NDC's Joinder Application: How the Supreme Court judges ruled!

Read Article

Comments (94)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (94)

JAMES Y 12 years ago

The first victory for the NDC has been achieved. A second one will follow suit when the main petition filed by the NPP challenging the 2012 election results is heard. After that, who knows?

The first victory for the NDC has been achieved. A second one will follow suit when the main petition filed by the NPP challenging the 2012 election results is heard. After that, who knows?
TerriblY Spe cifiC 12 years ago

For a party whose eight-year rule showcased politics as the most lucrative venture in Ghana, one can only understand why they very much relish the “return” of those days. There were days in Ghana when wealth was abound at ...
read full comment

For a party whose eight-year rule showcased politics as the most lucrative venture in Ghana, one can only understand why they very much relish the “return” of those days. There were days in Ghana when wealth was abound at the seat of government and at every level of political officialdom; I don’t infer that it is different today but it certainly started with the NPP.

We witnessed ministers, MMDCEs and other appointees under the Rawlings regime suddenly become paupers whiles their counterparts under the NPP became fabulous overnight and to those interested in the evidence I refer them to JAK and Haruna Esseku: the only reason I failed to use corruption is simply that I have no hard evidence but for me the most corrupt is not the convict, but the one who outmaneuvers the law. With this in mind one begins to wonder if any political party was more vigilant at the various polling stations and collation centers than the party which charged its supporters not to leave the polling stations after voting, the New Patriotic Party.

The 2012 elections was supposed to be the most credible elections ever conducted within this fourth republic of our democracy but in a matter of fairness let’s not be that quick till we hear the verdict of the Supreme Court. The NPP has raised some red flags regarding how the EC figures were collated and seem very convinced that those anomalies when considered at the Supreme Court will annul the EC declaration of John Dramani Mahama as president elect.

We have almost forgotten that in 2008 figures in the Ashanti Region swelled so much that some constituencies recorded very outrageous voter turnouts in excess of 94 per cent [Nhyiaesu, Bantama, Kwadaso, Suame, Manhyia] and yet those who are crying foul today assume an aloof posture when mention is made of irregularities in the 2004/2008 elections when they were incumbents; it is indeed funny when the elephant sees an umbrella and cries wolf!

When we finally thought the NPP [and I use NPP here more reservedly since I do not believe that such actions reflect the true collective stance of the average NPP member], got the evidence to back their famous “fraud and rigging” case, we were let down as what they claimed was gargantuan evidence only turned out to be irregularities arising. Though one cannot fault them on taking irregularities to court, one wonders why the NPP were crying wolf when there wasn’t any, knowing that same irregularities were more rampant during the two elections under their eight-year rule.

If the NPP had a genuine case, their conduct would not have been this awkward. We all remember when Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie [Sir John], the general Secretary of the NPP “declared” the results claiming the NPP had won by 53% and one will like to know if their so called evidence is consistent with that desperate conduct of sore losers.

What is even laughable is the devilish and indecent quest of the NPP to disenfranchise 1,340,018 Ghanaians in order that a selfish candidate, whose party only managed to win in two out of ten regions with a wretched minority in parliament (including none in two regions), take over the realms of our affairs as Ghanaians. For all intends and purposes, what the NPP is seeking is not justice, it is injustice. The thought that the supreme court will set aside the will of over a million voters to satisfy the will of Nana Akuffo Addo, will be one interesting manifestation in our Judicial history. It is becoming clear that the NPP leadership are wet dreamers who tickle themselves and their unsuspecting supporters with this Supreme Court case for political excitement.

It is much evident that the real reasons for this court case is not to overturn a declared result but to ensure political relevance for Nana and most importantly that a certain mafia avoids politically extinction. It appears, and is indeed so, that some politicians within the NPP will become very redundant should the leadership of the party go to someone other than Akuffo Addo and for this group Nana Addo’s defeat is more of a heartache to them than Nana himself.

What may not sound clear to the average Ghanaian is the sharp divisions and mutual suspicions within the NPP but those divisions are very real and it appears the “Kyebi Mafia” have exhausted their chance. Their leader has not only been given two wasted chances already but has also advanced in age and it is becoming more than obvious that he will not be the choice of many within the NPP come 2016. Assuming the court case travels into 2014 by which time the NPP will be preparing to elect a flag bearer, this mafia will then have a desperately needed “solid case” for their darling candidate.

The NPP may assign millions of external reasons for their defeat but the fact remains that their problem is within. The NPP must admit that they had a candidate whose voter appeal did not cross the minds of the undecided. Akuffo Addo seems to be a great man only in the ranks of the NPP but his external outlook is so deficient to equal the likes of Prof. Atta Mills and H.E John Dramani Mahama and what he needed to seal it all was his rather embarrassing “ALL DIE BE DIE” comments which he has, not surprisingly, defended with his life.

His “perceived” arrogance is solidly embedded in his “romantic voice” and those who think he will make it in a third chance should know that we are dealing with a man whose “simulated voice” and domineering conduct does not attract sympathy. What is more is the seeming acuity that the NPP is an Ashanti/Akyem (not Akan) party which the party has worked so hard to prove right. The mere fact that they choose a northerner as running mate does not erode this impression as the NPP largely view other minority groups as secondary Ghanaians.

I have personally tasted defeat and the little said about it the better. It takes humility and greater maturity to see the opportunity defeat offers; a time to reflect and re-strategize. For a party that was determined to win at all cost, defeat could have devastating consequences but giving your supporters some false optimism that they will wake up soon to witness the swearing in of their candidate as President is empty fascination that could turn out as suicide for the elephant. Defeat is painful, the NPP has lost yet another election and its followers must get used to it or a series of loses await them. Long live Ghana.

