Judicial scandal: Indicted Justice Derry sues Anas

Read Article

Comments (174)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (174)

jorge 10 years ago

this is bulshit. we don't need to legally prove wrong doing

this is bulshit. we don't need to legally prove wrong doing
JIMMY 10 years ago

WE HEAR DERRY

WE HEAR DERRY
ARD 10 years ago

WHY NOT COME OUT TO APOLOGIESE RATHER??

WHY NOT COME OUT TO APOLOGIESE RATHER??
ATSU, HO 10 years ago

A MATTER BEFORE THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL CANNOT BE SENT TO COURT. THE COUCIL WILL HAVE TO FINISH THEDIR WORK FIRST BERFORE THIS TIME WASTING SUIT IS CONSIDERED. CORRUPT INDIVIDUALS!

A MATTER BEFORE THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL CANNOT BE SENT TO COURT. THE COUCIL WILL HAVE TO FINISH THEDIR WORK FIRST BERFORE THIS TIME WASTING SUIT IS CONSIDERED. CORRUPT INDIVIDUALS!
Baba 10 years ago

The judge doesn't know Anas has immunity from all these backlash?

The judge doesn't know Anas has immunity from all these backlash?
TIEMRER 10 years ago

NOW THAT IT HITS JUDGES WE ARE SEEING THE REAL FACE OF THEM

NOW THAT IT HITS JUDGES WE ARE SEEING THE REAL FACE OF THEM
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 10 years ago

Anas should call the bluff of this bribe taker and disgraced judge. He thinks intimidation will work. In any case, he cannot sue because Anas has been given immunity from prosecution under the Whistle Blowers Act by the Judic ...
read full comment

Anas should call the bluff of this bribe taker and disgraced judge. He thinks intimidation will work. In any case, he cannot sue because Anas has been given immunity from prosecution under the Whistle Blowers Act by the Judicial Council. If he knows the law, then he should go to court to set aside the immunity given to Anas first because without doing so the court will have no jurisdiction to hear his suit against Anas. He does not even know the law and that tells why he collected bribe to give wrongful judgement.
champion 10 years ago

this judge is a disgrace to mankind. what does he meant when he said 'obtained the video unlawfully'?

this judge is a disgrace to mankind. what does he meant when he said 'obtained the video unlawfully'?
kweku 10 years ago

Maybe he took selfie video of himself taking bribes and patented it so that Anas is trespassing for obtaining unauthorised copies......hahahahahaaa stupid judges like these jailing others.

Maybe he took selfie video of himself taking bribes and patented it so that Anas is trespassing for obtaining unauthorised copies......hahahahahaaa stupid judges like these jailing others.
OLD SOLDIER 10 years ago

ARREST CORRUPT JUSTICE ATUGUBA. THAT STUPID SUPREME COURT JUDGE.

ARREST CORRUPT JUSTICE ATUGUBA. THAT STUPID SUPREME COURT JUDGE.

K Boat 10 years ago

So this judge isn't challenging the contents of the video but rather the manner in which it was obtained. I thought the best thing for him to do is to apologise unreservedly for his actions rather than seeking refuge in some ...
read full comment

So this judge isn't challenging the contents of the video but rather the manner in which it was obtained. I thought the best thing for him to do is to apologise unreservedly for his actions rather than seeking refuge in some legal technicalities. He is only making matters worse for himself.
Omanhene (U$A) 10 years ago

Why is this IGNORANT, CORRUPT, SHAMELESS & downright STUPID judge suing Anas, the Chief Justice & the Judicial Council for? Doesn’t he know no shame, but has the audacity, nerves and courage to tread on this dangerous path? ...
read full comment

Why is this IGNORANT, CORRUPT, SHAMELESS & downright STUPID judge suing Anas, the Chief Justice & the Judicial Council for? Doesn’t he know no shame, but has the audacity, nerves and courage to tread on this dangerous path? As we phrase it here: “IT IS ON”—meaning, the fight has just started!!

SUING THEM FOR WHAT, NEGRO?? Did you take the damn bribe or didn't you stretch your dirty hand to accept the bribe money? Audio and/or videotaping your abominable act, without your knowledge, would survive in court. Did the judge expect Anas to ask him “…sir, can I record your stupid ass for accepting this bribe?”

The judge is going to make matters worse for himself and the rest of the implicated judges. WHY??

1) By making Anas angry for him to show all the videos and audio transcripts to the whole nation; and

2) That, the Chief Justice and the Judicial Council will also get RED HOT angry for suing them and wouldn't have the otherwise mercy, sympathy and leniency on this foolish judge and his companions in bribery & thievery.

So, Anas, be damn angry and show everything. No court will CONVICT you for doing your job or you (Anas) can BRIBE the judge, who would adjudicate your case in court, because that's what they do best. THIEVES!!
============================================================================
Sigma, London 10 years ago

Has Justice Dery forgotten that Anas has been given immunity by the Attorney General. I never knew Anas has enemies. Only criminals are his enemies.

Has Justice Dery forgotten that Anas has been given immunity by the Attorney General. I never knew Anas has enemies. Only criminals are his enemies.
MAD COBRA 10 years ago

Corruption has eaten into the entire fabric of the Ghanaian society I mean corruption in high and low places including churches and mosques which are always full of people. Politically and socialy Ghana is a failed nation wit ...
read full comment

Corruption has eaten into the entire fabric of the Ghanaian society I mean corruption in high and low places including churches and mosques which are always full of people. Politically and socialy Ghana is a failed nation with no goal.
BRO JOE 10 years ago

HE WHO COMES TO EQUITY MUST COME WITH CLEAN HANDS.FUNNY, FUNNY JUDGE

HE WHO COMES TO EQUITY MUST COME WITH CLEAN HANDS.FUNNY, FUNNY JUDGE
MR TRUTH 10 years ago

THIS JUDGE DOESN'T HAVE SHAME. HE WANTS TO USE SOME LEGAL SHANINGHANS TO STOP ANAS WHO IS HELPING ALL OF US. EVEN IF THIS JUDGE WINS USING THE LEGAL TECHNICALITIES HE IS TRYING TO USE, I WILL SEE HIM AS THIEF AND ROGUE IF THE ...
read full comment

