They are all as corrupt as mpepefuo govt of Mahama.
They are all as corrupt as mpepefuo govt of Mahama.
ELINAM 8 years ago
Who would have thought this? The next big titles Ghanaians would be running away from would be that of a BISHOP and OVERSEER.
Ghana shall be cleaned of criminal big title holders.
Who would have thought this? The next big titles Ghanaians would be running away from would be that of a BISHOP and OVERSEER.
Ghana shall be cleaned of criminal big title holders.
OLD SOLDIER 8 years ago
ARREST JUSTICE ATUGUBA.
ARREST JUSTICE ATUGUBA.
KWAA 8 years ago
Of course there is more money in the Church business than Judiciary, If the Church were to be a public entity and were to be investigated,all the Pastors will be in jail.Fact is,our society is rotten and we need a moral overh ... read full comment
Of course there is more money in the Church business than Judiciary, If the Church were to be a public entity and were to be investigated,all the Pastors will be in jail.Fact is,our society is rotten and we need a moral overhaul.
SAY IT LOUD ! 8 years ago
JUDGES TAKE BRIBES ONCE IN A BLUE MOON. PASTORS ROBB MURDER EVERYDAY.
TWIAAAAAAAA FUO !!
JUDGES TAKE BRIBES ONCE IN A BLUE MOON. PASTORS ROBB MURDER EVERYDAY.
TWIAAAAAAAA FUO !!
william 8 years ago
First, is it for him to 'allow' his wife...? Does he own her? Is she not an adult above 18?
Two, when the searchlight is turned on pastors and I hope soon, he would have wished he remained a medical doctor. Medical personnel ... read full comment
First, is it for him to 'allow' his wife...? Does he own her? Is she not an adult above 18?
Two, when the searchlight is turned on pastors and I hope soon, he would have wished he remained a medical doctor. Medical personnel and teachers are more into a vocation of GOD Almighty than 'self-acclaimed pastors!
MR TRUTH 8 years ago
THAT JUDGE MILES, ALLOWED A FRIEND TO LOCK MY BROTHER UP IN HIS HOUSE FOR 2 DAYS BECAUSE HE KNEW HER. THEN SHE QUICKLY BROUGHT THE CASE TO COURT AND PASSED SENTENCE AS SHE WISHED TO SHOW THAT SHE HAD POWER. WITH THE EXPOSE' W ... read full comment
THAT JUDGE MILES, ALLOWED A FRIEND TO LOCK MY BROTHER UP IN HIS HOUSE FOR 2 DAYS BECAUSE HE KNEW HER. THEN SHE QUICKLY BROUGHT THE CASE TO COURT AND PASSED SENTENCE AS SHE WISHED TO SHOW THAT SHE HAD POWER. WITH THE EXPOSE' WE ARE THINKING OF BRINGING THIS TO THE JUDIAL COUNCIL WHILE SHE IS NOW IN WEAK POSITION. WE COULDN'T DO ANYTHING BEFORE. GOD PUNISH HER.
GIRLZ GIRLZ 8 years ago
Your wife will not even qualify to be a judge so dont boast of not allowing her.
Are you the one who decide for her what she should do or not to do?
Your wife will not even qualify to be a judge so dont boast of not allowing her.
Are you the one who decide for her what she should do or not to do?
Richie W. 8 years ago
My bishop has not , and will never insult anyone. For those who think they have the right to insult him, must be on their feet and stand well, for their curses has already been manifested. Both their generations and generatio ... read full comment
My bishop has not , and will never insult anyone. For those who think they have the right to insult him, must be on their feet and stand well, for their curses has already been manifested. Both their generations and generations to come .
Though he has not open his mouth yet , but remember the command of Almighty God. TOUCH NOT MY ANOINTED and DO MY PROPHETS NO HARM.
Realms 8 years ago
All those speaking against true servants of God, you have shown your foolishness and destructive pride. Just pray God does not judge you for this. May God have mercy upon all of you. COCKROACHES
All those speaking against true servants of God, you have shown your foolishness and destructive pride. Just pray God does not judge you for this. May God have mercy upon all of you. COCKROACHES
kwasisei 8 years ago
And you are also religious? name-calling is un-christian. At least I'm smart enough not to be brainwashed with your stupid religious idealogies. Don't make God part of it. Pastors are worse than the justices, truth be told - ... read full comment
And you are also religious? name-calling is un-christian. At least I'm smart enough not to be brainwashed with your stupid religious idealogies. Don't make God part of it. Pastors are worse than the justices, truth be told - why christians are rather afraid of the truth! Taking advantage of an ignorant Ghanaian public is worse than bribery.
Realms 8 years ago
If u don't fear God, then you will die b4 your time. Cockroach
If u don't fear God, then you will die b4 your time. Cockroach
Charlie London 8 years ago
Realms, what a stupid, idiotic and primitive talk is that? Someone will die like a cockroach because they have challenged your pastor and your God? I pity you.do you know why? Because I think you are a motherfucker idiot who ... read full comment
Realms, what a stupid, idiotic and primitive talk is that? Someone will die like a cockroach because they have challenged your pastor and your God? I pity you.do you know why? Because I think you are a motherfucker idiot who gives all his money to pastors. You will rather die in poverty..
blue 8 years ago
yes that is true
yes that is true
Maurice Kidambi- Kenya 8 years ago
Dont talk arrogantly God will purnish you
Dont talk arrogantly God will purnish you
Asumadu 8 years ago
Why will your wife be a judge even if she qualifies. The amount of money you lot are getting in this church business is ridiculous. Speaking tongues and your so called miracles. Please shut up and continue to enjoy your boot ... read full comment
Why will your wife be a judge even if she qualifies. The amount of money you lot are getting in this church business is ridiculous. Speaking tongues and your so called miracles. Please shut up and continue to enjoy your booty.
JOHN MAHAMA'S BROTHER 8 years ago
ANYWAY, WE ARE ALSO WAITING FOR THAT MOVIE BY UK CHRISTIANS WRITTEN AND DIRECTED BY SAMMY ANKRAH (WHO THEY SAY IS AN NPP EXECUTIVE!) AIMED AT EXPOSING FAKE AND CORRUPT PASTORS. HOW I WISHED NAMES OF FAKE PASTORS WOULD BE MENT ... read full comment
ANYWAY, WE ARE ALSO WAITING FOR THAT MOVIE BY UK CHRISTIANS WRITTEN AND DIRECTED BY SAMMY ANKRAH (WHO THEY SAY IS AN NPP EXECUTIVE!) AIMED AT EXPOSING FAKE AND CORRUPT PASTORS. HOW I WISHED NAMES OF FAKE PASTORS WOULD BE MENTIONED IN THAT MOVIE AS WELL! CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO WATCH THIS YOUTUBE VIDEO ON THE MOVIE.
https://youtu.be/UOGk3PbFeGI
FAIRNESS 8 years ago
Georgina Woode must resign.
Georgina Woode must resign.
WARD GDX - WE THE PEOPLE 8 years ago
Our Mama, FirstLady of LCI works for God.
Don't associate her with that cesspool of corruption. Please.
Our Mama, FirstLady of LCI works for God.
Don't associate her with that cesspool of corruption. Please.
IDI AMIN DADA 8 years ago
BCOSE THOSE SO-CALLED PASTORS STEAL BIGGER MONIES FROM PEOPLE IN THE FORM OF SO-CALLED TITHES AND "OFFERINGSS" AND THEY OFTEN GET AWAY WITH IT, UNLIKE JUDGES. PASTORS INDEED!
BCOSE THOSE SO-CALLED PASTORS STEAL BIGGER MONIES FROM PEOPLE IN THE FORM OF SO-CALLED TITHES AND "OFFERINGSS" AND THEY OFTEN GET AWAY WITH IT, UNLIKE JUDGES. PASTORS INDEED!
Realms 8 years ago
All those speaking against true servants of God u have shown your foolishness and destructive pride. Just pray that God does not judge you for this evil u have done. May God have mercy upon all of you. COCKROACHES.
All those speaking against true servants of God u have shown your foolishness and destructive pride. Just pray that God does not judge you for this evil u have done. May God have mercy upon all of you. COCKROACHES.
Teiko 8 years ago
Please tell us who the true servants of God are???? Brainwashed fool!!!!You rather are showing your ignorant,foolishness and destructive pride.You cannot and do not decide who God Judges and so Bishop also???
Please tell us who the true servants of God are???? Brainwashed fool!!!!You rather are showing your ignorant,foolishness and destructive pride.You cannot and do not decide who God Judges and so Bishop also???
KnYc(USMC) 8 years ago
You backward thinker, when was the last time you made decision for GOD. You piece of shit, one man church deceiving poor people for your own gain. Maggot like you, God will hammer you.
You backward thinker, when was the last time you made decision for GOD. You piece of shit, one man church deceiving poor people for your own gain. Maggot like you, God will hammer you.
Realms 8 years ago
U know what knYc, I won't bother speaking wisdom unto u cos u are toooo... shallow in spiritual things. I just wanted to make all those COCKROACHES know that they were wrong but it seems some people want to justify their stu ... read full comment
U know what knYc, I won't bother speaking wisdom unto u cos u are toooo... shallow in spiritual things. I just wanted to make all those COCKROACHES know that they were wrong but it seems some people want to justify their stupid comments. U know what I can see some crooks do not have anything doing with their God given time and all they can do is 2 make me very important by speaking about Realms the graced one who has ACCESS to the THRONE ROOM of God, then so be it. u are blessed 4 all your views
Realms 8 years ago
Hahaha U know what KnYc (nat) , I won't bother speaking wisdom unto u cos I can see u are toooo shallow in spiritual things. Teiko u can insult me more just Bcoc I wanted those COCKROACHES to know that they were wrong. Oooooo ... read full comment
Hahaha U know what KnYc (nat) , I won't bother speaking wisdom unto u cos I can see u are toooo shallow in spiritual things. Teiko u can insult me more just Bcoc I wanted those COCKROACHES to know that they were wrong. Ooooooooo I can see you have nothing sensible doing with your God given time than to comment on the views from the deepest of realms. U want 2 know who you are looking at, U are looking @ REALMS the chosen one who has ACCESS to the THRONE ROOM of God. God bless you for your views.
Osono 8 years ago
U call yourself a servant of God ,pleading with God to forgive them of their sins.U end up calling them cockroaches. Who r u? U r an ass kisser who shower praises on these corrupt pastors. U should rather repent n a get a job ... read full comment
U call yourself a servant of God ,pleading with God to forgive them of their sins.U end up calling them cockroaches. Who r u? U r an ass kisser who shower praises on these corrupt pastors. U should rather repent n a get a job.
Bernice 8 years ago
May God forgive you for saying that to pastors
May God forgive you for saying that to pastors
Kwame 8 years ago
Your wife needs permission to do what she wants? And there's no corruption in the very many churches in Ghana? Anas hopefully will get to you all next...
Your wife needs permission to do what she wants? And there's no corruption in the very many churches in Ghana? Anas hopefully will get to you all next...
