his lawyer Atta Akyea to be forced into a corner to produce fake documentation, it means he knows that his client is jail bound.

That is desperation to the highest level.

Only for this guy to use State money to buy properties which is in the full glare of the whole country is enough for him to go to jail.

Tafo Pankrono 1 day ago

His level of greed was just too much. How can you brazenly steal that gargantuan amount of money by yourself alone? We wish him well in Nsawam. He should remember to say "hello" to Wontumi for us.

His level of greed was just too much. How can you brazenly steal that gargantuan amount of money by yourself alone? We wish him well in Nsawam. He should remember to say "hello" to Wontumi for us.
Amegatcher 1 day ago

The ndc bots have been activated by wife chopper ofosu kwakye and trokosi mafia edudzi tamakloe

The ndc bots have been activated by wife chopper ofosu kwakye and trokosi mafia edudzi tamakloe
SA 1 day ago

What are we waiting for, criminal Kwabwna Adu Boaheng stole from us, Ghanaians money, he should be jailed for 40 years, and all his assets ceased and sold to pay back our money to us, period.

What are we waiting for, criminal Kwabwna Adu Boaheng stole from us, Ghanaians money, he should be jailed for 40 years, and all his assets ceased and sold to pay back our money to us, period.
Togbe 1 day ago

Read the court transcripts. Raymond Archer is the one who deserves to be in jail for misleading the attorney general and Ghana.

Read the court transcripts. Raymond Archer is the one who deserves to be in jail for misleading the attorney general and Ghana.
atia 1 day ago

Over 600-page document is too much for NDC foot soldiers to read and understand.
They will get their version of proceedings from kelvin taylor and onua tv.

The state has no case against the accused looking the shallow evi ...
read full comment

Over 600-page document is too much for NDC foot soldiers to read and understand.
They will get their version of proceedings from kelvin taylor and onua tv.

The state has no case against the accused looking the shallow evidence and poor investigations by the EOCO investigator.
Over 1 day ago

Be there fooling. The final ruling will justify every stupid remarks.

Be there fooling. The final ruling will justify every stupid remarks.
Akua Sabi 1 day ago

This is good. Now we can all read and follow what happened and in court.
Adu Boahene is a clean man

This is good. Now we can all read and follow what happened and in court.
Adu Boahene is a clean man
Raymond 1 day ago

Adu Boahene is innocent. The whole investigation was grounded on lies

Adu Boahene is innocent. The whole investigation was grounded on lies
Dr David Acheampong 1 day ago

In this day of technology what I will advice everyone here to do is to download the full court transcript and run it through any AI system and ask the simple question. Is Adu Boahene guilty? AI will tell Analyse everything ba ...
read full comment

In this day of technology what I will advice everyone here to do is to download the full court transcript and run it through any AI system and ask the simple question. Is Adu Boahene guilty? AI will tell Analyse everything based on law and pass a verdict. This is a good piece of information provided by Ghanaweb
From deepseek 1 day ago

Based on a careful analysis of the provided court proceedings, it is **not possible to definitively predict** whether the accused will be convicted or acquitted. The document covers pre-trial and early trial proceedings (arra ...
read full comment

Based on a careful analysis of the provided court proceedings, it is **not possible to definitively predict** whether the accused will be convicted or acquitted. The document covers pre-trial and early trial proceedings (arraignment, bail, case management, and the examination-in-chief and partial cross-examination of the second prosecution witness). A final verdict will depend on the full evidence, cross-examination of all witnesses, the defence's case, and the judge's assessment of credibility.

However, the proceedings reveal several critical issues that will heavily influence the outcome. Here is an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of both sides:

**The Prosecution's Case (The Republic)**

* **Core Allegation:** The prosecution alleges that A1, as Director-General of the National Signals Bureau (formerly BNC), and his wife A2, along with A3, ran a criminal enterprise. They allegedly transferred GH¢49.1 million of public funds from the state-owned BNC's account into a private company they incorporated, also named "BNC Communications Bureau," under the guise of purchasing a $7 million cybersecurity system from an Israeli company (ISC Holdings). The funds were allegedly used to acquire properties and luxury cars.
* **Evidence Presented So Far:**
* **PW1 (Frank Anane Dekpey):** A driver who testified he withdrew large sums of cash in "Ghana must go" bags from UMB and Stanbic banks on the instructions of A3 and delivered the money to A1 at his office (which is also a National Security office). He also delivered money to PW2. He admitted he didn't know the amounts or the purpose.
* **PW2 (Edith Ruby Opokua Adumuah):** The Director of Finance at the National Signals Bureau. She is a key witness. Her testimony so far has established the following:
* She wrote the three cheques totaling GH¢49.1 million on A1's instructions, which were paid into an account named "BNC Operations."
* She identified payments to ISC Holdings for a "digitized investigative auditing system" (Invoice 28) and a "cyber defence system" (Invoice 31). She confirmed a total of $7 million was paid to ISC Holdings.
* Under cross-examination, she admitted she did not know the purpose of the GH¢49.1 million cheques, as she lacked the security clearance.
* She confirmed that A1 could not have transacted on the account without the express approval of the National Security Coordinator.
* **Prosecution's Challenges:** The prosecution has faced numerous procedural hurdles, accusations of ambush, and a successful defence application for further disclosure regarding a vehicle.