THIS JUDGE DOESN'T HAVE SHAME. HE WANTS TO USE SOME LEGAL SHANINGHANS TO STOP ANAS WHO IS HELPING ALL OF US. EVEN IF THIS JUDGE WINS USING THE LEGAL TECHNICALITIES HE IS TRYING TO USE, I WILL SEE HIM AS THIEF AND ROGUE IF THE VIDEO SAYS SO. IF SOME ONE STEALS YOUR GOAT, AND GETS AWAY DUE TO SOME TECHNICALITIES, THAT DOESN'T MEAN HE IS NOT A THIEF IN YOUR EYES. THE ONLY CONSOLATION IS THAT THE WHOLE COUNTRY IS ROTTEN FROM HEAD TO TOE.
daladam 10 years ago

THE GOVT VIA THE ATTORNEY GENERAL GAVE ANAS IMMMUNITY FROM ANY LAW SUIT AGAINST HIM

THE GOVT VIA THE ATTORNEY GENERAL GAVE ANAS IMMMUNITY FROM ANY LAW SUIT AGAINST HIM
ARD 10 years ago

that is ghana for you

that is ghana for you
Zhang lee 10 years ago

you are not serious thieves you guys sit in court rooms and jail innocent souls now the whole world have seen you guys

you are not serious thieves you guys sit in court rooms and jail innocent souls now the whole world have seen you guys
Nana Kwaku 10 years ago

He who has never sin before shd cast the first stone,can Saint John Dramani Mahama cast the first stone?A crab can never give birth to a bird,our corrupt leaders are just a reflection of the society.

He who has never sin before shd cast the first stone,can Saint John Dramani Mahama cast the first stone?A crab can never give birth to a bird,our corrupt leaders are just a reflection of the society.

NO NONSENSE TAKER 10 years ago

Bring your understanding to the person whose responsibility has been for the nation to occupy the intense stress of corruption, lawlessness, crime, political instability and economic retrogression.To claim yourself the presid ...
read full comment

Bring your understanding to the person whose responsibility has been for the nation to occupy the intense stress of corruption, lawlessness, crime, political instability and economic retrogression.To claim yourself the president with intention of bloating voters register and bribing a supreme court judge is not only the beginning of where "pepeni born ayigbes" always come from but an intriguing new face of democracy where "pepeni born ayigbes" has gotten it all wrong. A man's conduct imperatively poject his actions so there is no way the incriminatory conduct of the foolish president can't reflect the direction the nation seems to be turning. The figures tell us the majority of the corrupt judges were "pepeni born ayigbes" and it explains the seemingly of the scrumbling and the occupation of judicial faculties, police departments, military, politics, financies etc. are without any reason under corruption. Now that all have seen the height of the pepeni's self adjudication and implications to the common system of our democracy, we need to define pepeni's prejudice with respect to the constitutional laws under same democracy which we find them many around. Kwame Nkoromah was smart but pepeni has not been calculative, there should be a reason to follow ones footsteps!
against unclean person 10 years ago

If nana is not corrupt tell us where he got his law certificate if he has any. Tell us his classmates, the yr he completed the school and stop worrying mahama the genuine man. Corruption is not only about taking money mr ...
read full comment

If nana is not corrupt tell us where he got his law certificate if he has any. Tell us his classmates, the yr he completed the school and stop worrying mahama the genuine man. Corruption is not only about taking money mr nonsense man
Raymond Agbeli 10 years ago

No NONSENCE TAKER,u're such a little brainer! Among all the corrupt judges how many of them are pepenis or ewes? Virtually non of them.they're all of the akan origine,this should tell u how corrupt u people can be! u tribalis ...
read full comment

No NONSENCE TAKER,u're such a little brainer! Among all the corrupt judges how many of them are pepenis or ewes? Virtually non of them.they're all of the akan origine,this should tell u how corrupt u people can be! u tribalistic idiot!!
Humanity 10 years ago

The NERVE of this judge is UNBELIEVABLE. They will not treat ordinary citizens like FOOLS for ever.
The POWERS that be, are taking it serious and will deal with such NONSENSE.
ONLY in AFRICA, you are caught on tape acceptin ...
read full comment

The NERVE of this judge is UNBELIEVABLE. They will not treat ordinary citizens like FOOLS for ever.
The POWERS that be, are taking it serious and will deal with such NONSENSE.
ONLY in AFRICA, you are caught on tape accepting bribes and you have the audacity to....Damn!
pilolo 10 years ago

This is ridiculous. This fool Derry takes bribe and expect the law to work for him? Stupid man. Another judge will take bribe and throw his case out, poco a poco all the thieves in Ghana will be reveaveld, prof Martey include ...
read full comment

This is ridiculous. This fool Derry takes bribe and expect the law to work for him? Stupid man. Another judge will take bribe and throw his case out, poco a poco all the thieves in Ghana will be reveaveld, prof Martey included
Constructivist 10 years ago

Anas, quickly go ahead and screen the video. These dirty criminals should be placed where they belonged.

Anas, quickly go ahead and screen the video. These dirty criminals should be placed where they belonged.
Prince Charles 10 years ago

(Justice?) Derry has lost his mind. Was he expecting the reporter to ask his permission before secretly recording him taking bribe? And these are the adjudicators of our judicial system; God save us all.