Realms 8 years ago
It is you that God will deal with 4 disrespecting a true servants Of God. Hw dare the demon in u
It is you that God will deal with 4 disrespecting a true servants Of God. Hw dare the demon in u
Kofi Abrefa 8 years ago
Hmmmm look at this man. So who is Ivy and how is she related to you???
Hmmmm look at this man. So who is Ivy and how is she related to you???
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Agohzohneeh J 8 years ago
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
Realms 8 years ago
U are a cockroach for asking such a stupid and needless question
U are a cockroach for asking such a stupid and needless question
Isaac godson 8 years ago
To say you wouldn't have allowed your wife to be a judge if she so wishes is unfair and backward. We need to empower women to aspire for higher laurels. May be the reporter misquoted you.
To say you wouldn't have allowed your wife to be a judge if she so wishes is unfair and backward. We need to empower women to aspire for higher laurels. May be the reporter misquoted you.
ELINAM 8 years ago
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
ELINAM 8 years ago
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
ELINAM 8 years ago
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
ELINAM 8 years ago
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
ELINAM 8 years ago
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
ELINAM 8 years ago
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
ELINAM 8 years ago
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
Great Mind 8 years ago
An uneducated fool. He thought his wife is private property. What if his wife want to be a judge?
An uneducated fool. He thought his wife is private property. What if his wife want to be a judge?
knii jr 8 years ago
I cant believe you call yourself great mind.you call this wisdom of yours great.this is the wisdom of the world and God calls it foolishness so what have i got to say about it.
I cant believe you call yourself great mind.you call this wisdom of yours great.this is the wisdom of the world and God calls it foolishness so what have i got to say about it.
Realms 8 years ago
U dare insult a true servants of God in that manner? U have xposed the dirty demon in u. If your unseen enemies succeed in destroying u it is your fault. A cockroach who has no respect 4 servants of God. Mercy on your head
U dare insult a true servants of God in that manner? U have xposed the dirty demon in u. If your unseen enemies succeed in destroying u it is your fault. A cockroach who has no respect 4 servants of God. Mercy on your head
Chris 8 years ago
IF you insult a man of God,you may think you are running with freedom of expression and civilization but God will forgive you anyway but be careful.
For your information,Bishop Dag-Heward Mills is a trained medical doctor.
... read full comment
IF you insult a man of God,you may think you are running with freedom of expression and civilization but God will forgive you anyway but be careful.
For your information,Bishop Dag-Heward Mills is a trained medical doctor.
Touch not my and do my prophet no harm.
Careful,you are threading on dangerous grounds.
Bernice 8 years ago
what is wrong with u god will deal with u in spirit u will reg
ret for insulting him
what is wrong with u god will deal with u in spirit u will reg
ret for insulting him
Mokobi 8 years ago
I am thinking she she should rather be a judge and be a good example of one. Bible says "let your light shine before men that they may see your good works and give glory to God"
Go for the bench if you can make a difference! ... read full comment
I am thinking she she should rather be a judge and be a good example of one. Bible says "let your light shine before men that they may see your good works and give glory to God"
Go for the bench if you can make a difference!!
Odasani 8 years ago
To paraphrase, I will never let my wife be a judge, even if she wanted to: It is nice to know your wife's opinion does not matter, Bishop.
To paraphrase, I will never let my wife be a judge, even if she wanted to: It is nice to know your wife's opinion does not matter, Bishop.
Sunshine 8 years ago
If the pastor is speaking biblical as head of the house and therefore assuming he knows what is best for his wife then I get it ...But in reality that notion is bullocks in today's world where woman are earning their own mone ... read full comment
If the pastor is speaking biblical as head of the house and therefore assuming he knows what is best for his wife then I get it ...But in reality that notion is bullocks in today's world where woman are earning their own money ....
BOWONDA 8 years ago
Hi Sunshine, Thanks. It is not only that many women are earning their own money but many are actually the Bread Winners and they work harder than many men! Again, they are often more intelligent than the men so these 'Biblica ... read full comment
Hi Sunshine, Thanks. It is not only that many women are earning their own money but many are actually the Bread Winners and they work harder than many men! Again, they are often more intelligent than the men so these 'Biblical Statements' have to be understood anew. This is what Scripture is there for. Yes, the CORE TEXT cuts across TIME and SPACE but the Interpretation of MUCH of it should live up to the CONTEXT otherwise it might not make sense.
If we take the Scripture as 'The Word of God', when He was saying these things HE knew beforehand that there would be an age called the Twenty-First Century when the situation would be different and hence He expected that human beings reading His Word would be able to understand it as ESSENTIALLY TRUE even in the Twenty-First Century! For a 'Whole Bishop' to tell us that he would not have allowed his wife to be at the Bench even if she wanted to, without clarification, is nothing but a TRAGEDY!
MB 8 years ago
This so called bishop talks too much and unnecessary all the time especially when he tries to get himself heard.
This so called bishop talks too much and unnecessary all the time especially when he tries to get himself heard.
pearl 4rm DC 8 years ago
master seek for wisdom n dnt talk anyhow.
master seek for wisdom n dnt talk anyhow.
MB 8 years ago
This so called bishop talks too much and unnecessary all the time especially when he tries to get himself heard.
This so called bishop talks too much and unnecessary all the time especially when he tries to get himself heard.
Loyalty n disloyalty 8 years ago
u arr a big FOOOOOOOL!!! Kwasea!! ogyimifuo!
may GOD hv mercy on u
if it not dat his mercy endureth forever u would hv been dead by now and u will even miss hell .onyeeeee gbemi !!
u arr a big FOOOOOOOL!!! Kwasea!! ogyimifuo!
may GOD hv mercy on u
if it not dat his mercy endureth forever u would hv been dead by now and u will even miss hell .onyeeeee gbemi !!
Dadzie 8 years ago
so you go to LCI to learn "onyee gbemi" things???
so you go to LCI to learn "onyee gbemi" things???
Africa 8 years ago
Very sad of your comments too, insulting someone because you dont agree with their comments doesnt make you any different from them perhaps you need the living word of God that can transform your hearts instead of the everyda ... read full comment
Very sad of your comments too, insulting someone because you dont agree with their comments doesnt make you any different from them perhaps you need the living word of God that can transform your hearts instead of the everyday loyalty and disloyalty surmmons that turn you people into a bunch of hypocrates!
Watch out 8 years ago
U are not being a good example
U are not being a good example
George Ata Adu 8 years ago
Bishop Dag is right.Shame unto Ghana's judiciary.It's even support the fact that the court case on election rigging between Nana Akuffo Addo and president Manama was not based on fair judgment.
.
Bishop Dag is right.Shame unto Ghana's judiciary.It's even support the fact that the court case on election rigging between Nana Akuffo Addo and president Manama was not based on fair judgment.
.
RA 8 years ago
Are we still living in the dark ages for you to determine your wife's occupation? Your comment is sexist and wrong if this is how think. Please set good examples consistently not selectively.
Are we still living in the dark ages for you to determine your wife's occupation? Your comment is sexist and wrong if this is how think. Please set good examples consistently not selectively.
LCI Menmber 8 years ago
Please visit our website www.lighthousechapel.org and find a church near you. God Blessisngs
Please visit our website www.lighthousechapel.org and find a church near you. God Blessisngs
Lighthouse Member 8 years ago
We Love Our Church and We Love Our Bishop Dag, His Wife, All the other Bishops and everyone.
We Love Our Church and We Love Our Bishop Dag, His Wife, All the other Bishops and everyone.
Adepa 8 years ago
lol, our bishop and his wife? ??What happened to our God? He is the only one to be revered. Stop worshipping humans! Even Jesus, who was God's only begotten son wasn't worshipped and didn't take on ridiculous titles.
lol, our bishop and his wife? ??What happened to our God? He is the only one to be revered. Stop worshipping humans! Even Jesus, who was God's only begotten son wasn't worshipped and didn't take on ridiculous titles.
knii jr 8 years ago
I wonder why the writer of this article never thought it wise to write an article on the message Bishop Dag preached about.No i know why, just to please man.
Here you are working to please man and you are here saying nonsens ... read full comment
I wonder why the writer of this article never thought it wise to write an article on the message Bishop Dag preached about.No i know why, just to please man.
Here you are working to please man and you are here saying nonsense about someone who is working to please God.Foolish galatians.
You stand in dangerous zones in war areas just to please man.And here you are talking about someone who go to war driven dangerous countries to preach the Gospel of Christ.Someone who sacrificed his 7 yrs in medical school for the work of God and you dont believe he can sacrifice the career of his wife for God?
Foolish galatians your wisdom shall fail you and you will say we are fools.becareful the way you speak especially against a man of God.
Mr editor next time post the sermon and maybe you would have won even a soul for God rather than turning souls against God.
Hey guys do well to get the message he preached last sunday.he preached about OTHERS maybe the you will learn to live for others.
pearl 4rm DC 8 years ago
young man u really lack respect. u jxt open ur mouth n talk anyhow bcos a man was talkn abt corruption n he wont allow his wife to join such office n u ar sayn wat .u are a serious foooooool.
young man u really lack respect. u jxt open ur mouth n talk anyhow bcos a man was talkn abt corruption n he wont allow his wife to join such office n u ar sayn wat .u are a serious foooooool.
pearl 4rm DC 8 years ago
you are a fooool.
you are a fooool.
knii jr 8 years ago
Come to LCI come learn the wisdom of God not the wisdom of man and do well to read your Bible not those books coz they are actually corrupting your mind
Come to LCI come learn the wisdom of God not the wisdom of man and do well to read your Bible not those books coz they are actually corrupting your mind
Anagkazo 8 years ago
Church De Sweet pahpah
Church De Sweet pahpah
Benny 8 years ago
Ok lucky, Ran Ran Anas is coming tomorrow it will be the preachers and pastors so called bring a white hankerchiefs turn .
Ok lucky, Ran Ran Anas is coming tomorrow it will be the preachers and pastors so called bring a white hankerchiefs turn .
Wisdom 8 years ago
We are Emmanuel borborbor group located at Abeka Lapas, contact Wisdom on 0209158777 for any information towards your outdooring, wedding, funeral or any party event for best performance.
Contact Wisdom on 0209158777
Thank ... read full comment
We are Emmanuel borborbor group located at Abeka Lapas, contact Wisdom on 0209158777 for any information towards your outdooring, wedding, funeral or any party event for best performance.
Contact Wisdom on 0209158777
Thank you.
Ametsitsi 8 years ago
Dag appears interesting indeed!!! Pastors of his type are worse culprits; we are all seeing what is happening in our churches. He should better shut up and enjoy his riches.
Dag appears interesting indeed!!! Pastors of his type are worse culprits; we are all seeing what is happening in our churches. He should better shut up and enjoy his riches.
Richman 8 years ago
You wanna lose weight, ask me HOW? Am Richman, a certified Fitness Personal Trainer from "Reebok University". Call on me for your weight lost program, diet plan and all you need to know about wellness.