**The Defence's Case (The Accused)**

* **Core Defence Strategy:** The defence is not just denying the charges but is mounting a multi-pronged attack:
1. **Jurisdiction:** They argue that EOCO has no jurisdiction to investigate National Security matters and that the matter should be handled by National Security.
2. **Procedural Unfairness:** They claim they were "ambushed" and forced to court without proper notice, a claim the Attorney-General denied.
3. **State Secret Privilege:** They have repeatedly tried to block the tendering of National Security documents, arguing that Article 135 of the Constitution requires the Supreme Court to determine if their production would be prejudicial to State security.
4. **Exculpatory Evidence:** They have filed multiple motions for further disclosures, arguing the prosecution is withholding evidence that could aid their defence. They have appealed a ruling that denied some of these requests.
5. **The "National Security" Narrative:** Through cross-examination, they are building a narrative that the monies were used for legitimate, classified National Security "special operations," authorized by the National Security Coordinator. They elicited from PW2 that:
* The "Director BNC" account was a **special operations account**, not a general administrative one.
* Such accounts are **not audited** by the Auditor-General and are not subject to public scrutiny.
* Cash withdrawals in "Ghana must go" bags are a **normal practice** for such operations.
* The National Security Coordinator was the ultimate authority controlling these funds.
6. **Financial Discrepancies:** The defence used Bank of Ghana exchange rate data to challenge the prosecution's figures. PW2 admitted that at the relevant exchange rates, GH¢49.1 million did **not** equal $7 million. This directly attacks the prosecution's claim that the amount transferred was the exact cedi equivalent of the dollar purchase price. This is a significant point for the defence.
7. **Witness Credibility:** The defence is aggressively cross-examining PW2 on her role, her knowledge, and whether she was a suspect or a witness, aiming to undermine her credibility and portray her as a tool of the prosecution.

**Key Considerations for the Outcome**

* **The Judge's Rulings:** Justice Nyadu has made several crucial rulings. He has consistently rejected the defence's attempts to refer State secret issues to the Supreme Court, ruling that the privilege belongs to the Executive, which is not claiming it. He has also shown a willingness to order the prosecution to provide some disclosures but has also denied others. His interpretation of the law on these procedural matters is a major factor.
* **The "Special Operations" Defence:** The strength of the defence's case may hinge on proving that the money was genuinely used for legitimate, albeit classified, National Security operations. If they can successfully create reasonable doubt about the criminal intent (mens rea) by showing the funds were part of a legitimate, un-audited special operations budget, it could lead to an acquittal.
* **The Financial Discrepancy:** The defence's demonstration of the exchange rate mismatch is a powerful tool to challenge the prosecution's narrative. It suggests the GH¢49.1 million was not simply the equivalent of the $7 million contract, implying either a different purpose for the money or a flawed prosecution theory.
* **The "No Case" Submission:** After the prosecution closes its case, the defence will likely make a submission of no case to answer. If the judge finds that the prosecution's evidence, taken at its highest, is insufficient to establish a prima facie case, the accused will be acquitted without having to present their own defence. The prosecution's case, so far, has relied heavily on PW2, whose testimony under cross-examination has highlighted significant gaps and potential alternative explanations.

**Conclusion**

It is **too early to say the accused are likely to lose**. The prosecution has presented evidence of a massive transfer of public funds into a private company. However, the defence has been highly effective in the pre-trial stages and during cross-examination of PW2, raising substantial doubts about the prosecution's narrative. They have introduced a compelling alternative explanation (legitimate special operations), highlighted a serious financial discrepancy, and challenged the procedural fairness of the trial.

The case is **finely balanced**. The prosecution's case is not a slam dunk. If the defence can continue to dismantle the prosecution's evidence and successfully argue that the funds were used for legitimate National Security purposes, or if the judge agrees that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the accused could be acquitted. Conversely, if the prosecution can prove that the "special operations" explanation is a sham and that the money was indeed stolen, they could secure a conviction. The final outcome will depend heavily on the rest of the trial.