Hon. Noah Ben Azure
MP, Binduri Constituency
bennoah60@yahoo.com
www.facebook.com/asumazuur
BAM 12 years ago

THE JUDITIARY IS CORRUPT. ALL THE NPP NEED TO DO IS TO SEEM THEM BEHIND CLOSED DOOR AND GIVE THEM SOME OF THE COCAINE MONEY.

THE JUDITIARY IS CORRUPT. ALL THE NPP NEED TO DO IS TO SEEM THEM BEHIND CLOSED DOOR AND GIVE THEM SOME OF THE COCAINE MONEY.
The NDC Weak Minds Are Back 12 years ago

Just mark it on the wall. NPP will win this case by 6 - 3 for a rerun of the elections. We will see how NDC takes this.

Just mark it on the wall. NPP will win this case by 6 - 3 for a rerun of the elections. We will see how NDC takes this.
GENERAL DeGAULE 12 years ago

The petitioner is not asking for a re run of the elections. he is asking the SC to universally declare him President based on the audit of a selected sample of polling stations results.

The petitioner is not asking for a re run of the elections. he is asking the SC to universally declare him President based on the audit of a selected sample of polling stations results.
The NDC Weak Minds Are Back 12 years ago

Mrs Justice Bamfo said if the Supreme Court should come to a decision that the presidential elections should be re-run the applicant would still play a critical role in the selection and sponsoring of its candidate.

Mrs Justice Bamfo said if the Supreme Court should come to a decision that the presidential elections should be re-run the applicant would still play a critical role in the selection and sponsoring of its candidate.
Atinga Kobla Atongo 12 years ago

WE SHALL SEE HOW THIS WILL END. GOD IS ALWAYS BEHIND JUSTICE. NDC WILL NOW HAVE NO EXCUSES WHEN EC AND MAHAMA LOOSE AT THE END.
IT'S SO SAD. GHANAINS ARE SO FICKLE MINDED, THEY HAVE FORGOTTEN HOW THIS GUYS HAVE RAIDED OUR NA ...
read full comment

WE SHALL SEE HOW THIS WILL END. GOD IS ALWAYS BEHIND JUSTICE. NDC WILL NOW HAVE NO EXCUSES WHEN EC AND MAHAMA LOOSE AT THE END.
IT'S SO SAD. GHANAINS ARE SO FICKLE MINDED, THEY HAVE FORGOTTEN HOW THIS GUYS HAVE RAIDED OUR NATIONAL WEALTH, WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE, EVEN JJ IS DISGUSTED.
HE BROUGHT A LION CURB HOME AND IT HAS OUT GROWN HIM NOW.HE CAN'T CONTROL IT NOW. SO TERRIBLE! GOD GIVE THE JUSTICES COURAGE TO BE TRUTHFUL, FIRM AND FAIR.
AKU 12 years ago

THANK GOD YOU ARE ALSO A GHANAIAN. WE NEED TO MIND OUR SPEECH NOT TO USE POLITICAL PLATFORMS TO INSULTS OURSELVES.

THANK GOD YOU ARE ALSO A GHANAIAN. WE NEED TO MIND OUR SPEECH NOT TO USE POLITICAL PLATFORMS TO INSULTS OURSELVES.
kofi essoun 12 years ago

The Asantes and Akyems on one side of the bench ruled in favour of NPP just like the real voting last year.God save mother Ghana.

The Asantes and Akyems on one side of the bench ruled in favour of NPP just like the real voting last year.God save mother Ghana.
Prince Amoah 12 years ago

NPP should think about 2016 and stop ''cantata joke''at supreme court

NPP should think about 2016 and stop ''cantata joke''at supreme court

SGT ANANI FIADZOE 12 years ago

Mahama has no chance to be called am
election winner, he would be thrown out from the Castle and give way to
Nana Akuffo Addo.

Nana Akuffo Addo is our credible President not a corrupt and thievery
Mahama and his NDC cro ...
read full comment

Mahama has no chance to be called am
election winner, he would be thrown out from the Castle and give way to
Nana Akuffo Addo.

Nana Akuffo Addo is our credible President not a corrupt and thievery
Mahama and his NDC crooks.
HOME BOY 12 years ago

Please sir, we re reading your comment so use the right words.The WORD AM is different from AN. Thank you. But know that God have His ways.

Please sir, we re reading your comment so use the right words.The WORD AM is different from AN. Thank you. But know that God have His ways.
Novembre 12 years ago

The arguments put forward by the loosing judges describes it all. They were fighting an Ashanti tribal battle. LITTLE MINDS SHAAAAAAAMMMMMMEEEEEE!!!!!1

The arguments put forward by the loosing judges describes it all. They were fighting an Ashanti tribal battle. LITTLE MINDS SHAAAAAAAMMMMMMEEEEEE!!!!!1
KOFI DEI 12 years ago

What has it got to do with Ashantis?
Ah! wat do u want Ashanti's to do. Look wat u say wudn't change who we are.

What has it got to do with Ashantis?
Ah! wat do u want Ashanti's to do. Look wat u say wudn't change who we are.
KONKONSA 12 years ago

IS IT TRUE THAT THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY (NDP)OUR NATION OUR FUTURE WAS BEEN FINANCED BY SOME MEMBERS OF THE NPP?

IS IT TRUE THAT THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY (NDP)OUR NATION OUR FUTURE WAS BEEN FINANCED BY SOME MEMBERS OF THE NPP?
ko 12 years ago

Do not cry foul the next time when judgement favors NPP

Do not cry foul the next time when judgement favors NPP
YawMan 12 years ago

Mrs Justice Bamfo said if the Supreme Court should come to a decision that the presidential elections should be re-run the applicant would still play a critical role in the selection and sponsoring of its candidate.

_------ ...
read full comment

Mrs Justice Bamfo said if the Supreme Court should come to a decision that the presidential elections should be re-run the applicant would still play a critical role in the selection and sponsoring of its candidate.