Tel: +233 268705547
You wanna lose weight, ask me HOW? Am Richman, a certified Fitness Personal Trainer from "Reebok University". Call on me for your weight lost program, diet plan and all you need to know about wellness.
Tel: +233 268705547
JOHN MAHAMA'S BROTHER 8 years ago
WE ARE ALSO WAITING FOR THAT MOVIE BY UK CHRISTIANS WRITTEN AND DIRECTED BY SAMMY ANKRAH (WHO THEY SAY IS AN NPP EXECUTIVE!) AIMED AT EXPOSING FAKE AND CORRUPT PASTORS. HOW I WISHED NAMES OF FAKE PASTORS WOULD BE MENTIONED IN ... read full comment
WE ARE ALSO WAITING FOR THAT MOVIE BY UK CHRISTIANS WRITTEN AND DIRECTED BY SAMMY ANKRAH (WHO THEY SAY IS AN NPP EXECUTIVE!) AIMED AT EXPOSING FAKE AND CORRUPT PASTORS. HOW I WISHED NAMES OF FAKE PASTORS WOULD BE MENTIONED IN THAT MOVIE AS WELL! CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO WATCH THIS YOUTUBE VIDEO ON THE MOVIE.
https://youtu.be/UOGk3PbFeGI
THE TRUTH 8 years ago
MAN OF GOD, YOU DONT NEED TO WORRY YOURSELF AND TALK MUCH. YOUR WIFE'S NAME IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE NAME MENTIONED WITH THE FIRST NAME.
... read full comment
MAN OF GOD, YOU DONT NEED TO WORRY YOURSELF AND TALK MUCH. YOUR WIFE'S NAME IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE NAME MENTIONED WITH THE FIRST NAME.
EVEN ON FACEBOOK I BEAR THE SAME FIRST NAME AND SURNAME NAME WITH SOMEONE I DONT EVEN KNOW.
LET THE IGNORANT PEOPLE TALK AGAINST YOU AND YOUR WIFE BUT GOD WILL ALWAYS VINDICATE YOU.
CONCERN PEOPLE OF GHANA WORLD WIDE 8 years ago
OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUSTICE, DEAR MADAM , THE 11 JUDDERS WHO HAVE PROVED TO THE WORLD THAT THEIR NOT CORRUPT, LOVE GHANA, GHANAIAN S, LOVE THEIR COUNTRY SHOULD BE ELEVATED, PROMOTED AND MADE HEROES FOR THE WHOLE WORLD T ... read full comment
OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUSTICE, DEAR MADAM , THE 11 JUDDERS WHO HAVE PROVED TO THE WORLD THAT THEIR NOT CORRUPT, LOVE GHANA, GHANAIAN S, LOVE THEIR COUNTRY SHOULD BE ELEVATED, PROMOTED AND MADE HEROES FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO SEE,. GHANA PEOPLE ARE PROUD OF THEM.
THE REST SHOULD BE THE GIVEN FAIR TRY AND IF FOUND GUILTY SHOULD BE GIVEN THE GREATEST PRISON SENTENCE IN THE HISTORY OF THE GHANA FOR COMING GENERATION TO SEE,HEAR AND READ, GHANA IS NOW AT A CROSS ROAD AND OUR DESTINY IS IN OUR OWN HAND, GHANA PEOPLE WANT TRUTH AND JUSTICE, GOD BLESS GHANA .FROM CONCERN PEOPLE OF GHANA ALL OVER THE WORLD
OSAMAN BIN KARIM 8 years ago
ARE THE BISHOPS ANY LESS CORRUPT? I DOUBT IT
ARE THE BISHOPS ANY LESS CORRUPT? I DOUBT IT
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, ESQ. 8 years ago
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, BARRISTER-AT LAW, QCL, PLC, DPA, CPA, BA (HONS) {GHANA}, MASTER OF LAWS (LLM) {NEW YORK, USA} PENDING, MEMBER, INTERNATIONAL (WORLD/GLOBAL) BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSO ... read full comment
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, BARRISTER-AT LAW, QCL, PLC, DPA, CPA, BA (HONS) {GHANA}, MASTER OF LAWS (LLM) {NEW YORK, USA} PENDING, MEMBER, INTERNATIONAL (WORLD/GLOBAL) BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATE MEMBER, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, GHANA BAR ASSOCIATION
EBAA LAW CONSULT
ORCA DECO (TOKU) BUILDING, 1ST
FLOOR
P.O. BOX AN 5966
ACCRA.
GHANA.
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER photo BenonyTonyAmekudzi2.jpg
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT
TEL: 0545758633
MOBILE NO: 0245848560
NOTE: (SENDING THIS E-MAIL AT HO IN THE VOLTA REGION OF GHANA)
TO: HER LADYSHIP CHIEF JUSTICE OF GHANA GEORGINA THEODORA WOOD
HON. MINISTER OF JUSTICE & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GHANA MARIETTA BREW
APPIAH OPPONG
HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT ADINYIRA
HON. PRESIDENT OF GHANA BAR ASSOCIATION NENE AMEGATCHER
INFO TO:
H.E.PRESIDENT OF GHANA DR.JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA
H.E.VICE PRESIDENT OF GHANA KWESI AMISSAH ARTHUR
RT.HON.SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT OF GHANA EDWARD DOE ADZAHO
HON. MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS & REGIONAL INTEGRATION HANNAH TETTEY
HON. MINISTER OF INTERIOR
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF GHANA POLICE SERVICE MOHAMMED ALHASSAN
DIRECTOR OF BNI
SPECIAL INFO ALERT TO:
H.E.DR.MR.PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARACK OBAMA
HON. SECRETARY OF STATE OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JOHN KERRY
DIRECTOR OF FBI
DATE: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2015
SUBJECT: AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND STAFF OF THE JUDICIAL SERVICE PURPORTED TO BE IMPLICATED BY THE SECRET VIDEO EXPOSE OF ANAS AMEREYAW ANAS TAKING COGNIZANCE OF ARTICLE 18 (2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION, THE EVIDENCE ACT AND THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF DECLARATIONS OF FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS, THERETO.
IT IS A TRITE LAW AND KNOWLEDGE THAT ANYTHING THAT TOUCHES AND CONCERNS "VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IS EQUALLY WRONG TO ADOPT "ILLEGAL AND CLANDESTINE SECRET MEANS TO OBTAIN ILLEGAL MATERIAL".
IT IS THEREFORE IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE THAT I AM RESPECTFULLY REFERRING TO ANAS AMEREYAW PHOTOGRAPHS BELOW AS EXAMPLE OF SOME OF THE ILLEGAL AND SECRET CLANDESTINE METHODS ADOPTED TO OBTAIN ILLEGAL MATERIALS/EVIDENCE, THERETO, BELOW:
Anas Aremeyaw Anas's photo.
Anas Aremeyaw Anas's photo.
Anas Aremeyaw Anas added 2 new photos — with Ibrahim Mohammed Hashimudeen and 8 others.
Anas Aremeyaw Anas Masked
Anas Aremeyaw Anas
IT IS THEREFORE AT THESE RELATED BACKDROPS THAT I AM AGAIN REVISITING AND TO PUT SAME IN ISSUE THE CASE THAT I HAVE ALREADY MADE AS FOLLOWS:
RE: THE LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE ANAS AREMEYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE 34 JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND 100 JUDICIAL STAFFS AND THE LEGAL POSITIONS AS A WAY FORWARD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA JURISPRUDENCE.REFRESHING MEMORIES AND UPDATE NOTES FOR THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PROTECTION OF ARTICLE 18 CLAUSES 1 & 2 OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF DECLARATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND
TAKING ALSO COGNIZANCE OF THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS AS FOLLOWS:
UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS
"Article 12.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour/honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks."
THAT A CLEAR CLASSICS CASES THAT CALL FOR THE PROTECTIONS OF SUCH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW RELATED RIGHTS ARE THE SECRET VIDEO TAPE RECORDINGS OF THE FOLLOWING WORLD LEADERS WHEN HIS/HER EXCELLENCIES WERE EVEN AT THE TOILETS AND THEIR PRIVACY WERE VIOLATED BY THE "SECRET ILLEGAL VIDEO RECORDERS FOR MISCHIEF AND OTHER CRIMINAL RELATED INTENDED PURPOSES, THERETO, AS FOLLOWS:
(i) H.E.DR.MR.PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARACK OBAMA
(ii) HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II
(iii) HIS PAPACY HOLY FATHER POPE FRANCIS !
(iv) H.E.RT.HON.PRIME MINISTER OF UNITED KINGDOM DAVID CAMERON
(v) H.E.PRESIDENT OF FRANCE FRANCOIS HOLLANDE
(vi) H.E. GERMAN CHANCELLOR ANGELA MERKEL
(vii) H.E.RT.HON.PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL BENJAMIN NETANYAHU
(viii)H.E.PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA VLADAMIR PUTIN
(ix) H.E. UNITED NATIONS SECRETARY GENERAL BAN-KI MOON
(x) HON. DALA MAI
THAT IT IS AGAINST THESE RELATED BACKDROPS THAT THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF GHANA, GOVERNMENT OF GHANA AND THE CIVILIZED WORLD TO CONSIDER IN THE BEST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW INTERESTS TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS TO PRIVACY TO HELP REMOVE THE THREAT IT POSES TO THE CIVILIZED WORLD WHILE TO ADOPT A MORE OPEN AND TRANSPARENT MEANS AND WAYS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION AND CORRUPT PRACTICES NOT ONLY IN GHANA BUT ALSO IN THE CIVILIZED WORLD.
HOWEVER, MY RESPECTFUL SUBMISSION IS NOT INTENDED TO PLAY DOWN ON ANAS AMEREYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS INVESTIGATIONS SINCE "IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSED OF THE LAW" BUT TO HELP TO ENCOURAGE HIM AND OTHERS WITH GOODWILL AND GOOD INTENTIONS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION AND CORRUPT PRACTICES TO DO IT WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF THE LAW, THERETO.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
GOD BLESS GHANA, AMERICA, UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED NATIONS.
VERY TRULY YOURS,
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, ESQ.
INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT
From: benony amekudzi
To: Info ; President ; "Minister@Moj.gov.gh" ; President ; Info ; Barack Obama ; "secretary@state.gov" ; "Minister@Mfa.gov.gh" ; Vice ; "vicepresidents@whitehouse.gov" ; GovDelivery ; "president@ghanabar.org" ; White House ; BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI ; Pm ; "speaker@parliament.gh" ; "firstlady@oop.gov.gh" Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 4:31 AM Subject: THE LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE ANAS AREMEYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE 34 JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND 100 JUDICIAL STAFFS AND THE LEGAL POSITIONS AS A WAY FORWARD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA JURISPRUDENCE.