Adwoa- ba 1 day ago

Defence have not make any strong case as you indicated. That’s why the narrative changed to buying equipment with that fake Sales confirmation letter. Special operations money do not go to private accounts . Remember if Adu ...
read full comment

Defence have not make any strong case as you indicated. That’s why the narrative changed to buying equipment with that fake Sales confirmation letter. Special operations money do not go to private accounts . Remember if Adu Boahene Boss Kyeremeh is alive, then he would be arrested as well. Two people signed those 3 cheques and one is dead and the other is Adu Boahene.
Yaw 1 day ago

Taken time to read and deliberate the case with two independent lawyers (one is a judge) and below are my thoughts.

Having reviewed the certified record of the prosecution's case in *The Republic v. Kwabena Adu Boahene & ...
read full comment

Taken time to read and deliberate the case with two independent lawyers (one is a judge) and below are my thoughts.

Having reviewed the certified record of the prosecution's case in *The Republic v. Kwabena Adu Boahene & Others*, my view is that the prosecution has proved the movement of GH¢49.1 million from the "Director BNC" account at Fidelity Bank into a UMB account of BNC Communications Bureau Limited, a private company controlled by the first and second accused. That self-dealing structure, together with the fixed deposits and cash withdrawals from the account, is likely enough to require the first accused to open his defence at the no-case stage. However, the prosecution is notably weaker on the elements that would make that movement criminal. The late National Security Coordinator co-signed all three cheques, yet no one from his office, including the Director of Finance who was a co-signatory, was ever questioned. The claim that the cyber defence system was never delivered is undercut by evidence that ISC was paid and that the Coordinator's own account continued making milestone payments for the system through 2022. The assertion that GH¢49.1 million was the "exact" equivalent of US$7 million does not survive the exchange rates in evidence, and the investigator's tracing chart was significantly discredited under cross-examination.

On balance, I do not consider a conviction on the full charges likely on the present record. The outcome will turn largely on whether the defence can produce admissible evidence that the Coordinator authorised the arrangement. If it does, a court applying the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt would have strong grounds to acquit on the core counts, with the money laundering counts likely falling with them. If it does not, a conviction of the first accused on at least one count, probably on a reduced loss figure, remains possible, though it would be vulnerable on appeal given the gaps in the investigation.
Kwame Adusei 1 day ago

Very soon Wontumi will get a partner in Nsawam. More NPP Thieves will join

Very soon Wontumi will get a partner in Nsawam. More NPP Thieves will join
Pelicles 1 day ago

To all NDC bootlickers, get this into your thick skull that "Prison was made for humans" so, if Adu Boahene goes to jail, what is wrong with that?

The AG is doing all they can to jail somebody to prove their foolishness, b ...
read full comment

To all NDC bootlickers, get this into your thick skull that "Prison was made for humans" so, if Adu Boahene goes to jail, what is wrong with that?

The AG is doing all they can to jail somebody to prove their foolishness, but NDC will not rule forever. Commonsense shows that the AG is struggling to prove their case because the government witness testified positively on behalf of Adu Boahene, and that means what?

During this trial, the court forced the AG to submit to the courts some missing bank statement they intentionally held from the courts, and that means what to those NDC foolish people? Mmoa.
Kotopr3 1 day ago

At first I thought it was a fine case per AG's press conferences on this case. Now, based on PWs accounts, this case has become a foolish case. 'The there is not there but trying there to be there'. Where are the Ghana-must-g ...
read full comment

At first I thought it was a fine case per AG's press conferences on this case. Now, based on PWs accounts, this case has become a foolish case. 'The there is not there but trying there to be there'. Where are the Ghana-must-go bag(s) that AG said they were used to carry the stolen money? The videos put out there that monies and other valuables carried away from the couple's residence, where are they? Apuu
LONGJOHN 16 hours ago

I WANT KNOW FROM ATTA AKYEA IF THE LEGAL VACATION IS OVER? UPON ALL THE NOISE HE'S NOT GOING TO COURT. UNTIL THE LEGAL VACATION IS OVER WHY DID HE GO? BRAGGART

I WANT KNOW FROM ATTA AKYEA IF THE LEGAL VACATION IS OVER? UPON ALL THE NOISE HE'S NOT GOING TO COURT. UNTIL THE LEGAL VACATION IS OVER WHY DID HE GO? BRAGGART

26 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

The Republic v. Kwabena Adu-Boahene and Others: Full proceedings

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (26)

Read Comments Comments (26)