_------''-------------

By this reasoning, can all the other parties and independent candidates apply to be joined? Afterall, they will also have to spend money on campaigning should a rerun be ordered.
Taamiawu 12 years ago

The elections? through 'vodoo' math,Nana Addo wants to be declared the President,is`nt it? And btw, which PARTY`S program would he be implementing, in the unlikely event his petition is upheld?

The elections? through 'vodoo' math,Nana Addo wants to be declared the President,is`nt it? And btw, which PARTY`S program would he be implementing, in the unlikely event his petition is upheld?
AWUKU,ACCRA 12 years ago

Kudos, guys,national interest is SUPREME,it overides party interest.The judges must be commended for a good job done,and they must remember that nation first.

Kudos, guys,national interest is SUPREME,it overides party interest.The judges must be commended for a good job done,and they must remember that nation first.
VIGILANTE 12 years ago

Ghana for you. These JUDGES used their comon sense/ emotions to pass judgement instead of what the LAW SAYS. But remember, when the laws are being manipulated, the thoughtful citizen forsee uncertainties in the future. A WORD ...
read full comment

Ghana for you. These JUDGES used their comon sense/ emotions to pass judgement instead of what the LAW SAYS. But remember, when the laws are being manipulated, the thoughtful citizen forsee uncertainties in the future. A WORD TO A WISE IS ALWAYS......

Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 12 years ago

This ruling will be discussed by legal experts and students of Law for some time to come. It is very interesting that, even the dissenting Justices agreed that NDC has interest in the petition but that interest could be pursu ...
read full comment

This ruling will be discussed by legal experts and students of Law for some time to come. It is very interesting that, even the dissenting Justices agreed that NDC has interest in the petition but that interest could be pursued through the first respondent and not necessarily in their own right as third respondent.

I share the view of the majority, especially, the wider interpretation of the constitution as suggested by SCJ Atuguba. That is what I expected and I believe justice has been served.

YawMan, if the final decision of the Justices is that there should be a run off, that would be between the two leading candidates only. However, if the decision is a rerun, then all the candidates will have the opportunity to participate. I doubt if a rerun will be the outcome.
brains 12 years ago

woo good one they

woo good one they
Kwasi Miezah, Western Region 12 years ago

NDC is not intervening they are joining. There's a difference between joining and intervention.

NDC is not intervening they are joining. There's a difference between joining and intervention.
Jogate 12 years ago

The supreme Judges don't even know the difference
Hey Kwasi, You are in form!

The supreme Judges don't even know the difference
Hey Kwasi, You are in form!
Atsiglini 12 years ago

In fact Kwasi Miezah, I am also impress with your reasoning.In fact some of you could make better SC judges. As for the judge who said that he did so to hide his sympathy for the petitioners.

In fact Kwasi Miezah, I am also impress with your reasoning.In fact some of you could make better SC judges. As for the judge who said that he did so to hide his sympathy for the petitioners.
KOFI BOADU 12 years ago

I don't think any of u guys are smart. Can anybody file to join the case because they think their votes had been switched to another candidate?? NDC did not win or lose any election so why allow them to join. It was Mahama wh ...
read full comment

I don't think any of u guys are smart. Can anybody file to join the case because they think their votes had been switched to another candidate?? NDC did not win or lose any election so why allow them to join. It was Mahama who supposedly claims to have won not NDC. NDC interest in this matter is no greater or smaller than any Ghanaian
EDENSU 12 years ago

Article 64 (1)of the Constitution of the Republic of Ghana stipulates as follows: "The validity of the election of the President may be challenged only by a citizen of Ghana who may present a petition for the purpose to the S ...
read full comment

Article 64 (1)of the Constitution of the Republic of Ghana stipulates as follows: "The validity of the election of the President may be challenged only by a citizen of Ghana who may present a petition for the purpose to the Supreme Court within twenty-one days after the declaration of the result of the election un respect of which the petition is presented" Article 55 and 66 mentions sponsorship of candidates by political parties, but when it comes to challenging a presidential results, Article 64(1) becomes applicable. I am not an NDC or NPP, but the ruling is interesting. The assertion by Justice Jones Dotse that before the motion was heard it has generated strong emotions in the country cannot pass without a comment. The Justices are to adjudicate and interpret the Constitution but not by the influence and actions of the populace. May the Good Lord Grant Mother Ghana PEACE. God Bless NDC, NPP, PPP and all the other political parties and Ghanaians in general.
DAVID ATUGIYA 12 years ago

NDC by the fact that they selected and sponsored President Mahama won the elections. Mahama is NDC and NDC is Mahama.
Simply read the ruling by Justice
Atuguba below which provides a compelling case for granting NDC's joind ...
read full comment

NDC by the fact that they selected and sponsored President Mahama won the elections. Mahama is NDC and NDC is Mahama.
Simply read the ruling by Justice
Atuguba below which provides a compelling case for granting NDC's joinder
1. "Article 55 and 66 allows political parties to sponsor candidates to stand for presidential and parliamentary elections to capture political power".

2. "the restrictive approach sometimes adopted by the court to interpret a motion for application to a joinder should be avoided".

3. "the applicant has a real interest in the matter and should be joined to the petition and also to assist the court to arrive at conclusive decision".
MAMA 12 years ago

DO NOT BE SURPRISE. ANIN YEBOAH ATTEMPTED SEVERAL TIMES TO JOIN THE BENCH UNDER PNDC BUT FAILLED.KUFFOUR EMPLOYED HIM AND BAFFOE BONNIE HIS RELATIONS.

DO NOT BE SURPRISE. ANIN YEBOAH ATTEMPTED SEVERAL TIMES TO JOIN THE BENCH UNDER PNDC BUT FAILLED.KUFFOUR EMPLOYED HIM AND BAFFOE BONNIE HIS RELATIONS.
kpakpa 12 years ago

Nothing has happened yet and you are explaining off the reasons for why some judges ruled the way they did, what about the others, does the converse hold? stop this.