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, BARRISTER-AT LAW, QCL, PLC, DPA, CPA, BA (HONS) {GHANA}, MASTER OF LAWS (LLM) {NEW YORK, USA} PENDING, MEMBER, INTERNATIONAL (WORLD/GLOBAL) BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATE MEMBER, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, GHANA BAR ASSOCIATION
EBAA LAW CONSULT
ORCA DECO (TOKU) BUILDING, 1ST
FLOOR
P.O. BOX AN 5966
ACCRA.
GHANA.
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER photo BenonyTonyAmekudzi2.jpg
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT
TEL: 0545758633
MOBILE NO: 0245848560
NOTE: (SENDING THIS E-MAIL AT HO IN THE VOLTA REGION OF GHANA)
TO: HER LADYSHIP CHIEF JUSTICE OF GHANA GEORGINA THEODORA WOOD
HON. MINISTER OF JUSTICE & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GHANA MARIETTA BREW APPIAH-OPPONG
HON. JUDICIAL SECRETARY OF GHANA
HON. PRESIDENT OF GHANA BAR ASSOCIATION NENE AMEGATCHER
INFO TO:
H.E.PRESIDENT OF GHANA DR. JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA
H.E.VICE PRESIDENT OF GHANA KWESI AMISSAH ARTHUR
RT. HON. SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT OF GHANA EDWARD DOE ADZAHO
HON. MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS & REGIONAL INTEGRATION HANNAH TETTEY
HON. MINISTER OF VOLTA REGION OF GHANA HELEN ADJOA NTOSU
SPECIAL INFO ALERT TO:
H.E.DR.MR.PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARACK OBAMA
H.E. RT. HON.PRIME MINISTER OF UNITED KINGDOM DAVID CAMERON
HON. SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH
HON. SECRETARY OF STATE OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JOHN KERRY
DATE: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2015
HON. CHIEF OF STAFF AT FLAGSTAFF HOUSE JULIUS DEBRAH
SUBJECT:THE LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE ANAS AREMEYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE 34 JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND 100 JUDICIAL STAFFS AND THE LEGAL POSITIONS AS A WAY FORWARD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA JURISPRUDENCE.
MAY I RESPECTFULLY AND HUMBLY SUBMIT MY CANDID OPINION ON THE ABOVE RELATED DICEY MATTER FIRST AS A GHANAIAN LAWYER WHO ALSO BELONGED TO OTHER BAR ASSOCIATIONS AND AS INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT.
THAT IT IS A TRITE LAW AND KNOWLEDGE THAT MATTERS/ISSUES THAT HINGED ON THE LAW ARE DEEMED TO SEEN AND TO BE TREATED FROM THE LEGAL "PAR LANCE" PERSPECTIVE POINTS OF LEGAL VIEWS.
THIS IS BECAUSE MATTERS CONCERNING LAW AND MORALS ARE SEEN DIFFERENTLY SO FAR AS THE LAW IS CONCERNED.
IT IS THEREFORE IN THE LIGHT OF ABOVE THAT THE LAWS OF GHANA AS OTHER LAWS OF OTHER COUNTRIES ARE ALSO CODIFIED OR WRITTEN, THERETO.
THAT THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF GHANA BELONG TO THE "COMMON LAW TRADITION/JURISDICTION" AND FOR THAT MATTER THE "COMMON LAW" IS PART OF THE LAWS OF GHANA AND GHANA CAN THEREFORE RESERVED THE RIGHT TO CITE OR USE THE CASE LAWS OF THE "COMMON LAW JURISDICTIONS".
THAT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND UNITED KINGDOM AS OTHER COUNTRIES BELONGED TO THE "COMMON LAW TRADITIONS/JURISDICTIONS" AND THEREFORE GHANA JUDICIAL AND LEGAL SYSTEMS CAN AND COULD CITE CASE LAWS FROM THESE JURISDICTIONS AS "PERSUASIVE AUTHORITIES", THERETO.
THAT TAKING COGNIZANCE ALSO OF THE FACT THAT GHANA IS A SIGNITORIES TO INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND CONVENTIONS UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH, UNITED NATIONS, AFRICAN UNION, ECOWAS AND OTHERS, THERETO.
HOWEVER, IT IS SUFFICIENT JUST TO CITE ONLY THESE FEW INSTANCES ABOVE AND TO RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT THAT "ALL APPLICABLE LAWS ARE DEEM TO APPLY TO A CASE AT THE COURTS OF LAW WHENEVER, THERE IS ENSUING LITIGATION, THERETO.
THAT UNDER GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION, CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW AND THE EVIDENCE ACT INCLUDING THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ARE DEEM TO APPLY TO THE CASE OF ANAS AMEREYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF GHANA 34 JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND OVER 100 JUDICIAL STAFF PURPORTED TO BE SECRETLY VIDEO BY ANS THAT ALLEGED CORRUPTION AND CORRUPT PRACTICES OF THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND THE JUDICIAL STAFF AS PUBLISHED BELOW BY THE "STARR FM ONLINE".
THAT AS A GHANAIAN LAWYER, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER AND LEGAL CONSULTANT THAT IT BEHOOVES ON ME TO RENDER MY CANDID LEGAL OPINION ON THE MATTER TO HELP IN THE EXPOSITION OF THE LEGAL POSITIONS ON THE MATTER TO HELP ADVANCE THE COURSE/CAUSE OF JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW.
THAT GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION CLEARLY PROVIDES FOR THE PROTECTION OF PRIVACY OF HOMES AND PROPERTY AS FOLLOWS:
GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION
PROTECTION OF PRIVACY OF HOME AND OTHER PROPERTY
"
18. (1) Every person has the right to own property either alone or in association with others.
(2) No person shall be subjected to interference with the privacy of his home, property, correspondence or communication except in accordance with law and as may be necessary in a free and democratic society for public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the protection of the rights or freedoms of others "
THAT FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF ANY RELATED DOUBTS, WHATSOEVER, THAT I PERSONALLY WILL NEVER CONDONE CRIME AND MOREOVER TO PURPORT TO DEFEND CRIME, HOWEVER, AS GHANAIAN LAWYER, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND LEGAL CONSULTANT IT BEHOOVES ON ME TO HELP STATE THE POSITIONS OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND ALL OTHER LAWS THAT ARE DEEM TO APPLY TO THE CASE UNDER REVIEW AND IN VIEW ALSO OF THE POSITIONS OF
THE SAME LAWS PROTECTING ANAS AMEREYAW WHEN HE UNDERTOOK THAT ONEROUS RESPONSIBILITY, THERETO.
THAT IT IS IN VIEW OF SUCH LEGAL ANALYSIS THAT CLEARLY CALLS TO ISSUE TO PROPER AND TRUE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 18 (2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION THAT PROVIDES FOR
No person shall be subjected to interference with the privacy of his home, property, correspondence or communication except in accordance with law and as may be necessary in a free and democratic society for public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the protection of the rights or freedoms of others "
IT IS IN LIGHT OF THE ABOVE THAT MAKES ANAS AMEREYAW CASE VERY DICEY AND THE LEGAL ISSUE THEREFORE TO BE DETERMINED "WHETHER OR NOT BEFORE ANAS EMBARKED ON HIS SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS INVESTIGATIONS OF THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND OTHER JUDICIAL STAFF HE WAS SUPPOSED TO OBTAIN "A VALID COURT ORDER AS A PROTECTION?"
FURTHER, WHETHER OR NOT HIS PETITION TO H.E.PRESIDENT OF GHANA DR.JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA AND HON.MINISTER OF JUSTICE & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GHANA MARIETTA BREW APPIAH-OPPONG WHEN HE PRESENTED HIS SECRET INVESTIGATIONS REPORT AND HE WAS GRANTED "IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS" SERVED AS A RELIEF FROM NOT OBTAINING THE VALID COURT ORDER BEFORE EMBARKING ON THE SECRET INVESTIGATIONS, THERETO? OR THE "IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITIES HAS BEEN BACK DATED TO COVER THE BEGINNING OF THE SECRET INVESTIGATIONS, THERETO?"
IF YES, THEN WHAT IS THE POSITION OF THE RULE OF LAW? BUT IF THE ANSWER IS NO THEN WHAT IS THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS, THERETO?
THAT IT IS MY RESPECTFUL AND HUMBLE SUBMISSION THAT ANSWERS TO THE ABOVE RELATED QUESTIONS WILL HELP PAVE WAY TO THE RESOLUTIONS OR DETERMINATIONS OF THE ANAS CASE, THERETO.
THAT THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND LEGISLATIVE INTENT OF ARTICLE 18 CLAUSES1 & 2 TO BE TAKEN A JUDICIAL NOTICE AT WHEN BOTH GHANA JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND LAWYERS DEDICATED EVERY YEAR JUNE 30 AS "MATYRS DAY" AND DULY OBSERVED SAME SINCE OUR DEAR THREE (3) HIGH COURT JUSTICES AND ARMY OFFICER WERE ALL PICKED UP FROM THEIR VARIOUS HOUSES AND WERE MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD AND BURNT INTO ASHES INCLUDING THE LATE MR.ANKRA FROM AGORTIME- AFEGAME WHO WAS ALSO PICKED FROM HIS HOUSE AT NIGHT AND MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD AND ALSO BURNT IN ASHES. HOWEVER, HIS CASE NEVER RECEIVED NATIONAL ATTENTION AS IT OUGHT TO GAIN AT THE TIME.
THAT REALLY CALLS FOR THE NEED TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY OF HOMES AND PROPERTY.
THAT IN THE CASE OF CLEMENCE ATIASU VRS. THE REPUBLIC (SUIT NO.P22CLEMENT ATIA/9/2015) THAT CAME ON APPEAL AT THE HIGH COURT-2, HO IN THE VOLTA REGION OF GHANA PRESIDED OVER BY HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE PATRICK BAAYEH THAT SIMILAR ARGUMENTS WERE MADE BY ME WHEN I WAS THE COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT WHEN THE POLICE OF THE NARCOTIC UNIT FROM THE VOLTA REGIONAL POLICE HEADQUARTERS WITHOUT "A VALID SEARCH WARRANT" CONDUCTED AN ILLEGAL SEARCH AT 4.30AM AT THE APPELLANT HOUSE AT KPEDZE IN THE VOLTA REGION AT THE TIME THE APPELLANT JUST RETURNED FROM A FUNERAL AT AVE- DAKPA AT 9.30PM WHEN HE INTIMATED THAT SOMEONE POSED A THREAT AGAINST HIS LIFE THAT HE WAS GOING TO SHOW HIM AND AT DAWN POLICE OFFICERS FROM THE NARCOTICS UNIT CAME TO HIS HOUSE AND CONDUCTED ILLEGAL SEARCH AND RETRIEVED "CANIBIS" WHICH TESTED POSITIVE AND HE WAS CHARGED FOR CULTIVATION AND POSSESSION OF "CANIBIS SUBSTANCE".