(Justice?) Derry has lost his mind. Was he expecting the reporter to ask his permission before secretly recording him taking bribe? And these are the adjudicators of our judicial system; God save us all.
Akos 10 years ago

Now they're acting like demi gods who thinks they're above the laws and don't deserve to be punish. They're using a bullying tactics & trying to make Anas look like the bad guy but Ghanaians ain't stupid. Regardless of this b ...
read full comment

Now they're acting like demi gods who thinks they're above the laws and don't deserve to be punish. They're using a bullying tactics & trying to make Anas look like the bad guy but Ghanaians ain't stupid. Regardless of this bogus lawsuit, the evidence against these corrupt judges is overwhelming and I hope the judicial system don't allow this tactic to crowd their judgment & decide to side with these criminal group of judges. Its as if being caught stealing & blaming the victim for catching you in the act.
Humanity 10 years ago

Yes, they take GHANAIAINS to be stupid...soon they will REALISE GHANAIANS aren't FOOLS and they are not GODS. NONSENCE

Yes, they take GHANAIAINS to be stupid...soon they will REALISE GHANAIANS aren't FOOLS and they are not GODS. NONSENCE
Akajatame 10 years ago

any judge that takes bribe in term of money,a house, a goat or a sheep must be put into prision.meaning he or she is also a thielf like how if i go and steal somebody cocoyam or cassava or coconut or money and they will Jeil ...
read full comment

any judge that takes bribe in term of money,a house, a goat or a sheep must be put into prision.meaning he or she is also a thielf like how if i go and steal somebody cocoyam or cassava or coconut or money and they will Jeil Me, they also.

DESTINY 10 years ago

The law suit in itself is an 'indictment'. It a presupposes that the video obtained was genuine!!! Ha ha. What a story! But it serves as a rude awakening.
However, will the country, and will we get to the level of accountab ...
read full comment

The law suit in itself is an 'indictment'. It a presupposes that the video obtained was genuine!!! Ha ha. What a story! But it serves as a rude awakening.
However, will the country, and will we get to the level of accountability that exists in the Western World?
JIMMY 10 years ago

PLEASE DO NOT SPOIL YOUR REPRETATION BY GOING TO COURT TO FIGHT A LOOSE BATTLE

PLEASE DO NOT SPOIL YOUR REPRETATION BY GOING TO COURT TO FIGHT A LOOSE BATTLE
Kolo 10 years ago

Corrupt judge seeking justices he had denied to innocent people. stupid man

Corrupt judge seeking justices he had denied to innocent people. stupid man
james asamiah 10 years ago

I guess the families who he wronged can also sue him kwasia

I guess the families who he wronged can also sue him kwasia
Esi 10 years ago

This man has no shame. Look at what Ghana has come to. Instead of bowing down his head in shame, he feels entitled enough to sue.

This man has no shame. Look at what Ghana has come to. Instead of bowing down his head in shame, he feels entitled enough to sue.
Ojay 10 years ago

JUDAS ISCARIOT JUDGE.COWARD JUDGE Bribe the judge who will sit on your CASE

JUDAS ISCARIOT JUDGE.COWARD JUDGE Bribe the judge who will sit on your CASE
DANIEL 10 years ago

Anas, chief justice and the Attorney General shuld just bribe the judge that wil sit on that case.
SOME PEOPLE DONT HAVE SHAME AT ALL. I MISS U JERRY JOHN RAWLINGS. THIS PEOPLE SHULD HAVE BEEN LINED UP AND SHOOT TO DEATH

Anas, chief justice and the Attorney General shuld just bribe the judge that wil sit on that case.
SOME PEOPLE DONT HAVE SHAME AT ALL. I MISS U JERRY JOHN RAWLINGS. THIS PEOPLE SHULD HAVE BEEN LINED UP AND SHOOT TO DEATH
Papa Yaw 10 years ago

So

So
Asoreba 10 years ago

Yes, let some other Judge take the case and give him a dose of his own medicine. For the cases he took bribe to deliver INJUSTICE, does he now wants JUSTICE for himself?

Yes, let some other Judge take the case and give him a dose of his own medicine. For the cases he took bribe to deliver INJUSTICE, does he now wants JUSTICE for himself?
Mensah 10 years ago

This judge has no shame and remorse. Does he know the disgrace, pain and agony he and his disgraceful colleagues have brought on our nation? and he has the gust to sue Anas? Justice Derry shame on you. You should bow down you ...
read full comment

This judge has no shame and remorse. Does he know the disgrace, pain and agony he and his disgraceful colleagues have brought on our nation? and he has the gust to sue Anas? Justice Derry shame on you. You should bow down your heard in shame. A criminal like you should be locked behind bars and the keys thrown to the deepest part of the sea.
Descartes 10 years ago

Even the FBI in United States uses "Agent Provocateurs" to get evidence.

Even the FBI in United States uses "Agent Provocateurs" to get evidence.
JJ 10 years ago

Anas has immunity under the Whistle Blower Act, you can't sue him. Shut up and take your just rewards, thief.

Anas has immunity under the Whistle Blower Act, you can't sue him. Shut up and take your just rewards, thief.
Kwame 10 years ago

The AG should prosecute those criminals. They have no shame. They were caught on video taking bribes and instead of doing the honorable thing, they keep being digging a deeper hole for themselves. A total disgrace!

The AG should prosecute those criminals. They have no shame. They were caught on video taking bribes and instead of doing the honorable thing, they keep being digging a deeper hole for themselves. A total disgrace!
Sarkodie 10 years ago

If this was military era all these judges would be 6 feet under.
Firing squad on the spot.

If this was military era all these judges would be 6 feet under.
Firing squad on the spot.
Akans. Prophecies 10 years ago

Death is not the answer , idiot.

Death is not the answer , idiot.
Akajatame 10 years ago

Mr president put them into jeil all of them FAST foolish and idiot judges.They put innocent people into jeil.FOOLISH and IDIOT judges again FOOLS.

Mr president put them into jeil all of them FAST foolish and idiot judges.They put innocent people into jeil.FOOLISH and IDIOT judges again FOOLS.
james asamiah 10 years ago

Show the video.

