Tony Lithur and Tsikata to file separate addresses

Read Article

Comments (32)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (32)

Togbe 11 years ago

They can even file separate encyclopaedias for all we care! We have been witnesses to the truth from live telecast and we don't mind even if they submit the whole world! We pray to God for Justice!!!

They can even file separate encyclopaedias for all we care! We have been witnesses to the truth from live telecast and we don't mind even if they submit the whole world! We pray to God for Justice!!!
OLD SOLDIER 11 years ago

When Kwaku Baako informed us about the atrocities of Kwesi Pratt during PNDC Regime, some of us did not believe until the truth was confirmed during the NRC. Kwesi Pratt is the most dangerous Journalist Ghana had ever have, h ...
read full comment

When Kwaku Baako informed us about the atrocities of Kwesi Pratt during PNDC Regime, some of us did not believe until the truth was confirmed during the NRC. Kwesi Pratt is the most dangerous Journalist Ghana had ever have, he had the gut to recommend his fellow journalists to be executed by PNDC. Pratt even recommended Baako to be killed by the regime, thank God Baako was instead touchered violently and severely but his life was spared. This is what Kwesi Pratt can do. Now Pratt is a secret agent to NDC and US Embassy in Ghana. May God forgive Pratt and spare him the untold evils that will come upon him and his generations. The souls of those journalist killed through Pratt's recommendations to PNDC will never forgive Pratt. Now Pratt has the guts to take Diplomatic Passport and smuggled his weak-headed children to work at the Ministries under Mills NDC, may God forgive Pratt and his dependance and spare them of the evils ahead of them...
The 11 years ago

Nana Ato Dadzie l don't seem to understand your point that; "even if something went wrong during the December 2012 elections, it does not mean that the final verdict should be changed."

This is already an admisson by the N ...
read full comment

Nana Ato Dadzie l don't seem to understand your point that; "even if something went wrong during the December 2012 elections, it does not mean that the final verdict should be changed."

This is already an admisson by the NDC legal team that something went wrong. And what is it that went wrong?

1. Over voting - The petitioners gave material evidence which Afari Djan admitted. What does the electoral law say when there is over voting, the justices just need to apply the law.

2. Voting without verification - The same must apply

3. Duplication/Triplication of pink sheets and others - Same must apply.

Then the question as put by the Supreme Court did the malpractices/errors/problems (depending on where you stand) affect the outcome of the elections? If no case close, if yes what should be done to let justice prevail, re-election or a conclusive outright winner. We shall see what happens.
Money 11 years ago

You think nothing went wrong during the trial?

You think nothing went wrong during the trial?
Ato 11 years ago

EVEN CHILDREN IN THE CRÈCHE KNOW THAT SINCE OUR SOCIETY IS NOT PERFECT SOMETHING CAN GO WRONG IN ELECTIONS. IT HAS HAPPENED IN RUSSIA, THE US AND OTHER PLACES. SO THE JUDGES IN THEIR WISDOM STATED BEFORE THE CASE STARTED THA ...
read full comment

EVEN CHILDREN IN THE CRÈCHE KNOW THAT SINCE OUR SOCIETY IS NOT PERFECT SOMETHING CAN GO WRONG IN ELECTIONS. IT HAS HAPPENED IN RUSSIA, THE US AND OTHER PLACES. SO THE JUDGES IN THEIR WISDOM STATED BEFORE THE CASE STARTED THAT THEY WERE GOING TO BASE THEIR JUDGEMENT ON WHETHER THERE WERE IRREGULARITIES AND WHETHER THOSE IRREGULARITIES WERE OF SUCH MAGNITUDE TO AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF THE RESULTS. SO COUNT THE PINK SHEETS. DISCARD THE DUPLICATES, TRIPLICATES, QUADRUPLICATES AND OTHER PLICATES, SUBTRACT ALL THESE FROM THE GENUINE FIGURES AND SEE WHETHER AKUFFO ADDO'S VOTES OUTNUMBER THOSE OF MAHAMA. THIS IS THE CASE BEFORE THE COURT. EVEN THE PETITIONERS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THERE WERE ERRORS IN SOME OF THE FIGURES THEY ALLEGED, THEY ABANDONED SOME AND WITHDREW OTHERS. SO THE CASE WAS OVER LONG AGO. AND ADDISON TRIED TO MAKE THE BEST OUT OF A DIFFICULT CASE. LET US GO FOR THE VERDICT AND RETURN TO WORK. I PRAY AND HOPE THAT THE INSULTS WILL BE OVER SOON.
KOFI ADDO 11 years ago

Why do you have a tight trousers,You can watch it on the moon but you are not the one who is going to the final say.