THAT THE ARGUMENTS I MADE USING ARTICLE 18 (2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND THE EVIDENCE ACT AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW THAT THE HIGH COURT TO OVER-TURN THE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGEMENT AND TO ACQUIT AND DISCHARGE THE APPELLANT WAS REJECTED BY THE HIGH COURT AND EVEN THE CASE MADE ON THE APPELLANT SERIOUS HEALTH CONDITIONS REPORTED BY HO PRISON MEDIUM AUTHORITIES WAS ALSO REJECTED BY THE HIGH COURT.
HOWEVER, HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE PATRICK BAAYEH IN HIS JUDGEMENT CLEARLY STATED THAT IT IS ONLY H.E.PRESIDENT OF GHANA DR.JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA ALONE WHO CAN OR COULD GRANT THE APPELLANT PARDON.
IT IS THEREFORE, SURPRISING THAT THE APPELLANT HAS NOT BEEN GRANTED THE PARDON UPTIL NOW.
IT IS THEREFORE, MY RESPECTFUL AND HUMBLE SUBMISSION THAT LEGAL EFFECT TO BE GIVEN IN A FAIR MEANS AND MANNER TO THE INTERPRETATIONS AND APPLICATIONS OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND OTHER LAWS OF GHANA TAKING INTO CONTEMPLATION ALSO THE INTERNATIONAL LAW.
IT IS THEREFORE AT THESE RELATED BACKDROPS THAT I AM RESPECTFULLY OBLIGED TO REFER TO THE EVIDENCE ACT OF GHANA AND GHANA COMMUNICATIONS ACT AND HUMBLY SUBMIT AS FOLLOWS:
THAT SECTION 94 OF THE EVIDENCE ACT (ACT 30/60) DULY PROVIDES AGAINST "ILLEGAL SEARCHES, THAT IS, SEARCHES WITHOUT A VALID SEARCH WARRANT BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION".
THAT IN THE CASE OF ANAS WHO CONDUCTED A SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES IN QUESTION WITHOUT OBTAINING "A VALID COURT ORDER" IN VIEW OF THE EXCLUSIONARY EVIDENTIAL RULES THAT "ANY ILLEGAL MATERIAL OBTAINED THROUGH ILLEGAL MEANS THAT THE EVIDENTIAL ILLEGAL MATERIALS ARE EXCLUSIVE FROM THE RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND IF THEY ARE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE RECORDS IT SERVED AS "POISONOUS" UNDER THE "DOCTRINE OF THE POISONOUS TREE, A PRINCIPLE OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND IN GHANA UNDER THE EXCLUSIONARY EVIDENCE RULE THAT SUCH ILLEGAL OBTAINED MATERIALS TO BE 'EXPUNGED FROM THE RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS".
THEREFORE, THE SECRET VIDEO TAPE RECORDINGS OF ANAS AMEREYAW CLEARLY FALLS UNDER THE EXCLUSIONARY EVIDENCE RULE AND TO BE RENDERED A NULLITY, THERETO.
THAT TAKING ALSO COGNIZANCE OF THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS AS FOLLOWS:
UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 12.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
IT IS THEREFORE FOR THE SAKE OF JUSTICE AND PROTECTIONS OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND THE INTERNATIONAL LAW THAT I AM RESPECTFULLY CITING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE BELOW AS "A PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY" AND ALSO TO HELP GHANA JUDICIAL COUNCIL AND GOVERNMENT OF GHANA TO HELP REFORM GHANA JUDICIAL SYSTEM TO REALLY FIT INTO THE GLOBAL LEGAL AND JUDICIAL SYSTEMS OF THE 21ST CENTURY WORLD TO HELP DEVELOP GHANA JURISPRUDENCE AS A WAY FORWARD, THERETO.
PLEASE, REFER TO THE CASE BELOW:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOURTH (4TH) AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RIGHTS AND CASE LAW AS AN "ORBITA DICTA" OR PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY:
United States Supreme Court
MAPP v. OHIO, (1961)
No. 236
Argued: March 29, 1961 Decided: June 19, 1961
All evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Federal Constitution is inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court. Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 , overruled insofar as it holds to the contrary. Pp. 643-660.
170 Ohio St. 427, 166 N. E. 2d 387, reversed.
A. L. Kearns argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Walter L. Greene.
Gertrude Bauer Mahon argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief was John T. Corrigan.
Bernard A. Berkman argued the cause for the American Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief was Rowland Watts.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant stands convicted of knowingly having had in her possession and under her control certain lewd and lascivious books, pictures, and photographs in violation of 2905.34 of Ohio's Revised Code. 1 As officially stated in the syllabus to its opinion, the Supreme Court of Ohio found that her conviction was valid though "based primarily upon the introduction in evidence of lewd and lascivious books and pictures unlawfully seized during an unlawful search of defendant's home . . . ." 170 Ohio St. 427-428, 166 N. E. 2d 387, 388. [367 U.S. 643, 644]
On May 23, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at appellant's residence in that city pursuant to information that "a person [was] hiding out in the home, who was wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing, and that there was a large amount of policy paraphernalia being hidden in the home." Miss Mapp and her daughter by a former marriage lived on the top floor of the two-family dwelling. Upon their arrival at that house, the officers knocked on the door and demanded entrance but appellant, after telephoning her attorney, refused to admit them without a search warrant. They advised their headquarters of the situation and undertook a surveillance of the house.
The officers again sought entrance some three hours later when four or more additional officers arrived on the scene. When Miss Mapp did not come to the door immediately, at least one of the several doors to the house was forcibly opened 2 and the policemen gained admittance. Meanwhile Miss Mapp's attorney arrived, but the officers, having secured their own entry, and continuing in their defiance of the law, would permit him neither to see Miss Mapp nor to enter the house. It appears that Miss Mapp was halfway down the stairs from the upper floor to the front door when the officers, in this highhanded manner, broke into the hall. She demanded to see the search warrant. A paper, claimed to be a warrant, was held up by one of the officers. She grabbed the "warrant" and placed it in her bosom. A struggle ensued in which the officers recovered the piece of paper and as a result of which they handcuffed appellant because she had been "belligerent" [367 U.S. 643, 645] in resisting their official rescue of the "warrant" from her person. Running roughshod over appellant, a policeman "grabbed" her, "twisted [her] hand," and she "yelled [and] pleaded with him" because "it was hurting." Appellant, in handcuffs, was then forcibly taken upstairs to her bedroom where the officers searched a dresser, a chest of drawers, a closet and some suitcases. They also looked into a photo album and through personal papers belonging to the appellant. The search spread to the rest of the second floor including the child's bedroom, the living room, the kitchen and a dinette. The basement of the building and a trunk found therein were also searched. The obscene materials for possession of which she was ultimately convicted were discovered in the course of that widespread search.
At the trial no search warrant was produced by the prosecution, nor was the failure to produce one explained or accounted for. At best, "There is, in the record, considerable doubt as to whether there ever was any warrant for the search of defendant's home." 170 Ohio St., at 430, 166 N. E. 2d, at 389. The Ohio Supreme Court believed a "reasonable argument" could be made that the conviction should be reversed "because the `methods' employed to obtain the [evidence] . . . were such as to `offend "a sense of justice,"'" but the court found determinative the fact that the evidence had not been taken "from defendant's person by the use of brutal or offensive physical force against defendant." 170 Ohio St., at 431, 166 N. E. 2d, at 389-390.
The State says that even if the search were made without authority, or otherwise unreasonably, it is not prevented from using the unconstitutionally seized evidence at trial, citing Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949), in which this Court did indeed hold "that in a prosecution in a State court for a State crime the Fourteenth Amendment [367 U.S. 643, 646] does not forbid the admission of evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure." At p. 33. On this appeal, of which we have noted probable jurisdiction, 364 U.S. 868 , it is urged once again that we review that holding. 3
I.
Seventy-five years ago, in Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 630 (1886), considering the Fourth 4 and Fifth Amendments as running "almost into each other" 5 on the facts before it, this Court held that the doctrines of those Amendments
"apply to all invasions on the part of the government and its employes of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life. It is not the breaking of his doors, and the rummaging of his drawers, [367 U.S. 643, 647] that constitutes the essence of the offence; but it is the invasion of his indefeasible right of personal security, personal liberty and private property . . . . Breaking into a house and opening boxes and drawers are circumstances of aggravation; but any forcible and compulsory extortion of a man's own testimony or of his private papers to be used as evidence to convict him of crime or to forfeit his goods, is within the condemnation . . . [of those Amendments]."
The Court noted that
"constitutional provisions for the security of person and property should be liberally construed. . . . It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon." At p. 635.
In this jealous regard for maintaining the integrity of individual rights, the Court gave life to Madison's prediction that "independent tribunals of justice . . . will be naturally led to resist every encroachment upon rights expressly stipulated for in the Constitution by the declaration of rights." I Annals of Cong. 439 (1789). Concluding, the Court specifically referred to the use of the evidence there seized as "unconstitutional." At p. 638.
Less than 30 years after Boyd, this Court, in Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), stated that
"the Fourth Amendment . . . put the courts of the United States and Federal officials, in the exercise of their power and authority, under limitations and restraints [and] . . . forever secure[d] the people, their persons, houses, papers and effects against all unreasonable searches and seizures under the guise of law . . . and the duty of giving to it force and effect is obligatory upon all entrusted under our Federal system with the enforcement of the laws." At pp. 391-392. [367 U.S. 643, 648]
Specifically dealing with the use of the evidence unconstitutionally seized, the Court concluded:
"If letters and private documents can thus be seized and held and used in evidence against a citizen accused of an offense, the protection of the Fourth Amendment declaring his right to be secure against such searches and seizures is of no value, and, so far as those thus placed are concerned, might as well be stricken from the Constitution. The efforts of the courts and their officials to bring the guilty to punishment, praiseworthy as they are, are not to be aided by the sacrifice of those great principles established by years of endeavor and suffering which have resulted in their embodiment in the fundamental law of the land." At p. 393.
Finally, the Court in that case clearly stated that use of the seized evidence involved "a denial of the constitutional rights of the accused." At p. 398. Thus, in the year 1914, in the Weeks case, this Court "for the first time" held that "in a federal prosecution the Fourth Amendment barred the use of evidence secured through an illegal search and seizure." Wolf v. Colorado, supra, at 28. This Court has ever since required of federal law officers a strict adherence to that command which this Court has held to be a clear, specific, and constitutionally required - even if judicially implied - deterrent safeguard without insistence upon which the Fourth Amendment would have been reduced to "a form of words." Holmes, J., Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385, 392 (1920). It meant, quite simply, that "conviction by means of unlawful seizures and enforced confessions . . . should find no sanction in the judgments of the courts . . .," Weeks v. United States, supra, at 392, and that such evidence "shall not be used at all." Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, supra, at 392. [367 U.S. 643, 649]
There are in the cases of this Court some passing references to the Weeks rule as being one of evidence. But the plain and unequivocal language of Weeks - and its later paraphrase in Wolf - to the effect that the Weeks rule is of constitutional origin, remains entirely undisturbed. In Byars v. United States, 273 U.S. 28 (1927), a unanimous Court declared that "the doctrine [cannot] . . . be tolerated under our constitutional system, that evidences of crime discovered by a federal officer in making a search without lawful warrant may be used against the victim of the unlawful search where a timely challenge has been interposed." At pp. 29-30 (emphasis added). The Court, in Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), in unmistakable language restated the Weeks rule:
"The striking outcome of the Weeks case and those which followed it was the sweeping declaration that the Fourth Amendment, although not referring to or limiting the use of evidence in courts, really forbade its introduction if obtained by government officers through a violation of the Amendment." At p. 462.
In McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943), we note this statement:
"[A] conviction in the federal courts, the foundation of which is evidence obtained in disregard of liberties deemed fundamental by the Constitution, cannot stand. Boyd v. United States . . . Weeks v. United States . . . And this Court has, on Constitutional grounds, set aside convictions, both in the federal and state courts, which were based upon confessions `secured by protracted and repeated questioning of ignorant and untutored persons, in whose minds the power of officers was greatly magnified' [367 U.S. 643, 650] . . . or `who have been unlawfully held incommunicado without advice of friends or counsel' . . . ." At pp. 339-340.
Significantly in McNabb, the Court did then pass on to formulate a rule of evidence, saying, "[i]n the view we take of the case, however, it becomes unnecessary to reach the Constitutional issue [for] . . . [t]he principles governing the admissibility of evidence in federal criminal trials have not been restricted . . . to those derived solely from the Constitution." At pp. 340-341.
II.
In 1949, 35 years after Weeks was announced, this Court, in Wolf v. Colorado, supra, again for the first time, 6 discussed the effect of the Fourth Amendment upon the States through the operation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It said:
"[W]e have no hesitation in saying that were a State affirmatively to sanction such police incursion into privacy it would run counter to the guaranty of the Fourteenth Amendment." At p. 28.
Nevertheless, after declaring that the "security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion by the police" is "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty' and as such enforceable against the States through the Due Process Clause," cf. Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937), and announcing that it "stoutly adhere[d]" to the Weeks decision, the Court decided that the Weeks exclusionary rule would not then be imposed upon the States as "an essential ingredient of the right." 338 U.S., at 27 -29. The Court's reasons for not considering essential to the [367 U.S. 643, 651] right to privacy, as a curb imposed upon the States by the Due Process Clause, that which decades before had been posited as part and parcel of the Fourth Amendment's limitation upon federal encroachment of individual privacy, were bottomed on factual considerations.
While they are not basically relevant to a decision that the exclusionary rule is an essential ingredient of the Fourth Amendment as the right it embodies is vouchsafed against the States by the Due Process Clause, we will consider the current validity of the factual grounds upon which Wolf was based.
The Court in Wolf first stated that "[t]he contrariety of views of the States" on the adoption of the exclusionary rule of Weeks was "particularly impressive" (at p. 29); and, in this connection, that it could not "brush aside the experience of States which deem the incidence of such conduct by the police too slight to call for a deterrent remedy . . . by overriding the [States'] relevant rules of evidence." At pp. 31-32. While in 1949, prior to the Wolf case, almost two-thirds of the States were opposed to the use of the exclusionary rule, now, despite the Wolf case, more than half of those since passing upon it, by their own legislative or judicial decision, have wholly or partly adopted or adhered to the Weeks rule. See Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 , Appendix, pp. 224-232 (1960). Significantly, among those now following the rule is California, which, according to its highest court, was "compelled to reach that conclusion because other remedies have completely failed to secure compliance with the constitutional provisions . . . ." People v. Cahan, 44 Cal. 2d 434, 445, 282 P.2d 905, 911 (1955). In connection with this California case, we note that the second basis elaborated in Wolf in support of its failure to enforce the exclusionary doctrine against the States was that "other means of protection" have been afforded "the [367 U.S. 643, 652] right to privacy." 7 338 U.S., at 30 . The experience of California that such other remedies have been worthless and futile is buttressed by the experience of other States. The obvious futility of relegating the Fourth Amendment to the protection of other remedies has, moreover, been [367 U.S. 643, 653] recognized by this Court since Wolf. See Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 137 (1954).
Likewise, time has set its face against what Wolf called the "weighty testimony" of People v. Defore, 242 N. Y. 13, 150 N. E. 585 (1926). There Justice (then Judge) Cardozo, rejecting adoption of the Weeks exclusionary rule in New York, had said that "[t]he Federal rule as it stands is either too strict or too lax." 242 N. Y., at 22, 150 N. E., at 588. However, the force of that reasoning has been largely vitiated by later decisions of this Court. These include the recent discarding of the "silver platter" doctrine which allowed federal judicial use of evidence seized in violation of the Constitution by state agents, Elkins v. United States, supra; the relaxation of the formerly strict requirements as to standing to challenge the use of evidence thus seized, so that now the procedure of exclusion, "ultimately referable to constitutional safeguards," is available to anyone even "legitimately on [the] premises" unlawfully searched, Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 266 -267 (1960); and, finally, the formulation of a method to prevent state use of evidence unconstitutionally seized by federal agents, Rea v. United States, 350 U.S. 214 (1956). Because there can be no fixed formula, we are admittedly met with "recurring questions of the reasonableness of searches," but less is not to be expected when dealing with a Constitution, and, at any rate, "[r]easonableness is in the first instance for the [trial court] . . . to determine." United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 63 (1950).
It, therefore, plainly appears that the factual considerations supporting the failure of the Wolf Court to include the Weeks exclusionary rule when it recognized the enforceability of the right to privacy against the States in 1949, while not basically relevant to the constitutional consideration, could not, in any analysis, now be deemed controlling. [367 U.S. 643, 654]
III.
Some five years after Wolf, in answer to a plea made here Term after Term that we overturn its doctrine on applicability of the Weeks exclusionary rule, this Court indicated that such should not be done until the States had "adequate opportunity to adopt or reject the [Weeks] rule." Irvine v. California, supra, at 134. There again it was said:
"Never until June of 1949 did this Court hold the basic search-and-seizure prohibition in any way applicable to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment." Ibid.
And only last Term, after again carefully re-examining the Wolf doctrine in Elkins v. United States, supra, the Court pointed out that "the controlling principles" as to search and seizure and the problem of admissibility "seemed clear" (at p. 212) until the announcement in Wolf "that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not itself require state courts to adopt the exclusionary rule" of the Weeks case. At p. 213. At the same time, the Court pointed out, "the underlying constitutional doctrine which Wolf established . . . that the Federal Constitution . . . prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures by state officers" had undermined the "foundation upon which the admissibility of state-seized evidence in a federal trial originally rested . . . ." Ibid. The Court concluded that it was therefore obliged to hold, although it chose the narrower ground on which to do so, that all evidence obtained by an unconstitutional search and seizure was inadmissible in a federal court regardless of its source. Today we once again examine Wolf's constitutional documentation of the right to privacy free from unreasonable state intrusion, and, after its dozen years on our books, are led by it to close the only [367 U.S. 643, 655] courtroom door remaining open to evidence secured by official lawlessness in flagrant abuse of that basic right, reserved to all persons as a specific guarantee against that very same unlawful conduct. We hold that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is, by that same authority, inadmissible in a state court.
IV.
Since the Fourth Amendment's right of privacy has been declared enforceable against the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth, it is enforceable against them by the same sanction of exclusion as is used against the Federal Government. Were it otherwise, then just as without the Weeks rule the assurance against unreasonable federal searches and seizures would be "a form of words," valueless and undeserving of mention in a perpetual charter of inestimable human liberties, so too, without that rule the freedom from state invasions of privacy would be so ephemeral and so neatly severed from its conceptual nexus with the freedom from all brutish means of coercing evidence as not to merit this Court's high regard as a freedom "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty." At the time that the Court held in Wolf that the Amendment was applicable to the States through the Due Process Clause, the cases of this Court, as we have seen, had steadfastly held that as to federal officers the Fourth Amendment included the exclusion of the evidence seized in violation of its provisions. Even Wolf "stoutly adhered" to that proposition. The right to privacy, when conceded operatively enforceable against the States, was not susceptible of destruction by avulsion of the sanction upon which its protection and enjoyment had always been deemed dependent under the Boyd, Weeks and Silverthorne cases. Therefore, in extending the substantive protections of due process to all constitutionally unreasonable searches - state or federal - it was [367 U.S. 643, 656] logically and constitutionally necessary that the exclusion doctrine - an essential part of the right to privacy - be also insisted upon as an essential ingredient of the right newly recognized by the Wolf case. In short, the admission of the new constitutional right by Wolf could not consistently tolerate denial of its most important constitutional privilege, namely, the exclusion of the evidence which an accused had been forced to give by reason of the unlawful seizure. To hold otherwise is to grant the right but in reality to withhold its privilege and enjoyment. Only last year the Court itself recognized that the purpose of the exclusionary rule "is to deter - to compel respect for the constitutional guaranty in the only effectively available way - by removing the incentive to disregard it." Elkins v. United States, supra, at 217.
Indeed, we are aware of no restraint, similar to that rejected today, conditioning the enforcement of any other basic constitutional right. The right to privacy, no less important than any other right carefully and particularly reserved to the people, would stand in marked contrast to all other rights declared as "basic to a free society." Wolf v. Colorado, supra, at
THAT IT IS IN THE LIGHT OF ABOVE THAT THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOM OF THE PERSON AND PEOPLE TO BE RESPECTED, PROTECTED AND TO BE DEFENDED IN A FREE DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY.
THAT IT IS THE MOTTO AND PRINCIPLE OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION THAT "DEFENDING LIBERTY WHILE PURSUING JUSTICE"
IT IS THEREFORE MY RESPECTFUL SUBMISSION AND CANDID OPINION THAT SINCE ANAS EXPOSE FAILED, NEGLECTED AND REFUSED TO RESPECT AND OBEY ARTICLE 18 (2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION, THE EVIDENCE ACT AND THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY OBTAINING A VALID COURT ORDER BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION OR THE EXPOSE WAS ALSO NOT DONE IN AN OPEN AND TRANSPARENT MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW THAT THE ANAS VIDEO EXPOSE IS DEEM ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED AS A LAWFUL EVIDENTIAL MATERIAL.
THAT IN VIEW ALSO OF THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE 'WHETHER OR NOT ANY LEGALITY CAN RESULT OUT OF ILLEGAL ACTS OF BOTH PARTIES OR PERSONS AS IN THE CASE OF ANAS AMEREYAW ANAS EXPOSE?"
THAT IT HAS BECOME VERY NECESSARY AND ALSO VERY DICEY IF THE ASSERTION AND CLAIM MADE BY "SIR JOHN" FORMER GENERAL SECRETARY OF NPP THAT "THEY HAVE SOME INVINCIBLE FORCES WORKING FOR THEM AND THEIR RESULT WOULD SOON BE KNOWN?"