Show the video.
A T 10 years ago

This is the classic "Fight or Flight" game theory dilemma. Justice Derry wants to appear stoic and says that the recording was obtained unlawfully. Interesting that he is not denying the contents of the video recording but it ...
read full comment

This is the classic "Fight or Flight" game theory dilemma. Justice Derry wants to appear stoic and says that the recording was obtained unlawfully. Interesting that he is not denying the contents of the video recording but its legality!!! Where was he all the time that Anas has been recording and showing other people's acts of corruption??? Does he represent only himself or all Ghanaians?
Mubarak 10 years ago

In Ghana corruption is glorified and any one who atempts to expose corrupt practices is villified. Our justice system is rotten to the core but the bar and the bench don't want any cleaning. They prefer to maintain the status ...
read full comment

In Ghana corruption is glorified and any one who atempts to expose corrupt practices is villified. Our justice system is rotten to the core but the bar and the bench don't want any cleaning. They prefer to maintain the status quo so as to continue lining their pockets with illicit money and throw the innocent into jail.
Kwame USA 10 years ago

Each judge should get at least 50 years in prison. Anything else would be a miscarriage of justice

Each judge should get at least 50 years in prison. Anything else would be a miscarriage of justice
John,Tema 10 years ago

Who'll give that judgement?Is it going to be John Mahama?

Who'll give that judgement?Is it going to be John Mahama?
cool 10 years ago

Paul Dery Sue for what. You were a judge and you were caught on camera breaking the law and you want to sue. You once handled my case and took bribes from the other party. The case is still pending for 5 year. I'll be in Ghan ...
read full comment

Paul Dery Sue for what. You were a judge and you were caught on camera breaking the law and you want to sue. You once handled my case and took bribes from the other party. The case is still pending for 5 year. I'll be in Ghana with a loaded gun because of you and Mustapha Logoh
GAWUKO 10 years ago

Do the two always swap positions? Strange.

Do the two always swap positions? Strange.
Akonoba 10 years ago

You can not damage people's reputation to win awards and build your own reputation.

His (the man claiming to be called Anas) immunity is no immunity at all.

You can not damage people's reputation to win awards and build your own reputation.

His (the man claiming to be called Anas) immunity is no immunity at all.
Kb 10 years ago

y so you can build your reputation(judge) on the expenses of innocent life and blood(prisoners n victims?)?

y so you can build your reputation(judge) on the expenses of innocent life and blood(prisoners n victims?)?
Kwame 10 years ago

What about the damage corrupt judges have caused? The judges damaged their own reputation by acting like criminals. Should we allow thieves to steel freely, because if we prosecute them we damage their reputation too ....

What about the damage corrupt judges have caused? The judges damaged their own reputation by acting like criminals. Should we allow thieves to steel freely, because if we prosecute them we damage their reputation too ....
Stoway 10 years ago

Yes ooooh! The man is going ound the bend. I don't want to even call him a judge because he is not fit to be one.

Yes ooooh! The man is going ound the bend. I don't want to even call him a judge because he is not fit to be one.
Asafo Agladza 10 years ago

Akonoba, you must be a joker. Do you consider taking money to release hardened crimiminals and highway armed robbers back into the street is building a reputation?? I pray that none of these dangerous armed robbers that have ...
read full comment

Akonoba, you must be a joker. Do you consider taking money to release hardened crimiminals and highway armed robbers back into the street is building a reputation?? I pray that none of these dangerous armed robbers that have been released and who know no compassion do not confront you in your house after mid-night any day. You sound strage to me.
Nana Amankwah 10 years ago

If the vidéos are not shown publicly..on GTV trust me i will never payTV licence

If the vidéos are not shown publicly..on GTV trust me i will never payTV licence
kofi 10 years ago

derry the brother of npp s ambrose derry,hahahaha....the ndc had never won a case in this man court before,,,

derry the brother of npp s ambrose derry,hahahaha....the ndc had never won a case in this man court before,,,
Paul 10 years ago

Corrupt Paul Uuter Dery has no sense of shame. He should have buried his head in utter disgrace for all the extortion of innocent and poor people. He wants to bribe his way through again.

Corrupt Paul Uuter Dery has no sense of shame. He should have buried his head in utter disgrace for all the extortion of innocent and poor people. He wants to bribe his way through again.
John 10 years ago

...at least sacked and your pensions denied. See how you enjoy your life with no income, no pension and no more opportunity to extort bribes!

...at least sacked and your pensions denied. See how you enjoy your life with no income, no pension and no more opportunity to extort bribes!
BEN 10 years ago

LOOK AT THIS STUPID CORRUPT JUDGE. YOU THINK YOU HAVE THE LAW IN YOUR HANDS ERH!! ONYE WAAA

LOOK AT THIS STUPID CORRUPT JUDGE. YOU THINK YOU HAVE THE LAW IN YOUR HANDS ERH!! ONYE WAAA
KKO 10 years ago

An idiotic thief without shame!

An idiotic thief without shame!
Juan 10 years ago

A drowning person grabs anything s/he touches. The videos must be shown to the public. Injustice Paul Dery should have considered the illegality of always taking bribes. He cannot imagine himself being in the grip of the law ...
read full comment

A drowning person grabs anything s/he touches. The videos must be shown to the public. Injustice Paul Dery should have considered the illegality of always taking bribes. He cannot imagine himself being in the grip of the law that he had abused for so long. The evidences are clear. We thank Anas Aremeyaw Anas for the great job.
To restore investor and public confidence, these criminal judges and magistrates should be landed the maximum punishment.
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, ESQ. 10 years ago

BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, BARRISTER-AT LAW, QCL, PLC, DPA, CPA, BA (HONS) {GHANA}, MASTER OF LAWS (LLM) {NEW YORK, USA} PENDING, MEMBER, INTERNATIONAL (WORLD/GLOBAL) BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSO ...
read full comment

BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, BARRISTER-AT LAW, QCL, PLC, DPA, CPA, BA (HONS) {GHANA}, MASTER OF LAWS (LLM) {NEW YORK, USA} PENDING, MEMBER, INTERNATIONAL (WORLD/GLOBAL) BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATE MEMBER, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, GHANA BAR ASSOCIATION

EBAA LAW CONSULT
ORCA DECO (TOKU) BUILDING, 1ST
FLOOR
P.O. BOX AN 5966
ACCRA.
GHANA.

BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER photo BenonyTonyAmekudzi2.jpg

BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT

TEL: 0545758633

MOBILE NO: 0245848560

NOTE: (SENDING THIS E-MAIL AT HO IN THE VOLTA REGION OF GHANA)

TO: HER LADYSHIP CHIEF JUSTICE OF GHANA GEORGINA THEODORA WOOD
HON. MINISTER OF JUSTICE & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GHANA MARIETTA BREW
APPIAH OPPONG
HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT ADINYIRA
HON. PRESIDENT OF GHANA BAR ASSOCIATION NENE AMEGATCHER

INFO TO:
H.E.PRESIDENT OF GHANA DR.JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA
H.E.VICE PRESIDENT OF GHANA KWESI AMISSAH ARTHUR
RT.HON.SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT OF GHANA EDWARD DOE ADZAHO
HON. MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS & REGIONAL INTEGRATION HANNAH TETTEY
HON. MINISTER OF INTERIOR
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF GHANA POLICE SERVICE MOHAMMED ALHASSAN
DIRECTOR OF BNI

SPECIAL INFO ALERT TO:
H.E.DR.MR.PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARACK OBAMA
HON. SECRETARY OF STATE OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JOHN KERRY
DIRECTOR OF FBI

DATE: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2015
SUBJECT: AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND STAFF OF THE JUDICIAL SERVICE PURPORTED TO BE IMPLICATED BY THE SECRET VIDEO EXPOSE OF ANAS AMEREYAW ANAS TAKING COGNIZANCE OF ARTICLE 18 (2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION, THE EVIDENCE ACT AND THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF DECLARATIONS OF FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS, THERETO.
IT IS A TRITE LAW AND KNOWLEDGE THAT ANYTHING THAT TOUCHES AND CONCERNS "VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IS EQUALLY WRONG TO ADOPT "ILLEGAL AND CLANDESTINE SECRET MEANS TO OBTAIN ILLEGAL MATERIAL".
IT IS THEREFORE IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE THAT I AM RESPECTFULLY REFERRING TO ANAS AMEREYAW PHOTOGRAPHS BELOW AS EXAMPLE OF SOME OF THE ILLEGAL AND SECRET CLANDESTINE METHODS ADOPTED TO OBTAIN ILLEGAL MATERIALS/EVIDENCE, THERETO, BELOW:

Anas Aremeyaw Anas's photo.
Anas Aremeyaw Anas's photo.
Anas Aremeyaw Anas added 2 new photos — with Ibrahim Mohammed Hashimudeen and 8 others.

Anas Aremeyaw Anas Masked
Anas Aremeyaw Anas

IT IS THEREFORE AT THESE RELATED BACKDROPS THAT I AM AGAIN REVISITING AND TO PUT SAME IN ISSUE THE CASE THAT I HAVE ALREADY MADE AS FOLLOWS:

RE: THE LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE ANAS AREMEYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE 34 JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND 100 JUDICIAL STAFFS AND THE LEGAL POSITIONS AS A WAY FORWARD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA JURISPRUDENCE.REFRESHING MEMORIES AND UPDATE NOTES FOR THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PROTECTION OF ARTICLE 18 CLAUSES 1 & 2 OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF DECLARATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND

TAKING ALSO COGNIZANCE OF THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS AS FOLLOWS:

UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS
"Article 12.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour/honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks."

THAT A CLEAR CLASSICS CASES THAT CALL FOR THE PROTECTIONS OF SUCH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW RELATED RIGHTS ARE THE SECRET VIDEO TAPE RECORDINGS OF THE FOLLOWING WORLD LEADERS WHEN HIS/HER EXCELLENCIES WERE EVEN AT THE TOILETS AND THEIR PRIVACY WERE VIOLATED BY THE "SECRET ILLEGAL VIDEO RECORDERS FOR MISCHIEF AND OTHER CRIMINAL RELATED INTENDED PURPOSES, THERETO, AS FOLLOWS:
(i) H.E.DR.MR.PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARACK OBAMA
(ii) HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II
(iii) HIS PAPACY HOLY FATHER POPE FRANCIS !
(iv) H.E.RT.HON.PRIME MINISTER OF UNITED KINGDOM DAVID CAMERON
(v) H.E.PRESIDENT OF FRANCE FRANCOIS HOLLANDE
(vi) H.E. GERMAN CHANCELLOR ANGELA MERKEL
(vii) H.E.RT.HON.PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL BENJAMIN NETANYAHU
(viii)H.E.PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA VLADAMIR PUTIN
(ix) H.E. UNITED NATIONS SECRETARY GENERAL BAN-KI MOON
(x) HON. DALA MAI

THAT IT IS AGAINST THESE RELATED BACKDROPS THAT THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF GHANA, GOVERNMENT OF GHANA AND THE CIVILIZED WORLD TO CONSIDER IN THE BEST NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW INTERESTS TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS TO PRIVACY TO HELP REMOVE THE THREAT IT POSES TO THE CIVILIZED WORLD WHILE TO ADOPT A MORE OPEN AND TRANSPARENT MEANS AND WAYS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION AND CORRUPT PRACTICES NOT ONLY IN GHANA BUT ALSO IN THE CIVILIZED WORLD.
HOWEVER, MY RESPECTFUL SUBMISSION IS NOT INTENDED TO PLAY DOWN ON ANAS AMEREYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS INVESTIGATIONS SINCE "IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSED OF THE LAW" BUT TO HELP TO ENCOURAGE HIM AND OTHERS WITH GOODWILL AND GOOD INTENTIONS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION AND CORRUPT PRACTICES TO DO IT WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF THE LAW, THERETO.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
GOD BLESS GHANA, AMERICA, UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED NATIONS.
VERY TRULY YOURS,
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, ESQ.
INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT

From: benony amekudzi

To: Info ; President ; "Minister@Moj.gov.gh" ; President ; Info ; Barack Obama ; "secretary@state.gov" ; "Minister@Mfa.gov.gh" ; Vice ; "vicepresidents@whitehouse.gov" ; GovDelivery ; "president@ghanabar.org" ; White House ; BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI ; Pm ; "speaker@parliament.gh" ; "firstlady@oop.gov.gh" Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 4:31 AM Subject: THE LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE ANAS AREMEYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE 34 JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND 100 JUDICIAL STAFFS AND THE LEGAL POSITIONS AS A WAY FORWARD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA JURISPRUDENCE.

BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, BARRISTER-AT LAW, QCL, PLC, DPA, CPA, BA (HONS) {GHANA}, MASTER OF LAWS (LLM) {NEW YORK, USA} PENDING, MEMBER, INTERNATIONAL (WORLD/GLOBAL) BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMONWEALTH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATE MEMBER, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, GHANA BAR ASSOCIATION

EBAA LAW CONSULT
ORCA DECO (TOKU) BUILDING, 1ST
FLOOR
P.O. BOX AN 5966
ACCRA.
GHANA.

BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER photo BenonyTonyAmekudzi2.jpg

BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT

TEL: 0545758633

MOBILE NO: 0245848560

NOTE: (SENDING THIS E-MAIL AT HO IN THE VOLTA REGION OF GHANA)

TO: HER LADYSHIP CHIEF JUSTICE OF GHANA GEORGINA THEODORA WOOD
HON. MINISTER OF JUSTICE & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GHANA MARIETTA BREW APPIAH-OPPONG
HON. JUDICIAL SECRETARY OF GHANA
HON. PRESIDENT OF GHANA BAR ASSOCIATION NENE AMEGATCHER

INFO TO:
H.E.PRESIDENT OF GHANA DR. JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA
H.E.VICE PRESIDENT OF GHANA KWESI AMISSAH ARTHUR
RT. HON. SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT OF GHANA EDWARD DOE ADZAHO
HON. MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS & REGIONAL INTEGRATION HANNAH TETTEY
HON. MINISTER OF VOLTA REGION OF GHANA HELEN ADJOA NTOSU

SPECIAL INFO ALERT TO:
H.E.DR.MR.PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARACK OBAMA
H.E. RT. HON.PRIME MINISTER OF UNITED KINGDOM DAVID CAMERON
HON. SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH
HON. SECRETARY OF STATE OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JOHN KERRY

DATE: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2015
HON. CHIEF OF STAFF AT FLAGSTAFF HOUSE JULIUS DEBRAH
SUBJECT:THE LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE ANAS AREMEYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE 34 JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND 100 JUDICIAL STAFFS AND THE LEGAL POSITIONS AS A WAY FORWARD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA JURISPRUDENCE.

MAY I RESPECTFULLY AND HUMBLY SUBMIT MY CANDID OPINION ON THE ABOVE RELATED DICEY MATTER FIRST AS A GHANAIAN LAWYER WHO ALSO BELONGED TO OTHER BAR ASSOCIATIONS AND AS INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT.
THAT IT IS A TRITE LAW AND KNOWLEDGE THAT MATTERS/ISSUES THAT HINGED ON THE LAW ARE DEEMED TO SEEN AND TO BE TREATED FROM THE LEGAL "PAR LANCE" PERSPECTIVE POINTS OF LEGAL VIEWS.
THIS IS BECAUSE MATTERS CONCERNING LAW AND MORALS ARE SEEN DIFFERENTLY SO FAR AS THE LAW IS CONCERNED.
IT IS THEREFORE IN THE LIGHT OF ABOVE THAT THE LAWS OF GHANA AS OTHER LAWS OF OTHER COUNTRIES ARE ALSO CODIFIED OR WRITTEN, THERETO.
THAT THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF GHANA BELONG TO THE "COMMON LAW TRADITION/JURISDICTION" AND FOR THAT MATTER THE "COMMON LAW" IS PART OF THE LAWS OF GHANA AND GHANA CAN THEREFORE RESERVED THE RIGHT TO CITE OR USE THE CASE LAWS OF THE "COMMON LAW JURISDICTIONS".
THAT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND UNITED KINGDOM AS OTHER COUNTRIES BELONGED TO THE "COMMON LAW TRADITIONS/JURISDICTIONS" AND THEREFORE GHANA JUDICIAL AND LEGAL SYSTEMS CAN AND COULD CITE CASE LAWS FROM THESE JURISDICTIONS AS "PERSUASIVE AUTHORITIES", THERETO.
THAT TAKING COGNIZANCE ALSO OF THE FACT THAT GHANA IS A SIGNITORIES TO INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND CONVENTIONS UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH, UNITED NATIONS, AFRICAN UNION, ECOWAS AND OTHERS, THERETO.
HOWEVER, IT IS SUFFICIENT JUST TO CITE ONLY THESE FEW INSTANCES ABOVE AND TO RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT THAT "ALL APPLICABLE LAWS ARE DEEM TO APPLY TO A CASE AT THE COURTS OF LAW WHENEVER, THERE IS ENSUING LITIGATION, THERETO.
THAT UNDER GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION, CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW AND THE EVIDENCE ACT INCLUDING THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ARE DEEM TO APPLY TO THE CASE OF ANAS AMEREYAW SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF GHANA 34 JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND OVER 100 JUDICIAL STAFF PURPORTED TO BE SECRETLY VIDEO BY ANS THAT ALLEGED CORRUPTION AND CORRUPT PRACTICES OF THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND THE JUDICIAL STAFF AS PUBLISHED BELOW BY THE "STARR FM ONLINE".
THAT AS A GHANAIAN LAWYER, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER AND LEGAL CONSULTANT THAT IT BEHOOVES ON ME TO RENDER MY CANDID LEGAL OPINION ON THE MATTER TO HELP IN THE EXPOSITION OF THE LEGAL POSITIONS ON THE MATTER TO HELP ADVANCE THE COURSE/CAUSE OF JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW.
THAT GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION CLEARLY PROVIDES FOR THE PROTECTION OF PRIVACY OF HOMES AND PROPERTY AS FOLLOWS:

GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION
PROTECTION OF PRIVACY OF HOME AND OTHER PROPERTY
"
18. (1) Every person has the right to own property either alone or in association with others.