Why do you have a tight trousers,You can watch it on the moon but you are not the one who is going to the final say.
KOFI ADDO 11 years ago

Why do you have a tight trousers,You can watch it on the moon but you are not the one who is going to give the final say.

Why do you have a tight trousers,You can watch it on the moon but you are not the one who is going to give the final say.
BAFOUR. 11 years ago

THOSE PEOPLE KNOWS WHAT IS GOING ON ALREADY.AFARI GYAN SEND THIS PEOPLE TO THE COURT FOR HIM TO COME AND EXPLAIN TO THEM HOW THEY LOOSE.AND HE DONE THAT.

THOSE PEOPLE KNOWS WHAT IS GOING ON ALREADY.AFARI GYAN SEND THIS PEOPLE TO THE COURT FOR HIM TO COME AND EXPLAIN TO THEM HOW THEY LOOSE.AND HE DONE THAT.
ewe man 11 years ago

is ato dadzie alright

is ato dadzie alright
Kofi 11 years ago

I would have been surprised if Nana Ato Dadzie had seen any material evidence of value

I would have been surprised if Nana Ato Dadzie had seen any material evidence of value

KANOKWARE.... 11 years ago

who cares! a fool will be a fool either he goes to school or not.

who cares! a fool will be a fool either he goes to school or not.
Agosu 11 years ago

It has been so evident that there were so much malpractices and violations during the elections as testified and confirmed by Afari-Gyan. We humbly wait and pray for Just ruling from our competent Supreme Court Judges!!

It has been so evident that there were so much malpractices and violations during the elections as testified and confirmed by Afari-Gyan. We humbly wait and pray for Just ruling from our competent Supreme Court Judges!!
right 2 cast vote is sacred-Akufo Add 11 years ago

An unmeritorious case brought in BAD FAITH to disenfranchised Ghanaians in exercising their inviolable right of choosing a leader so that one man, Nana Addo, can achieve a life-long ambition of becoming the president is NO ju ...
read full comment

An unmeritorious case brought in BAD FAITH to disenfranchised Ghanaians in exercising their inviolable right of choosing a leader so that one man, Nana Addo, can achieve a life-long ambition of becoming the president is NO justice, but injustice in the superlative order and goes to demonstrate how egoistic and arrogant the man in question is. Wait for TRUE justice which is the sacred constitutional right of Ghanaians to elect a president which they so did on december 2012 being upheld and protected by the highest court of the land. It is fictitious to still think that Nana Addo will be Ghana's President after having followed the case so closely. Not even a re-run after the verdict and i can bet on that!
Ato 11 years ago

YOU ARE RIGHT. THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE GO AND VOTE IN THE SCORCHING SUN AND YOU WANT THEIR VOTES CANCELLED BECAUSE THE PRESIDING OFFICER OR PARTY AGENT FAILED OR FORGOT TO PUT HIS SIGNATURE ON THE TALLY SHEET. MEANWHILE NO ONE EL ...
read full comment

YOU ARE RIGHT. THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE GO AND VOTE IN THE SCORCHING SUN AND YOU WANT THEIR VOTES CANCELLED BECAUSE THE PRESIDING OFFICER OR PARTY AGENT FAILED OR FORGOT TO PUT HIS SIGNATURE ON THE TALLY SHEET. MEANWHILE NO ONE ELSE WHO HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE ELECTION HAD RAISED ANY OBJECTIONS. WHERE IS JUSTICE THEN?
Barima Yaw 11 years ago

So what?

So what?
Kwobia ( Toronto ) 11 years ago

Thanks for live telecast Ghanains found out the truth for themselves.Spin doctoring will not work.All the Mouth Pieces can go to hell.