THAT ASSUMING AND GRANTING THAT WE ARE LIVING IN THE PHYSICAL AND VISIBLE WORLD AND THERE WAS A CLAIM THAT THERE ARE "SOME INVISIBLE FORCES ALSO WORKING UNKNOWN TO THOSE OF US LIVING REASONABLE IN THE VISIBLE , OPEN AND TRANSPARENT WORLD AND THE LEGAL ISSUE THEREFORE "WHO IS ANAS AND WHAT IS/WAS HIS "MODUS OPERANDI" OF THE ANAS EXPOSE?
IT IS THEREFORE MY HUMBLE AND CANDID SUBMISSION THAT THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL COMMITTEE TO SERIOUSLY WEIGH, ANALYZE AND EVALUATE ALL THESE RELATED LEGAL ISSUES/MATTERS VERY CAREFULLY TO DISMISS THE CASE MADE AGAINST THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND THE JUDICIAL STAFF IMPLICATED BY ANAS SECRET VIDEO TO HELP PROTECT PRIVACY OF HOME, PROPERTY, COMMUNICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE AS PROVIDED UNDER ARTICLE 18(2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND UNITED NATIONS CHARTER ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOM.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
GOD BLESS GHANA , AMERICA. UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED NATIONS.
VERY TRULY YOURS,
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, ESQ.
INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT
Sam 8 years ago
Wow! musings of a severely deranged person.Have you stopped taking your medications?
Wow! musings of a severely deranged person.Have you stopped taking your medications?
Nicholas Murphy 8 years ago
These guys dey mock oooo yea yea
These guys dey mock oooo yea yea
Akorabs 8 years ago
Please shut up. We know what happens in your chosen profession. Today it is the judiciary, tomorrow it could be you lot. There is a film on the way in any case. Do not worry.
Please shut up. We know what happens in your chosen profession. Today it is the judiciary, tomorrow it could be you lot. There is a film on the way in any case. Do not worry.
Jeff 8 years ago
You dare shut my Bishop up??? That your hand that you used to type shall not type again and that your mouth shall not speak again then you will know that you cannot touch God's anointed and go free. You'll loose the work you ... read full comment
You dare shut my Bishop up??? That your hand that you used to type shall not type again and that your mouth shall not speak again then you will know that you cannot touch God's anointed and go free. You'll loose the work you do and you will never get some. You will suffer all your life. If i be a man of God may it be according my word in Jesus name.
Prophet 8 years ago
Your bishop and so what?Let us all wait for the judgement day.Jesus said on that day people will say i did this and that in your name but he will tell them i do not know you.
Your bishop and so what?Let us all wait for the judgement day.Jesus said on that day people will say i did this and that in your name but he will tell them i do not know you.
Charlie London 8 years ago
Oh poor Jeff!! So we still have some of you still living in this world? I mean you these highest grade one fools!!! Even Jesus was accused,insulted, spat at, slapped, beaten up. But he doesn't needs you to fight those who ca ... read full comment
Oh poor Jeff!! So we still have some of you still living in this world? I mean you these highest grade one fools!!! Even Jesus was accused,insulted, spat at, slapped, beaten up. But he doesn't needs you to fight those who caused him those pains. So who cares about your mortal corrupt pastor.
JK 8 years ago
please ; all those speaking the pleasures of this world should come to LCI for wisdom
please ; all those speaking the pleasures of this world should come to LCI for wisdom
Adom 8 years ago
This Bishop do not make any sense all! The Judge in question is your family member. So just shot the fuck up! Cus you're not a saint you're just as corrupt too, you claim you got a calling by GOD to preach when in fact you ... read full comment
This Bishop do not make any sense all! The Judge in question is your family member. So just shot the fuck up! Cus you're not a saint you're just as corrupt too, you claim you got a calling by GOD to preach when in fact you just want to make money on a fast track. A Doctor should be saving lives at the hospital not collecting money at the church.
Jeff 8 years ago
Just wait for the evil that is about to befall you. Your children will hate and Mock you you will suffer before you eat
Just wait for the evil that is about to befall you. Your children will hate and Mock you you will suffer before you eat
Ghanaian 7 years ago
And you should find something better to do with your life,atleast he leads people to Christ andyou what do you do with even your own brutish life
And you should find something better to do with your life,atleast he leads people to Christ andyou what do you do with even your own brutish life
Kwadjo Despite 8 years ago
Anas we need you at Ghana Football Association (GFA) for better investigation.
Anas we need you at Ghana Football Association (GFA) for better investigation.
Sankofa 8 years ago
Is Justice Ivy Heward-Mills related to Bishop Dag Heward-Mills (who will not allow his wife to be a judge)?
Is Justice Ivy Heward-Mills related to Bishop Dag Heward-Mills (who will not allow his wife to be a judge)?
k. duku 8 years ago
Rearrest justice Atuguba and his friend Asantehene. They are the cause of allthe pains our nation is going through.Others are following their foot steps.Asantehene must blame himself first.
Rearrest justice Atuguba and his friend Asantehene. They are the cause of allthe pains our nation is going through.Others are following their foot steps.Asantehene must blame himself first.
Carol 8 years ago
What illiterate talk. His wife could have been a judge who didn't take the bribe like some of the others. No one is talking about the ones who were exonerated. They must be commended.
What illiterate talk. His wife could have been a judge who didn't take the bribe like some of the others. No one is talking about the ones who were exonerated. They must be commended.
kwei 8 years ago
Shut the fuckup.
Who's your wife.
Shut the fuckup.
Who's your wife.
kwei 8 years ago
Shut the fuckup.
Who's your wife.
Shut the fuckup.
Who's your wife.
burrey 8 years ago
touch not my anointed and cause my prophet no harm .......God forgive them for they dont know what they are saying
touch not my anointed and cause my prophet no harm .......God forgive them for they dont know what they are saying
Mama Tebuah 8 years ago
Yes no body is above the laws of God.what did this m
Yes no body is above the laws of God.what did this m
Mama Tebuah 8 years ago
What is wrong with what he said.if he says the wife isn't a jugde is it wrong.where from this insults from the bible says woe unto the one who offends the spirit,that one will never be forgiven.we can be forgiven all sins but ... read full comment
What is wrong with what he said.if he says the wife isn't a jugde is it wrong.where from this insults from the bible says woe unto the one who offends the spirit,that one will never be forgiven.we can be forgiven all sins but not this.bible says touch not my anointed do my prophet no harm yes .anointing is a spirit from God.its Gods spirit and not law school certificate right.fear the man who is anointed yea you speak against them and you bring curses upon your generation.you speak against God yea.how there you compare men of God with this judges.stop insulting men of God ooo.cos you speak against the anointing of God and he won't forgive by the scripture.you think God is a man he knew you talk about pastors that's why the were into professions before he called them.not every pastor is corrupt.pastor mills was a medical Doctor what can't he get with his profesions.a pastors wife is suppose to help the husband.God can call some one without a profession or with a profession.read how he called his deciples if we even listen to dead goats who are not called by God,but called themselves and allow them to rule us ahh how much more men of God.do we get spiritual food from dead goats no no.please stop bringing curses upon your selves and generations OK.its dangerous
Realms 8 years ago
God bless you for stirring up wisdom dear. U will flourish.
God bless you for stirring up wisdom dear. U will flourish.
kojo 8 years ago
@ Maggie , if u don't agree with the man of God, just say it but Calling him maggot is serious. pls watch ur words. thank u
@ Maggie , if u don't agree with the man of God, just say it but Calling him maggot is serious. pls watch ur words. thank u
kojo 8 years ago
@ Realms , if u don't agree with the man of God, just say it but Calling him maggot is serious. pls watch ur words. thank u
@ Realms , if u don't agree with the man of God, just say it but Calling him maggot is serious. pls watch ur words. thank u
Daniel k Donald 8 years ago
God forgive u all dose who ar talkin against man of God.
God forgive u all dose who ar talkin against man of God.
Agyeman 8 years ago
Your wife would not be a judge but rather a disguised politician?
Your wife would not be a judge but rather a disguised politician?
andy 8 years ago
Shame to u all who are insulting the man of God.you are calling curses upon yo life and children.
Shame to u all who are insulting the man of God.you are calling curses upon yo life and children.
andy 8 years ago
Shame to all of you who are insulting the man of God.you really don't know what is coming upon your lives and children.you wl be cursed a million times.
Shame to all of you who are insulting the man of God.you really don't know what is coming upon your lives and children.you wl be cursed a million times.
Samuel Commey 8 years ago
It can't be the bishops wife
It can't be the bishops wife
Maurice Kidambi- Kenya 8 years ago
you have been an inspirational preacher to me and let me assure you we are praying together
you have been an inspirational preacher to me and let me assure you we are praying together
They are all as corrupt as mpepefuo govt of Mahama.
Who would have thought this? The next big titles Ghanaians would be running away from would be that of a BISHOP and OVERSEER.
Ghana shall be cleaned of criminal big title holders.
ARREST JUSTICE ATUGUBA.
Of course there is more money in the Church business than Judiciary, If the Church were to be a public entity and were to be investigated,all the Pastors will be in jail.Fact is,our society is rotten and we need a moral overh ...
read full comment
JUDGES TAKE BRIBES ONCE IN A BLUE MOON. PASTORS ROBB MURDER EVERYDAY.
TWIAAAAAAAA FUO !!
First, is it for him to 'allow' his wife...? Does he own her? Is she not an adult above 18?
Two, when the searchlight is turned on pastors and I hope soon, he would have wished he remained a medical doctor. Medical personnel ...
read full comment
THAT JUDGE MILES, ALLOWED A FRIEND TO LOCK MY BROTHER UP IN HIS HOUSE FOR 2 DAYS BECAUSE HE KNEW HER. THEN SHE QUICKLY BROUGHT THE CASE TO COURT AND PASSED SENTENCE AS SHE WISHED TO SHOW THAT SHE HAD POWER. WITH THE EXPOSE' W ...
read full comment
Your wife will not even qualify to be a judge so dont boast of not allowing her.
Are you the one who decide for her what she should do or not to do?
My bishop has not , and will never insult anyone. For those who think they have the right to insult him, must be on their feet and stand well, for their curses has already been manifested. Both their generations and generatio ...
read full comment
All those speaking against true servants of God, you have shown your foolishness and destructive pride. Just pray God does not judge you for this. May God have mercy upon all of you. COCKROACHES
And you are also religious? name-calling is un-christian. At least I'm smart enough not to be brainwashed with your stupid religious idealogies. Don't make God part of it. Pastors are worse than the justices, truth be told - ...
read full comment
If u don't fear God, then you will die b4 your time. Cockroach
Realms, what a stupid, idiotic and primitive talk is that? Someone will die like a cockroach because they have challenged your pastor and your God? I pity you.do you know why? Because I think you are a motherfucker idiot who ...
read full comment
yes that is true
Dont talk arrogantly God will purnish you
Why will your wife be a judge even if she qualifies. The amount of money you lot are getting in this church business is ridiculous. Speaking tongues and your so called miracles. Please shut up and continue to enjoy your boot ...
read full comment
ANYWAY, WE ARE ALSO WAITING FOR THAT MOVIE BY UK CHRISTIANS WRITTEN AND DIRECTED BY SAMMY ANKRAH (WHO THEY SAY IS AN NPP EXECUTIVE!) AIMED AT EXPOSING FAKE AND CORRUPT PASTORS. HOW I WISHED NAMES OF FAKE PASTORS WOULD BE MENT ...
read full comment
Georgina Woode must resign.