Nothing has happened yet and you are explaining off the reasons for why some judges ruled the way they did, what about the others, does the converse hold? stop this.

KOFI DEI 12 years ago

lOOK LET ME TELL YOU, THE BAFFOE-BONNIE FAMILY IS A RESPECTED FAMILY. WE RESPECT OUR CULTURE AND OUR ELDERS THUS WHY WE DON'T DRAG DAGGERS TO KILL OURSELVES LIKE SLAUGTERING ANIMALS BUT SETTLE ISSUES BU WORD OF MOUTH.

lOOK LET ME TELL YOU, THE BAFFOE-BONNIE FAMILY IS A RESPECTED FAMILY. WE RESPECT OUR CULTURE AND OUR ELDERS THUS WHY WE DON'T DRAG DAGGERS TO KILL OURSELVES LIKE SLAUGTERING ANIMALS BUT SETTLE ISSUES BU WORD OF MOUTH.
Kojo Appiah, NY 12 years ago

The NPP surrogates have started showing their teeth; we are watching!

The NPP surrogates have started showing their teeth; we are watching!
Akoffo Addo 12 years ago

if you know and understand the constitution,read article 55 and 66 and get to understand it well well.now first tell me the arguments put forward for the joinder was not satisfactory?the party has a direct effect of the outco ...
read full comment

if you know and understand the constitution,read article 55 and 66 and get to understand it well well.now first tell me the arguments put forward for the joinder was not satisfactory?the party has a direct effect of the outcome,also Mahama does not cover NDC but NDC covers Mahama.in other words,Mahama is a subset of NDC,remember the logics u did at the elementary schools?so therefore its a case for the NDC to join.finally the npp has made their mind not to understand any common sense.tell me if the members of the Sc are not wise enough to go about their duties?its sad how people don't know how the law works or how loose their arguments are for the npp in the face of the constitution.what again or what else or what further satisfactory words did they expect to convince them of the joinder?
Setho 12 years ago

Mr Justice Baffoe Bonney said although the applicants were able to demonstrate they have vested interest in the case, they failed to convince the court how they became a necessary party.

He said the law clearly indicates p ...
read full comment

Mr Justice Baffoe Bonney said although the applicants were able to demonstrate they have vested interest in the case, they failed to convince the court how they became a necessary party.

He said the law clearly indicates process by which one can challenge a petition and this must be done by human persons and not an entity.

He said apart from the Member of Parliament who cannot cross carpet and join another party the president can resigned from his political party and still rule with executive powers.

Mr Justice Anin Yeboah who associated himself with Justice Baffoe Bonney said the NDC was coming into the case as an intervener and failed to convince the court why it should joined to the petition.

He said the court can still go ahead and determined the case since the interest of the NDC is not more than that of the first respondent in the matter.

He said the rules of court do not allow the applicant to intervene in a matter which they are not a party to or are not part of a suit.

He said the application by the NDC was unnecessary since all the interest being pursued by the applicant could be taken care of by the first respondent in the petition.

Mr Justice Julius Ansah who also sided with his colleagues said the action can be contested without the involvement of the applicant.
Atsiglini 12 years ago

Yes the interest of the NDC as a political party(group) will always be more than John Mahama a single person. Shallow minded judge.

Yes the interest of the NDC as a political party(group) will always be more than John Mahama a single person. Shallow minded judge.
Boat 12 years ago

I am surprised how these three made it to the SC. Baffoe is smart to make a better argument, he could still not hide his bias, the other two could not make sense with their arguments, show of no neutrality, total bias even th ...
read full comment

I am surprised how these three made it to the SC. Baffoe is smart to make a better argument, he could still not hide his bias, the other two could not make sense with their arguments, show of no neutrality, total bias even their argument shows. They could have demonstrated some smartness as Baffoe.
KOFI DEI 12 years ago

HE IS WISER THAN 100 NORTHNERS BECUASE HE SETTLES ISSUES WITH WISDOM AND BY WORD OF MOUTH NOT CUTLASS AND GUNS. ANIMALS!!!!

HE IS WISER THAN 100 NORTHNERS BECUASE HE SETTLES ISSUES WITH WISDOM AND BY WORD OF MOUTH NOT CUTLASS AND GUNS. ANIMALS!!!!
retired soldeir 12 years ago

all npp lawers bought their certificate,includind akuffo addo.

all npp lawers bought their certificate,includind akuffo addo.
Kojo Yeye 12 years ago

Find out how many times NDC has lost cases in the courts. Why have they not been able to imprison one NPP minister even they accuse them of corruption? They lost all such cases. Shut up if you do nit know the truth.

Find out how many times NDC has lost cases in the courts. Why have they not been able to imprison one NPP minister even they accuse them of corruption? They lost all such cases. Shut up if you do nit know the truth.
dd 12 years ago

the reason the NDC were not able to imprison NPP is that, they are thievs and always distroy evidence and buy judges at all time. they are criminals i man special criminals, but they are know been exposed and very soon they w ...
read full comment

the reason the NDC were not able to imprison NPP is that, they are thievs and always distroy evidence and buy judges at all time. they are criminals i man special criminals, but they are know been exposed and very soon they will be interdicted.
Joe 12 years ago

This is round one win for NDC but they (NDC) should not tickle themselves because the lawyers of both Mahama and NDC are similar pursing the same goal, nothing different, and cannot change the final outcome of the case which ...
read full comment

This is round one win for NDC but they (NDC) should not tickle themselves because the lawyers of both Mahama and NDC are similar pursing the same goal, nothing different, and cannot change the final outcome of the case which will be based on hard copy evidence available. I doubt it whether NDC can win this case.It is going to be very very interesting.
kululu 12 years ago