Thanks for live telecast Ghanains found out the truth for themselves.Spin doctoring will not work.All the Mouth Pieces can go to hell.
osei yaw - london 11 years ago

The Supreme Court Judges were generous to look at NPP's a bit of an idiot Akyem Akufo Ado and his lot's petition

- Akufo Ado's lot went to the Supreme Court on the count of valid and spoilt votes backed by a provision in a ...
read full comment

The Supreme Court Judges were generous to look at NPP's a bit of an idiot Akyem Akufo Ado and his lot's petition

- Akufo Ado's lot went to the Supreme Court on the count of valid and spoilt votes backed by a provision in a Constitution; but, the Interpretation of the the Constitution shows that the grounds of Akufo Ado's lot is not a sort of "Evil" the Constitution is meant to "Cure"

- Afari Gyan disregarded the spoilt votes to declare Mahama the President with the valid votes; with a general election conducted peacefully and fairly; and legally, since

- Ghana is not a tyrannical State for having regard to Organs of State and Separation of Powers, the Declaration of Afari Gyan binds the State of Ghana including the Supreme Court; and the Supreme Court has no powers to install Akufo Ado as President in place of elected Mahama

- Luther and brilliant Tsikata have little to submit

Osei Wusu-Khanin / osei yaw - london
Nana Otchere 11 years ago

Omg .....please , research before u make a comment...or maybe , you know the truth but have closed ur eyes.go and readthe constitution again and find out whose pronuncements binds everybody...woow

Omg .....please , research before u make a comment...or maybe , you know the truth but have closed ur eyes.go and readthe constitution again and find out whose pronuncements binds everybody...woow
right 2 cast vote is sacred-Akufo Add 11 years ago

An unmeritorious case brought in BAD FAITH to disenfranchised Ghanaians in exercising their inviolable right of choosing a leader so that one man, Nana Addo, can achieve a life-long ambition of becoming the president is NO ju ...
read full comment

An unmeritorious case brought in BAD FAITH to disenfranchised Ghanaians in exercising their inviolable right of choosing a leader so that one man, Nana Addo, can achieve a life-long ambition of becoming the president is NO justice, but injustice in the superlative order and goes to demonstrate how egoistic and arrogant the man in question is. Wait for TRUE justice which is the sacred constitutional right of Ghanaians to elect a president which they so did on december 2012 being upheld and protected by the highest court of the land. It is fictitious to still think that Nana Addo will be Ghana's President after having followed the case so closely. Not even a re-run after the verdict and i can bet on that!
Abram Abraham 11 years ago

Mr. Osei Yaw, you are perfectly right. The Respondents have very little to write. Mr. Osei Yaw, when we vote in the UK, we don't witness the counting process, do we? However, when the results are announced no one raises issue ...
read full comment

Mr. Osei Yaw, you are perfectly right. The Respondents have very little to write. Mr. Osei Yaw, when we vote in the UK, we don't witness the counting process, do we? However, when the results are announced no one raises issues of Fraud or irregularities. Indeed the Ghanaians in the UK do not raise such issues.

The voting process in Ghana is one of the most transparent in the whole world! You see, Nana Akufo Addo has taken the issue of illiteracy in Ghana to foment trouble.His initial intention was not to go to court but to incite his mostly illiterate followers to vandalise property in order to make the country ungovernable.Bravo to the NDC leadership who advised their followers to stay put and never to confront them face to face.This good advice prevented anarchy in the country.The NPP leadership planned to trick the NDC followers into confrontation.

Thanks also to the International Criminal Court(ICC); Nana Akufo Addo remembered the issues in Rwanda, Liberia, Kenya and Ivory Coast and quickly noted that if he was not careful any anything untoward happened, he would be hauled to the ICC to face Criminal Charges.If you are in doubt of what I am saying, recall what he told his supporters at the OBRA SPOT. (A) Massive Fraud. (B) Vote Padding in favour of President Mahama. (C)Deducting of Votes from Nana Akufo Addo and crediting them to President Mahama. One of the NPP MP ladies (As a respect to his new Husband in the UK, I would not mention her name in order not to stir trouble in the Family) called Mr. Mahama a THIEF(JULO).

However, when they went to the Supreme Court they said the issues were CONSTITUTIONAL and STATUTORY violations and catalouged them as follows:

(1) OVER-VOTING ( as evidenced on the face of some PINK sheets)
(2) NO MACHINE VERIFICATION ( some polling stations voters did not go through machine verification as evidenced ON THE FACE OF SOME PINK SHEETS)
(3) UNSIGNED PINK SHEETS by some Presiding Officers( a total of about 4% of the 26,002 Presiding Officers)
(4)Two (2) separate and un-identical Polling Stations with SAME SERIAL numbers (different polling station Codes, different polling station names, different Presiding officers and different polling station agents).

The most astonishing demand by the Nana Akufo Addo ( a Lawyer) is that, at all the Polling Stations where on the face of the Ballots Accounting Section on the Pink Sheet all these administrative errors were detected, all the VOTERS should be dis-enfranchised and their votes cancelled in direct contravention of Article 42 of our 1992 Constitution!