Our Mama, FirstLady of LCI works for God.
Don't associate her with that cesspool of corruption. Please.
BCOSE THOSE SO-CALLED PASTORS STEAL BIGGER MONIES FROM PEOPLE IN THE FORM OF SO-CALLED TITHES AND "OFFERINGSS" AND THEY OFTEN GET AWAY WITH IT, UNLIKE JUDGES. PASTORS INDEED!
All those speaking against true servants of God u have shown your foolishness and destructive pride. Just pray that God does not judge you for this evil u have done. May God have mercy upon all of you. COCKROACHES.
Please tell us who the true servants of God are???? Brainwashed fool!!!!You rather are showing your ignorant,foolishness and destructive pride.You cannot and do not decide who God Judges and so Bishop also???
You backward thinker, when was the last time you made decision for GOD. You piece of shit, one man church deceiving poor people for your own gain. Maggot like you, God will hammer you.
U know what knYc, I won't bother speaking wisdom unto u cos u are toooo... shallow in spiritual things. I just wanted to make all those COCKROACHES know that they were wrong but it seems some people want to justify their stu ...
read full comment
Hahaha U know what KnYc (nat) , I won't bother speaking wisdom unto u cos I can see u are toooo shallow in spiritual things. Teiko u can insult me more just Bcoc I wanted those COCKROACHES to know that they were wrong. Oooooo ...
read full comment
U call yourself a servant of God ,pleading with God to forgive them of their sins.U end up calling them cockroaches. Who r u? U r an ass kisser who shower praises on these corrupt pastors. U should rather repent n a get a job ...
read full comment
May God forgive you for saying that to pastors
Your wife needs permission to do what she wants? And there's no corruption in the very many churches in Ghana? Anas hopefully will get to you all next...
It is you that God will deal with 4 disrespecting a true servants Of God. Hw dare the demon in u
Hmmmm look at this man. So who is Ivy and how is she related to you???
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
A RHETORICAL QUESTION AND A RHETORICAL ANSWER.most of us know the answer and the better particulars.
U are a cockroach for asking such a stupid and needless question
To say you wouldn't have allowed your wife to be a judge if she so wishes is unfair and backward. We need to empower women to aspire for higher laurels. May be the reporter misquoted you.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
What's do you mean by affirmative action?
Most you repeat things like ako.
Affirmative action is used in the US to address years of discrimination and slavery in that nation against blacks.
An uneducated fool. He thought his wife is private property. What if his wife want to be a judge?
I cant believe you call yourself great mind.you call this wisdom of yours great.this is the wisdom of the world and God calls it foolishness so what have i got to say about it.
U dare insult a true servants of God in that manner? U have xposed the dirty demon in u. If your unseen enemies succeed in destroying u it is your fault. A cockroach who has no respect 4 servants of God. Mercy on your head
IF you insult a man of God,you may think you are running with freedom of expression and civilization but God will forgive you anyway but be careful.
For your information,Bishop Dag-Heward Mills is a trained medical doctor.
...
read full comment
what is wrong with u god will deal with u in spirit u will reg
ret for insulting him
I am thinking she she should rather be a judge and be a good example of one. Bible says "let your light shine before men that they may see your good works and give glory to God"
Go for the bench if you can make a difference! ...
read full comment
To paraphrase, I will never let my wife be a judge, even if she wanted to: It is nice to know your wife's opinion does not matter, Bishop.
If the pastor is speaking biblical as head of the house and therefore assuming he knows what is best for his wife then I get it ...But in reality that notion is bullocks in today's world where woman are earning their own mone ...
read full comment
Hi Sunshine, Thanks. It is not only that many women are earning their own money but many are actually the Bread Winners and they work harder than many men! Again, they are often more intelligent than the men so these 'Biblica ...
read full comment
This so called bishop talks too much and unnecessary all the time especially when he tries to get himself heard.
master seek for wisdom n dnt talk anyhow.
This so called bishop talks too much and unnecessary all the time especially when he tries to get himself heard.
u arr a big FOOOOOOOL!!! Kwasea!! ogyimifuo!
may GOD hv mercy on u
if it not dat his mercy endureth forever u would hv been dead by now and u will even miss hell .onyeeeee gbemi !!
so you go to LCI to learn "onyee gbemi" things???
Very sad of your comments too, insulting someone because you dont agree with their comments doesnt make you any different from them perhaps you need the living word of God that can transform your hearts instead of the everyda ...
read full comment
U are not being a good example
Bishop Dag is right.Shame unto Ghana's judiciary.It's even support the fact that the court case on election rigging between Nana Akuffo Addo and president Manama was not based on fair judgment.
.
Are we still living in the dark ages for you to determine your wife's occupation? Your comment is sexist and wrong if this is how think. Please set good examples consistently not selectively.
Please visit our website www.lighthousechapel.org and find a church near you. God Blessisngs
We Love Our Church and We Love Our Bishop Dag, His Wife, All the other Bishops and everyone.
lol, our bishop and his wife? ??What happened to our God? He is the only one to be revered. Stop worshipping humans! Even Jesus, who was God's only begotten son wasn't worshipped and didn't take on ridiculous titles.
I wonder why the writer of this article never thought it wise to write an article on the message Bishop Dag preached about.No i know why, just to please man.
Here you are working to please man and you are here saying nonsens ...
read full comment
young man u really lack respect. u jxt open ur mouth n talk anyhow bcos a man was talkn abt corruption n he wont allow his wife to join such office n u ar sayn wat .u are a serious foooooool.
you are a fooool.
Come to LCI come learn the wisdom of God not the wisdom of man and do well to read your Bible not those books coz they are actually corrupting your mind
Church De Sweet pahpah
Ok lucky, Ran Ran Anas is coming tomorrow it will be the preachers and pastors so called bring a white hankerchiefs turn .
We are Emmanuel borborbor group located at Abeka Lapas, contact Wisdom on 0209158777 for any information towards your outdooring, wedding, funeral or any party event for best performance.
Contact Wisdom on 0209158777
Thank ...
read full comment
Dag appears interesting indeed!!! Pastors of his type are worse culprits; we are all seeing what is happening in our churches. He should better shut up and enjoy his riches.
You wanna lose weight, ask me HOW? Am Richman, a certified Fitness Personal Trainer from "Reebok University". Call on me for your weight lost program, diet plan and all you need to know about wellness.
Tel: +233 268705547
WE ARE ALSO WAITING FOR THAT MOVIE BY UK CHRISTIANS WRITTEN AND DIRECTED BY SAMMY ANKRAH (WHO THEY SAY IS AN NPP EXECUTIVE!) AIMED AT EXPOSING FAKE AND CORRUPT PASTORS. HOW I WISHED NAMES OF FAKE PASTORS WOULD BE MENTIONED IN ...
read full comment
MAN OF GOD, YOU DONT NEED TO WORRY YOURSELF AND TALK MUCH. YOUR WIFE'S NAME IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE NAME MENTIONED WITH THE FIRST NAME.
...
read full comment
OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUSTICE, DEAR MADAM , THE 11 JUDDERS WHO HAVE PROVED TO THE WORLD THAT THEIR NOT CORRUPT, LOVE GHANA, GHANAIAN S, LOVE THEIR COUNTRY SHOULD BE ELEVATED, PROMOTED AND MADE HEROES FOR THE WHOLE WORLD T ...
read full comment
ARE THE BISHOPS ANY LESS CORRUPT? I DOUBT IT
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, BARRISTER-AT LAW, QCL, PLC, DPA, CPA, BA (HONS) {GHANA}, MASTER OF LAWS (LLM) {NEW YORK, USA} PENDING, MEMBER, INTERNATIONAL (WORLD/GLOBAL) BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSO ...
read full comment
Wow! musings of a severely deranged person.Have you stopped taking your medications?
These guys dey mock oooo yea yea
Please shut up. We know what happens in your chosen profession. Today it is the judiciary, tomorrow it could be you lot. There is a film on the way in any case. Do not worry.
You dare shut my Bishop up??? That your hand that you used to type shall not type again and that your mouth shall not speak again then you will know that you cannot touch God's anointed and go free. You'll loose the work you ...
read full comment
Your bishop and so what?Let us all wait for the judgement day.Jesus said on that day people will say i did this and that in your name but he will tell them i do not know you.
Oh poor Jeff!! So we still have some of you still living in this world? I mean you these highest grade one fools!!! Even Jesus was accused,insulted, spat at, slapped, beaten up. But he doesn't needs you to fight those who ca ...
read full comment
please ; all those speaking the pleasures of this world should come to LCI for wisdom
This Bishop do not make any sense all! The Judge in question is your family member. So just shot the fuck up! Cus you're not a saint you're just as corrupt too, you claim you got a calling by GOD to preach when in fact you ...
read full comment
Just wait for the evil that is about to befall you. Your children will hate and Mock you you will suffer before you eat
And you should find something better to do with your life,atleast he leads people to Christ andyou what do you do with even your own brutish life
Anas we need you at Ghana Football Association (GFA) for better investigation.
Is Justice Ivy Heward-Mills related to Bishop Dag Heward-Mills (who will not allow his wife to be a judge)?
Rearrest justice Atuguba and his friend Asantehene. They are the cause of allthe pains our nation is going through.Others are following their foot steps.Asantehene must blame himself first.
What illiterate talk. His wife could have been a judge who didn't take the bribe like some of the others. No one is talking about the ones who were exonerated. They must be commended.
Shut the fuckup.
Who's your wife.
Shut the fuckup.
Who's your wife.
touch not my anointed and cause my prophet no harm .......God forgive them for they dont know what they are saying
Yes no body is above the laws of God.what did this m
What is wrong with what he said.if he says the wife isn't a jugde is it wrong.where from this insults from the bible says woe unto the one who offends the spirit,that one will never be forgiven.we can be forgiven all sins but ...
read full comment
God bless you for stirring up wisdom dear. U will flourish.
@ Maggie , if u don't agree with the man of God, just say it but Calling him maggot is serious. pls watch ur words. thank u
@ Realms , if u don't agree with the man of God, just say it but Calling him maggot is serious. pls watch ur words. thank u
God forgive u all dose who ar talkin against man of God.
Your wife would not be a judge but rather a disguised politician?
Shame to u all who are insulting the man of God.you are calling curses upon yo life and children.
Shame to all of you who are insulting the man of God.you really don't know what is coming upon your lives and children.you wl be cursed a million times.
It can't be the bishops wife
you have been an inspirational preacher to me and let me assure you we are praying together