Baffoe B and Anin Y's conclusions makes more sense to me.however, all we need is peaceful and acceptable judgement to all parties. Only few are going to enjoy politically and they are the ones to shout on top of other voices, ...
read full comment

Baffoe B and Anin Y's conclusions makes more sense to me.however, all we need is peaceful and acceptable judgement to all parties. Only few are going to enjoy politically and they are the ones to shout on top of other voices, the whole population suffers, especially the poor folks if matters are not resolved amicably.
AGYEMAN 12 years ago

BAFFOE BONNIE IS A USELESS JUDGE. IF THE NDC LAWYERS FAILED TO CONVINCE THE COURT, HOW DID THEY WIN BY 6-3?.IF THE NDC IS IRRELEVANT IN THIS CASE, THEN JAKE OBITSEBI SHOULDN'T HAVE JOINED NANA ADDO & HIS MATE.THOUGH NANA IS I ...
read full comment

BAFFOE BONNIE IS A USELESS JUDGE. IF THE NDC LAWYERS FAILED TO CONVINCE THE COURT, HOW DID THEY WIN BY 6-3?.IF THE NDC IS IRRELEVANT IN THIS CASE, THEN JAKE OBITSEBI SHOULDN'T HAVE JOINED NANA ADDO & HIS MATE.THOUGH NANA IS IN COURT AS A CITIZEN, HE REPRESENTED A POLITICAL PARTY. THE 3 JUSTICES WHO RULED THE OTHER WAY DID IT PURELY ON PARTY LINE. THEIR ARGUMENT WAS WEAK & CHILDISH. I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY GOT TO THAT LEVEL.
Jogate 12 years ago

By their rulings (fruits), we shall know them all and tag them well

By their rulings (fruits), we shall know them all and tag them well
Taamiawu 12 years ago

Justices are going to decide the case on the basis of evidence, then forget it. thanks to Fmr Pres Kuffour,they have the upper hand, and that is what has emboldened Nana Addo and company to act with so much 'confidence'; but ...
read full comment

Justices are going to decide the case on the basis of evidence, then forget it. thanks to Fmr Pres Kuffour,they have the upper hand, and that is what has emboldened Nana Addo and company to act with so much 'confidence'; but we are all anxiously waiting to see the "solid" and "incontrovertible" evidence we have heard so much about!
Owusu Afriyie can change his tune now and claim he`s pleased with the ruling. The fact of the matter is that we all saw his demeanor when the hearing started. They have one more chance at bat,and they`ll be out!
effo yaw 12 years ago

the six justices who ruled in favour of their party are all known ndc people and GOD is watching them.

the six justices who ruled in favour of their party are all known ndc people and GOD is watching them.
Boy 12 years ago

Hmmm asem beba dabi?

Hmmm asem beba dabi?
Akoffo Addo 12 years ago

the arguments put forward by Mr Baffoe Bonney lacks merit,this is because,if the NDC can channel whatsoever they wanted through the respondent,then a question is raised,why can't the NDC be there in person.the party is DIRECT ...
read full comment

the arguments put forward by Mr Baffoe Bonney lacks merit,this is because,if the NDC can channel whatsoever they wanted through the respondent,then a question is raised,why can't the NDC be there in person.the party is DIRECTY affected by the decisions of the SC,in legal terms,i will say Mahama and the NDC are in fiduciary relationship and so are inseperatably.i keep saying that laws are made,however it depends on how you argue your case.evidence beyond reasonable doubts are binding in the law courts of judiciary.suppose the npp has a voice recorder or a video of the first and second respondent planning of a rig,then the npp should have brought this before the election,even so,it will not be solid as the actual crime had not taken place,not that in other similar cases where a plot has been taking and yet not carried on,can amount to arrest,certainly not in this case as this will have been a crime for interfering without consent someones conversation which by law is illegal.case ref murdock case in the UK.polling agents everywhere etc.so what kind of evidence are expecting either the rubbish ones the npp has provided?
Nana Bawuah 12 years ago

" voice recorder or a video"

audio or video recordings are not allowed to be used in court. Since it is illegal to record someone without their knowledge.

" voice recorder or a video"

audio or video recordings are not allowed to be used in court. Since it is illegal to record someone without their knowledge.
Nana Bawuah 12 years ago

By the way, you are a funny guy, assuming videos and audio recordings are the only credible source of evidence hahahaha

By the way, you are a funny guy, assuming videos and audio recordings are the only credible source of evidence hahahaha
GENERAL DeGAULE 12 years ago

She did not explain how this channelling of the NDC's interest could take place. Your interest is vested in you as a person or legal entity and is not meant for channelling.

She did not explain how this channelling of the NDC's interest could take place. Your interest is vested in you as a person or legal entity and is not meant for channelling.
GENERAL DeGAULE 12 years ago

She did not explain how this channelling of the NDC's interest could take place. Your interest is vested in you as a person or legal entity and is not meant for channelling.

She did not explain how this channelling of the NDC's interest could take place. Your interest is vested in you as a person or legal entity and is not meant for channelling.
kankama 12 years ago

I hope this case will be treated with care no bias. The whole world is watching.Please we don't want any disgrace.We have respect outside let keep it.Thanks

I hope this case will be treated with care no bias. The whole world is watching.Please we don't want any disgrace.We have respect outside let keep it.Thanks
Yao Tee 12 years ago

Posterity will surely judge all in this particular case. Our dear nation is at the cross roads. God Almighty help us.The TRUTH will surely win this unneccesary debate.

Posterity will surely judge all in this particular case. Our dear nation is at the cross roads. God Almighty help us.The TRUTH will surely win this unneccesary debate.
Jogate 12 years ago

"Mr Justice Baffoe Bonney said although the applicants were able to demonstrate they have vested interest in the case, they failed to convince the court how they became a necessary party"

"Mr Justice Baffoe Bonney said although the applicants were able to demonstrate they have vested interest in the case, they failed to convince the court how they became a necessary party"
Jogate 12 years ago

If the NDC were able to demonstrate that they had a vested interest and they had filed a joiner on which you as a judge was sitting on, why ask how they became a party to the case?