Nana Akufo Addo has summed up the alleged violations to be 3,916,385 votes.Out of this total, President Mahama should be debited with 2,612,788 thus reducing his number of votes to 2,961,973 (5,574,761-2,612,788) which will give him 41.84% = 2,961,973/(10,995,262-3,916,385 = 7,078,877).

Nana Akufo Addo should also be debited with 1,228,229, thus bringing his total votes to 4,020,669 i.e (5,248,898 - 1,228,229). This would give him 56.80% and therefore won the elections! Very LAUGHABLE INDEED! The other parties should be debited with 75,368 thus bringing their total figure to 96,235 i.e (171,603-75,368)resulting to 1.97%

Let me give you further information per the NPP analysis:
Number of Votes cast = (10,995,262 + 251,720 rejected ballots)-3,916,385)=7,330,597.

Number of Registered voters were 14,031,795 according to EC's figures. Therefore according to the NPP, the turnout % was 52.52% instead of the EC's figure of 80.15% after dis-enfranchising 3,916,385 voters.

Most of the NPP supporters only know of what they heard at the OBRA spot by their Leaders.

NANA AKUFO ADDO SHOULD THEREFORE BE BOLD ENOUGH TO TELL THEM THE ISSUES THEY SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT VERDICT IS OUT.

MODERN 11 years ago

THANK YOU. THE ISSUE AND PROBLEM IS ABOUT THE ILLITERATES. AS FAR AS THEY ARE CONCERNED THE FIGURES YOU HAVE PROVIDED AND YOUR ANALYSIS ARE IRRELEVANT. THEIR JOB IS SIMPLY TO SHOUT AND INSULT. THEY ARE PRAISING GOD FOR LETTIN ...
read full comment

THANK YOU. THE ISSUE AND PROBLEM IS ABOUT THE ILLITERATES. AS FAR AS THEY ARE CONCERNED THE FIGURES YOU HAVE PROVIDED AND YOUR ANALYSIS ARE IRRELEVANT. THEIR JOB IS SIMPLY TO SHOUT AND INSULT. THEY ARE PRAISING GOD FOR LETTING THEM SEE THE PROCEEDINGS LIVE ON TV. BUT THEY DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING ARGUED. INDEED SOME OF THE LAWYERS OF THE PETITIONERS, I AM AFRAID, KNOW THAT THERE IS NO CASE. THEY ARE ONLY TRYING THEIR LUCK AND HOPING THAT SOME BODY MIGHT MAKE A BLUNDER AND HELP THEM. OR MAYBE THEY THINK THE JUDGES WILL FAVOR THEM IN THE SAME WAY SOME STRANGE CASES WERE WON BY THEM DURING THE PREVIOUS REGIME.
Worfa Yao 11 years ago

Nana Dazie and co, pls this time you have to take your time and do it ones and for all. This NPP lawyers seems to be smarter and more clever (in the eyes of every Ghanaian). So pls try to win this case for us. Atuguba can't h ...
read full comment

Nana Dazie and co, pls this time you have to take your time and do it ones and for all. This NPP lawyers seems to be smarter and more clever (in the eyes of every Ghanaian). So pls try to win this case for us. Atuguba can't help b,cos he is surrounded by NPP judges and even Mad Gina Wood.
KOFI DAMESI 11 years ago

AFAR GYAN BLEW IT BIG TIME BECAUSE HE NEVER FILED AN AFFIDAVIT BEFORE TESTIFYING AT THE COURT. AFARI GYAN COULDN'T BRING THE ORIGINALS OF THE PINK SHEET USED TO COLLATE THE RESULTS. HE EVEN COULDN'T BRING THE PINK SHEETS OF L ...
read full comment

AFAR GYAN BLEW IT BIG TIME BECAUSE HE NEVER FILED AN AFFIDAVIT BEFORE TESTIFYING AT THE COURT. AFARI GYAN COULDN'T BRING THE ORIGINALS OF THE PINK SHEET USED TO COLLATE THE RESULTS. HE EVEN COULDN'T BRING THE PINK SHEETS OF LEDZOKUKU, AND THE TECHIMAN NORTH CONSTITUENCIES. HE EVEN TOLD TOLD THE COURT THAT SPECIAL VOTING TOOK PLACE IN A VILLAGE IN ASSIN NORTH CONSTITUENCY, WHERE NO SPECIAL VOTING STAFFS WERE NEVER PRESENT. WHAT OF SAVULUGU IN THE NORTH WHERE THE EC AND AFARI GYAN MISLED THE COURT. TOGETHER WITH ASIEDU NKESTIA PRANKS AT THE COURT WE COULD SEE THAT THE ELECTIONS WERE RIGGED BIG TIME.
Apoopoo 11 years ago