If the NDC were able to demonstrate that they had a vested interest and they had filed a joiner on which you as a judge was sitting on, why ask how they became a party to the case?
BIssy 12 years ago

You were all put in a very difficult position. However, you all managed to come out with flying colours. You all won the day since denying the joiner application would have prolong the main court case. God bless you all for a ...
read full comment

You were all put in a very difficult position. However, you all managed to come out with flying colours. You all won the day since denying the joiner application would have prolong the main court case. God bless you all for a job well done.
Oh Ghana 12 years ago

Freedom and Justice
This is Third World Justice in display
Winner Takes All justice
I appoint you judge and you rule in my favour or you're fired

Freedom and Justice
This is Third World Justice in display
Winner Takes All justice
I appoint you judge and you rule in my favour or you're fired
Asantenee Kwaku Bratuo 12 years ago

The majority of justices' to this ruling have delivered a concessionary judgment. The letter of the law has not been demonstrated as the opposing judges have pointed out. The weight and clout of the ruling government and thei ...
read full comment

The majority of justices' to this ruling have delivered a concessionary judgment. The letter of the law has not been demonstrated as the opposing judges have pointed out. The weight and clout of the ruling government and their supporter intransigence and clear demonstration of intent to resort to social unrest has clearly influenced the circumspection with the ruling was reached. I pray that future considerations will contain itself within the tight confines of the law and not be swayed by timidity and popular sentiments as be clearly demonstrated in this ruling.

Bratuo
GENERAL DeGAULE 12 years ago

The letter of the law is considered side by side with the spirit of the law.
The poignant view to note is the Justices ruling that;
"political parties including the NDC were integral part of the current democratic dispensat ...
read full comment

The letter of the law is considered side by side with the spirit of the law.
The poignant view to note is the Justices ruling that;
"political parties including the NDC were integral part of the current democratic dispensation and which selected and sponsored the first respondent to stand on its ticket."
Paul Amuna 12 years ago

The justices on both sides are humans after all. Those who argued against the joiner said the first respondent can "deal with the case on behalf of the party". So, couldn't Nana and Bawumia also do the same with Jake? In my o ...
read full comment

The justices on both sides are humans after all. Those who argued against the joiner said the first respondent can "deal with the case on behalf of the party". So, couldn't Nana and Bawumia also do the same with Jake? In my opinion it is jake's joiner which has created this unnecessary precedent which has the potential to harm our democracy.nover the medium to long term. In my view, neither Obetsebi nor the NDC should have been involved in the case, then we won't have this "human" interpretation of the obvious.
Boat 12 years ago

My friend, you should have bold enough to say, Jake should not have joined and also say that Bawumia should also have not enjoined himself to the case.

See, Baffoe's argument falls flat by the very involvement of Jake and ...
read full comment

My friend, you should have bold enough to say, Jake should not have joined and also say that Bawumia should also have not enjoined himself to the case.

See, Baffoe's argument falls flat by the very involvement of Jake and Bawumia. Could Nana Addo not have represented their interest as Baffoe is arguing that the first respondent should be able to represent the interest of the NDC?
Boat 12 years ago

"you should have been bold"

"you should have been bold"
DAVID ATUGIYA 12 years ago

Paul, the arguements by the Justices against the joiner while I very much respect thier views I fundamentally disagree with them because those views or opinions are neither sound nor reasonable.

Justice Atuguba's ruling i ...
read full comment

Paul, the arguements by the Justices against the joiner while I very much respect thier views I fundamentally disagree with them because those views or opinions are neither sound nor reasonable.

Justice Atuguba's ruling in particular makes a compelling case for granting the NDC joinder. Jusctice Atuguba and the other 5 Justices in effect are saying Mahama is NDC and NDC is Mahama and that has been the central arguement of the NDC's legal team in the joinder application.

So irresptive of whether Jake is joiner or not in the petition filed by NPP, the SC would have still come to the decision reached yesterday. That indeed NDC is an interested party and justice and fairness could not have been seen to be done if they were not granted the permission to join the petition as an interested party
Simon Loghod 12 years ago

I strogly am of the view that sometimes, you don't need to be a lawyer before drawing a conclusion on certain matters. This is one of such and I think NDC as a party have every right to join in the petition by the NPP.

I strogly am of the view that sometimes, you don't need to be a lawyer before drawing a conclusion on certain matters. This is one of such and I think NDC as a party have every right to join in the petition by the NPP.
Simon Loghod 12 years ago

I strogly am of the view that sometimes, you don't need to be a lawyer before drawing a conclusion on certain matters. This is one of such and I think NDC as a party have every right to join in the petition by the NPP.

I strogly am of the view that sometimes, you don't need to be a lawyer before drawing a conclusion on certain matters. This is one of such and I think NDC as a party have every right to join in the petition by the NPP.
Ishak 12 years ago

Second defeat to NPP,soon they will start crying in court ewith baseless argument.......Nana Addo shame!

Second defeat to NPP,soon they will start crying in court ewith baseless argument.......Nana Addo shame!
Asantehene 12 years ago

NPP HAS LEARNING LAWYERS BUT NDC HAS TEACHERS OF THE LAWYERS.

NPP HAS LEARNING LAWYERS BUT NDC HAS TEACHERS OF THE LAWYERS.
THE TEXAN 12 years ago

Atuguba has to recuse himself from this case for conflict of interest as he was just sworn in some few months ago by Mahama,it will never happened in the civilised world where justice is paramount.Check this US had elections ...
read full comment

Atuguba has to recuse himself from this case for conflict of interest as he was just sworn in some few months ago by Mahama,it will never happened in the civilised world where justice is paramount.Check this US had elections November 7,2012 Obama was sworn in January 21,2013,a lot of room for DEMOCRACY to work.Its does not work likewise in JUNGLE Practising Democracy in Ghana.What's the next step POLITICAL ASSASINATIONS to spread the word out as done in Palestine's SUICIDE BOMBING by ARAFAT.WAKE UP GHANA AGAINST FOOLSDAY.
Boat 12 years ago

My friend, the Justice is not part of Mahama's government. Please check the fact.

My friend, the Justice is not part of Mahama's government. Please check the fact.
JAMES ADDO 12 years ago

R U SAYING WE R NOT CIVILIZED?

R U SAYING WE R NOT CIVILIZED?
princewilly@ymail.com 12 years ago

"Oh, please excuse me!" said the bunny. "I didn't mean to trip over you, but I'm blind and couldn't see you there."

"That's perfectly all right," replied the snake. "It was MY fault. I didn't mean to trip you, but I'm blin ...
read full comment

"Oh, please excuse me!" said the bunny. "I didn't mean to trip over you, but I'm blind and couldn't see you there."

"That's perfectly all right," replied the snake. "It was MY fault. I didn't mean to trip you, but I'm blind too, and I didn't see you coming. By the way, what kind of animal are you?"

"Well, I really don't know," said the bunny. "Since I'm blind, I've never seen myself. Perhaps you could examine me and then we'll both know?"

So the snake felt the bunny all over and said, "Well, you're soft and cuddly; you have long silky ears, a fluffy little tail and a twitchy little nose ... you must be a BUNNY RABBIT!" [The little blind bunny was so pleased at this that he danced with joy.] The bunny said, "I can't thank you enough. What kind of animal are you, sir?"

The snake said he didn't know, for the same reason. The bunny agreed to examine him, and when he finished the snake asked, "So, what kind of animal am I?"

The bunny said, "You're hard, you're cold, you're slimy, and you haven't got any balls. You must be a lawyer'
AWUDU 12 years ago

I saw Prophet Solomon of the Old Testament sitting in judgment in the Supreme Court: wisdom, fairness, justice. What baffles me is the contradictory statement of Justice Baffoe Bonney: that NDC "demonstrated they have a veste ...
read full comment

I saw Prophet Solomon of the Old Testament sitting in judgment in the Supreme Court: wisdom, fairness, justice. What baffles me is the contradictory statement of Justice Baffoe Bonney: that NDC "demonstrated they have a vested interest," but "failed to convince how they became a necessary party." Confused Justice. I also thin Justice Yeboa was just pandering justice. The NDC is an interested party in the case, Mr. Justice. It sponsored the candidate called John Mahama and it needs be to sure that his victory sustained. How difficult is stand to understand. Justice Ansah, I wonder how he can say the case can be contested without the involvement of the applicant. So what is NPP doing in the case? Who is Kantanka? Is he the Presidential candidate of the NPP? What crap.
Nana Bawuah 12 years ago

The case has not even started and the NDC riff-raffs are already crying hahaha

The case has not even started and the NDC riff-raffs are already crying hahaha
Drake (u.s.a) 12 years ago

Do u need powerful spiritual help? I know of a very very powerful young lady name Queen who has rescue me from hell, poverty nd shame. Nd has made me very very rich nd powerful. Wats ur problem? Name it nd Queen will solve al ...
read full comment

Do u need powerful spiritual help? I know of a very very powerful young lady name Queen who has rescue me from hell, poverty nd shame. Nd has made me very very rich nd powerful. Wats ur problem? Name it nd Queen will solve all ur problems. Contact Queen on 0574195158
Dan Botwe 12 years ago

It is possible the judges affiliations to political parties can affect the judgement? I think so and those judges should be careful not to do anything out of selfish interest.

It is possible the judges affiliations to political parties can affect the judgement? I think so and those judges should be careful not to do anything out of selfish interest.
JAMES ADDO 12 years ago

I PERFECTLY AGREED WITH YOU.

I PERFECTLY AGREED WITH YOU.
Concerned Ghanaian 12 years ago

The 3 justices who ruled to oppose the application are most wise judges in Ghana who will never sell their conscience for money but will always uphold and defend the truth and the constituition.

The 3 justices who ruled to oppose the application are most wise judges in Ghana who will never sell their conscience for money but will always uphold and defend the truth and the constituition.
kofi essoun 12 years ago

Justice Baffoe Bonnie mentioned the petition before the court as NPP petition and yet did not agreeed that NDC as a party shuold join.What is the sense?

Justice Baffoe Bonnie mentioned the petition before the court as NPP petition and yet did not agreeed that NDC as a party shuold join.What is the sense?
YAW DONKOR 12 years ago

If the facts are true that there was cheating in the elections (Dec. 7. 2012, then all parties have the right to contest. Just close the case. mahama's business as usulal with no contradictions.

If the facts are true that there was cheating in the elections (Dec. 7. 2012, then all parties have the right to contest. Just close the case. mahama's business as usulal with no contradictions.
YAW DONKOR 12 years ago

close the case. Every party would have a chance to contest if NPP wins the CASE

close the case. Every party would have a chance to contest if NPP wins the CASE
Kaymensah 12 years ago

Sound arguments from both sides, but the majority's view held sway. Round 2 beckons.