The ruling party's magic show continues. By the Ghana Constitution provisions the Supreme Court has the absolute authority to overrule the Electoral Commission's declaration if indeed through the evidence it finds that the el ...
read full comment

The ruling party's magic show continues. By the Ghana Constitution provisions the Supreme Court has the absolute authority to overrule the Electoral Commission's declaration if indeed through the evidence it finds that the electoral processes as ascribed in the Ghana Constitution were not adhered to. This does not mean that the strict application of laws, rules, regulations is expected to be error free, but reasonable. The Supreme Court panel of nine, will be tasked to determine just what that "reasonable" factor would be. I would suggest that "reasonable" lies somewhere less than 5% of the total votes cast, but nowhere near 20 - 25% as the evidence may suggest.
Ato 11 years ago

Your name even suggests that you are not even qualified to suggest what that REASONABLE figure should be.

Your name even suggests that you are not even qualified to suggest what that REASONABLE figure should be.
Apoopoo 11 years ago

Somewhere around 40?

Somewhere around 40?
Woman's wisdom 11 years ago

Even if something went on wrong during the 2012 elections, the final verdict should not change the results.
Even if something went on wrong during the 2012 elections, the final verdict should not change the results.
Does th ...
read full comment

Even if something went on wrong during the 2012 elections, the final verdict should not change the results.
Even if something went on wrong during the 2012 elections, the final verdict should not change the results.
Does this man understand what he is trying to say? Or maybe he is an armed robber. It is like saying that even if someone stole your car, just let go and don't do anything about it. I don't know what he is trying to say but I remember when Afari Gyan's tilapia was stolen, the whole world got to know about it and the matter was brought to court for redress. How stupid can any statement be unless it reads as follows:Even if something went on wrong during the 2012 elections, the final verdict should not change the results.
GENERAL DeGAULE 11 years ago

Akuffo Addo's letter which was read in open court stated that everything else was administrative error and only the inalienable and constitutional right of the voter mattered. If for example 2 pink sheets have the same seria ...
read full comment

Akuffo Addo's letter which was read in open court stated that everything else was administrative error and only the inalienable and constitutional right of the voter mattered. If for example 2 pink sheets have the same serial number but can be referenced to different polling stations; the something that went wrong is the serial number but the people cannot be denied their vote. LET MY VOTE COUNT as Sammy Awuku would say.
Ato 11 years ago

Yes, the verdict (results ?) should not change if it happened that during the voting someone was caught wearing a party T shirt and giving instructions to voters. Such behaviour is not weighty enough to change the outcome.Sim ...
read full comment

Yes, the verdict (results ?) should not change if it happened that during the voting someone was caught wearing a party T shirt and giving instructions to voters. Such behaviour is not weighty enough to change the outcome.Simple logic and common sense.
ASEM BE BA DABI 11 years ago

They can even go to hell. Still the will lose.

They can even go to hell. Still the will lose.

Obibini 11 years ago

Denial, doubt then acceptance.
the NDC propaganda machine is up after the EC Chairman has been pounded to pulp to prepare their foot soldiers that even if there were irregularities resulting in their man being elected Presid ...
read full comment

Denial, doubt then acceptance.
the NDC propaganda machine is up after the EC Chairman has been pounded to pulp to prepare their foot soldiers that even if there were irregularities resulting in their man being elected President nothing must change. They are admitting the inevitable. Do you notice it is NDC propagandist that is on the offensive? Read Wereko Brobbey and JJ's comments today for nuance. NPP ano brebre.

Sure the SC will release the lock on the false trap soon.
GREAT NANA ANTWI 11 years ago

ARE YOU IN NEED OF A FAST POWERFULL SPIRITUALIST?THEN GO TO www greatnanapowerfullspiritualist blogspot.com

ARE YOU IN NEED OF A FAST POWERFULL SPIRITUALIST?THEN GO TO www greatnanapowerfullspiritualist blogspot.com

32 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

Tony Lithur and Tsikata to file separate addresses

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (32)

Read Comments Comments (32)