Sound arguments from both sides, but the majority's view held sway. Round 2 beckons.
The same 12 years ago

nana adowa can not be a president in Ghana how can two bush animals come home? adowa and elephant. NO!!!!

nana adowa can not be a president in Ghana how can two bush animals come home? adowa and elephant. NO!!!!
JAMES ADDO 12 years ago

I SEE THE COURT CASE AS A SUIT AGAINST THE MINORITIES OF THIS LAND FROM THE MAJORITY TRIBES. GHANA IS FOR ALL OF US. PLEASE NOTE THAT.
I HOPE THE EVENTUAL OUTCOME WILL PUT TO REST ALL MATTERS ARISING OR PERTAINING TO THE UNI ...
read full comment

I SEE THE COURT CASE AS A SUIT AGAINST THE MINORITIES OF THIS LAND FROM THE MAJORITY TRIBES. GHANA IS FOR ALL OF US. PLEASE NOTE THAT.
I HOPE THE EVENTUAL OUTCOME WILL PUT TO REST ALL MATTERS ARISING OR PERTAINING TO THE UNITY AND PEACEFULNESS OF THIS DEAR COUNTRY OF OURS.
GOD BLESS OUR HOME LAND AND LONG LIVE GHANA.
COMMON SENSE 12 years ago

So is a whole Supreme Court Judge equating the capacity of a petitioner to sue with that of the locus standi of a respondent?? The law maker did not intend so otherwise it would have clearly stated that a respondent,intereste ...
read full comment

So is a whole Supreme Court Judge equating the capacity of a petitioner to sue with that of the locus standi of a respondent?? The law maker did not intend so otherwise it would have clearly stated that a respondent,interested party seeking to join must also be a person.If we are to go by BAFFOE CUM NPP arguments, is the EC a person?
Akua P 12 years ago

God help us

God help us
Joseph A. 12 years ago

The court shoul not any mistake and rule in favour of Nana. The country will be in choirs,that is, it will to NDC,NPP war and generate into tribal war.Iwant to appeal to the high court of ghana to be extra careful on this cas ...
read full comment

The court shoul not any mistake and rule in favour of Nana. The country will be in choirs,that is, it will to NDC,NPP war and generate into tribal war.Iwant to appeal to the high court of ghana to be extra careful on this case or Ghana may exprience terrible blood shade.Than u.
Akwa 12 years ago

If votes are found to have been "balaoed" or stolen, then cancelling those votes will not be a mistake.And if there are enough cancellations to overturn the results then NDC would not have won in the first place so there will ...
read full comment

If votes are found to have been "balaoed" or stolen, then cancelling those votes will not be a mistake.And if there are enough cancellations to overturn the results then NDC would not have won in the first place so there will be no chaos. This is not a contest of BALAOS but a measurement of the will of the people.In any case NDC claims they did not steal and they are going to defend that successfully so there may not be any decision to overturn. But I can understand that even small and unnecessary issues can result in chaos in certain parts of the country because their understanding is low.But don't worry they will be educated to learn that lasting peace comes by justice. So let us all pursue the truth and the rest will fall in place in due cause.
Mr ADDY 12 years ago

The nation is never happy at all, look at the joy in the eyes of Ghanaian's out there. faded! Nana Addo, -God will surely make a way. Mahama, pls dnt be like the wicked brother who took his brother's blessings in the bible. S ...
read full comment

The nation is never happy at all, look at the joy in the eyes of Ghanaian's out there. faded! Nana Addo, -God will surely make a way. Mahama, pls dnt be like the wicked brother who took his brother's blessings in the bible. Shaaame!!!
Akwa 12 years ago

NPP wins by 5-4 because lookig at all the arguments by the judges collectively, one can see that NDC may be an intrested party alright but their direct involvement or otherwise would yield the same effect. Therefore the only ...
read full comment

NPP wins by 5-4 because lookig at all the arguments by the judges collectively, one can see that NDC may be an intrested party alright but their direct involvement or otherwise would yield the same effect. Therefore the only reason they are there is to drag things and delay the case unnecessarily.So when Justices Dotse and Adinyira sides with the majority but enphasises the fact that a mechaism must be in place to move the case expediciously, which to me is the crux of this whole joinder application,then NPP wins by 5-4.If the involvement of the NDC will not cause a waste of the court's time, then NPP has won.
BAFFOE BONNEY, YEBOAH & ANSAH DONKEY 12 years ago

I think Baffoe Bonney, Yeboah and Ansah are donkeys.

What will happen to this case if, God forbid, Mahama should die today? Will the case against Mahama be dismissed because Mahama is no longer alive? The individual may d ...
read full comment

I think Baffoe Bonney, Yeboah and Ansah are donkeys.

What will happen to this case if, God forbid, Mahama should die today? Will the case against Mahama be dismissed because Mahama is no longer alive? The individual may die any time but institutions outlive any human being.

Mills is dead but NDC is still in existence. Aliu is dead but the NPP is till in existence. Afari Gyan may die today (God forbid) but the EC will still be in existence.

My respect to the 6 justices who argued for fairness and natural justice.
KWAME 12 years ago

After reading your comment I began wondering if the president should die today will the NPP change their suit and rather go after Amissah Arthur?

After reading your comment I began wondering if the president should die today will the NPP change their suit and rather go after Amissah Arthur?
sally 12 years ago

I WISH YOU JUDGES WOULD CALL FOR FRESH ELECTION SO THAT THERE WILL BE NO HIDING MACHINES AND CHANGING OF FIGURES.I KNOW NDC CANNOT MAKE THEIR OWN POLLING STATIONS AGAIN.

I WISH YOU JUDGES WOULD CALL FOR FRESH ELECTION SO THAT THERE WILL BE NO HIDING MACHINES AND CHANGING OF FIGURES.I KNOW NDC CANNOT MAKE THEIR OWN POLLING STATIONS AGAIN.
Oppong Kyekyeku 12 years ago

The 16th paragraph of the article seem to be a departure from precedence and this discretionary ruling could better be done at a palace!

The 16th paragraph of the article seem to be a departure from precedence and this discretionary ruling could better be done at a palace!

94 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

NDC's Joinder Application: How the Supreme Court judges ruled!

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (94)

Read Comments Comments (94)