(2) No person shall be subjected to interference with the privacy of his home, property, correspondence or communication except in accordance with law and as may be necessary in a free and democratic society for public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the protection of the rights or freedoms of others "

THAT FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF ANY RELATED DOUBTS, WHATSOEVER, THAT I PERSONALLY WILL NEVER CONDONE CRIME AND MOREOVER TO PURPORT TO DEFEND CRIME, HOWEVER, AS GHANAIAN LAWYER, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND LEGAL CONSULTANT IT BEHOOVES ON ME TO HELP STATE THE POSITIONS OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND ALL OTHER LAWS THAT ARE DEEM TO APPLY TO THE CASE UNDER REVIEW AND IN VIEW ALSO OF THE POSITIONS OF
THE SAME LAWS PROTECTING ANAS AMEREYAW WHEN HE UNDERTOOK THAT ONEROUS RESPONSIBILITY, THERETO.
THAT IT IS IN VIEW OF SUCH LEGAL ANALYSIS THAT CLEARLY CALLS TO ISSUE TO PROPER AND TRUE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 18 (2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION THAT PROVIDES FOR

No person shall be subjected to interference with the privacy of his home, property, correspondence or communication except in accordance with law and as may be necessary in a free and democratic society for public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the protection of the rights or freedoms of others "

IT IS IN LIGHT OF THE ABOVE THAT MAKES ANAS AMEREYAW CASE VERY DICEY AND THE LEGAL ISSUE THEREFORE TO BE DETERMINED "WHETHER OR NOT BEFORE ANAS EMBARKED ON HIS SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS INVESTIGATIONS OF THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND OTHER JUDICIAL STAFF HE WAS SUPPOSED TO OBTAIN "A VALID COURT ORDER AS A PROTECTION?"
FURTHER, WHETHER OR NOT HIS PETITION TO H.E.PRESIDENT OF GHANA DR.JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA AND HON.MINISTER OF JUSTICE & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GHANA MARIETTA BREW APPIAH-OPPONG WHEN HE PRESENTED HIS SECRET INVESTIGATIONS REPORT AND HE WAS GRANTED "IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS" SERVED AS A RELIEF FROM NOT OBTAINING THE VALID COURT ORDER BEFORE EMBARKING ON THE SECRET INVESTIGATIONS, THERETO? OR THE "IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITIES HAS BEEN BACK DATED TO COVER THE BEGINNING OF THE SECRET INVESTIGATIONS, THERETO?"
IF YES, THEN WHAT IS THE POSITION OF THE RULE OF LAW? BUT IF THE ANSWER IS NO THEN WHAT IS THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS, THERETO?
THAT IT IS MY RESPECTFUL AND HUMBLE SUBMISSION THAT ANSWERS TO THE ABOVE RELATED QUESTIONS WILL HELP PAVE WAY TO THE RESOLUTIONS OR DETERMINATIONS OF THE ANAS CASE, THERETO.
THAT THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND LEGISLATIVE INTENT OF ARTICLE 18 CLAUSES1 & 2 TO BE TAKEN A JUDICIAL NOTICE AT WHEN BOTH GHANA JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND LAWYERS DEDICATED EVERY YEAR JUNE 30 AS "MATYRS DAY" AND DULY OBSERVED SAME SINCE OUR DEAR THREE (3) HIGH COURT JUSTICES AND ARMY OFFICER WERE ALL PICKED UP FROM THEIR VARIOUS HOUSES AND WERE MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD AND BURNT INTO ASHES INCLUDING THE LATE MR.ANKRA FROM AGORTIME- AFEGAME WHO WAS ALSO PICKED FROM HIS HOUSE AT NIGHT AND MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD AND ALSO BURNT IN ASHES. HOWEVER, HIS CASE NEVER RECEIVED NATIONAL ATTENTION AS IT OUGHT TO GAIN AT THE TIME.
THAT REALLY CALLS FOR THE NEED TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY OF HOMES AND PROPERTY.
THAT IN THE CASE OF CLEMENCE ATIASU VRS. THE REPUBLIC (SUIT NO.P22CLEMENT ATIA/9/2015) THAT CAME ON APPEAL AT THE HIGH COURT-2, HO IN THE VOLTA REGION OF GHANA PRESIDED OVER BY HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE PATRICK BAAYEH THAT SIMILAR ARGUMENTS WERE MADE BY ME WHEN I WAS THE COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT WHEN THE POLICE OF THE NARCOTIC UNIT FROM THE VOLTA REGIONAL POLICE HEADQUARTERS WITHOUT "A VALID SEARCH WARRANT" CONDUCTED AN ILLEGAL SEARCH AT 4.30AM AT THE APPELLANT HOUSE AT KPEDZE IN THE VOLTA REGION AT THE TIME THE APPELLANT JUST RETURNED FROM A FUNERAL AT AVE- DAKPA AT 9.30PM WHEN HE INTIMATED THAT SOMEONE POSED A THREAT AGAINST HIS LIFE THAT HE WAS GOING TO SHOW HIM AND AT DAWN POLICE OFFICERS FROM THE NARCOTICS UNIT CAME TO HIS HOUSE AND CONDUCTED ILLEGAL SEARCH AND RETRIEVED "CANIBIS" WHICH TESTED POSITIVE AND HE WAS CHARGED FOR CULTIVATION AND POSSESSION OF "CANIBIS SUBSTANCE".
THAT THE ARGUMENTS I MADE USING ARTICLE 18 (2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND THE EVIDENCE ACT AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW THAT THE HIGH COURT TO OVER-TURN THE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGEMENT AND TO ACQUIT AND DISCHARGE THE APPELLANT WAS REJECTED BY THE HIGH COURT AND EVEN THE CASE MADE ON THE APPELLANT SERIOUS HEALTH CONDITIONS REPORTED BY HO PRISON MEDIUM AUTHORITIES WAS ALSO REJECTED BY THE HIGH COURT.
HOWEVER, HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE PATRICK BAAYEH IN HIS JUDGEMENT CLEARLY STATED THAT IT IS ONLY H.E.PRESIDENT OF GHANA DR.JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA ALONE WHO CAN OR COULD GRANT THE APPELLANT PARDON.
IT IS THEREFORE, SURPRISING THAT THE APPELLANT HAS NOT BEEN GRANTED THE PARDON UPTIL NOW.
IT IS THEREFORE, MY RESPECTFUL AND HUMBLE SUBMISSION THAT LEGAL EFFECT TO BE GIVEN IN A FAIR MEANS AND MANNER TO THE INTERPRETATIONS AND APPLICATIONS OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND OTHER LAWS OF GHANA TAKING INTO CONTEMPLATION ALSO THE INTERNATIONAL LAW.
IT IS THEREFORE AT THESE RELATED BACKDROPS THAT I AM RESPECTFULLY OBLIGED TO REFER TO THE EVIDENCE ACT OF GHANA AND GHANA COMMUNICATIONS ACT AND HUMBLY SUBMIT AS FOLLOWS:

THAT SECTION 94 OF THE EVIDENCE ACT (ACT 30/60) DULY PROVIDES AGAINST "ILLEGAL SEARCHES, THAT IS, SEARCHES WITHOUT A VALID SEARCH WARRANT BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION".
THAT IN THE CASE OF ANAS WHO CONDUCTED A SECRET VIDEO RECORDINGS OF THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES IN QUESTION WITHOUT OBTAINING "A VALID COURT ORDER" IN VIEW OF THE EXCLUSIONARY EVIDENTIAL RULES THAT "ANY ILLEGAL MATERIAL OBTAINED THROUGH ILLEGAL MEANS THAT THE EVIDENTIAL ILLEGAL MATERIALS ARE EXCLUSIVE FROM THE RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND IF THEY ARE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE RECORDS IT SERVED AS "POISONOUS" UNDER THE "DOCTRINE OF THE POISONOUS TREE, A PRINCIPLE OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND IN GHANA UNDER THE EXCLUSIONARY EVIDENCE RULE THAT SUCH ILLEGAL OBTAINED MATERIALS TO BE 'EXPUNGED FROM THE RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS".
THEREFORE, THE SECRET VIDEO TAPE RECORDINGS OF ANAS AMEREYAW CLEARLY FALLS UNDER THE EXCLUSIONARY EVIDENCE RULE AND TO BE RENDERED A NULLITY, THERETO.
THAT TAKING ALSO COGNIZANCE OF THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS AS FOLLOWS:

UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 12.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

IT IS THEREFORE FOR THE SAKE OF JUSTICE AND PROTECTIONS OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND THE INTERNATIONAL LAW THAT I AM RESPECTFULLY CITING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE BELOW AS "A PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY" AND ALSO TO HELP GHANA JUDICIAL COUNCIL AND GOVERNMENT OF GHANA TO HELP REFORM GHANA JUDICIAL SYSTEM TO REALLY FIT INTO THE GLOBAL LEGAL AND JUDICIAL SYSTEMS OF THE 21ST CENTURY WORLD TO HELP DEVELOP GHANA JURISPRUDENCE AS A WAY FORWARD, THERETO.

PLEASE, REFER TO THE CASE BELOW:

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOURTH (4TH) AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RIGHTS AND CASE LAW AS AN "ORBITA DICTA" OR PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY:

United States Supreme Court
MAPP v. OHIO, (1961)
No. 236
Argued: March 29, 1961 Decided: June 19, 1961
All evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Federal Constitution is inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court. Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 , overruled insofar as it holds to the contrary. Pp. 643-660.
170 Ohio St. 427, 166 N. E. 2d 387, reversed.
A. L. Kearns argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Walter L. Greene.
Gertrude Bauer Mahon argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief was John T. Corrigan.
Bernard A. Berkman argued the cause for the American Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief was Rowland Watts.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant stands convicted of knowingly having had in her possession and under her control certain lewd and lascivious books, pictures, and photographs in violation of 2905.34 of Ohio's Revised Code. 1 As officially stated in the syllabus to its opinion, the Supreme Court of Ohio found that her conviction was valid though "based primarily upon the introduction in evidence of lewd and lascivious books and pictures unlawfully seized during an unlawful search of defendant's home . . . ." 170 Ohio St. 427-428, 166 N. E. 2d 387, 388. [367 U.S. 643, 644]
On May 23, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at appellant's residence in that city pursuant to information that "a person [was] hiding out in the home, who was wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing, and that there was a large amount of policy paraphernalia being hidden in the home." Miss Mapp and her daughter by a former marriage lived on the top floor of the two-family dwelling. Upon their arrival at that house, the officers knocked on the door and demanded entrance but appellant, after telephoning her attorney, refused to admit them without a search warrant. They advised their headquarters of the situation and undertook a surveillance of the house.
The officers again sought entrance some three hours later when four or more additional officers arrived on the scene. When Miss Mapp did not come to the door immediately, at least one of the several doors to the house was forcibly opened 2 and the policemen gained admittance. Meanwhile Miss Mapp's attorney arrived, but the officers, having secured their own entry, and continuing in their defiance of the law, would permit him neither to see Miss Mapp nor to enter the house. It appears that Miss Mapp was halfway down the stairs from the upper floor to the front door when the officers, in this highhanded manner, broke into the hall. She demanded to see the search warrant. A paper, claimed to be a warrant, was held up by one of the officers. She grabbed the "warrant" and placed it in her bosom. A struggle ensued in which the officers recovered the piece of paper and as a result of which they handcuffed appellant because she had been "belligerent" [367 U.S. 643, 645] in resisting their official rescue of the "warrant" from her person. Running roughshod over appellant, a policeman "grabbed" her, "twisted [her] hand," and she "yelled [and] pleaded with him" because "it was hurting." Appellant, in handcuffs, was then forcibly taken upstairs to her bedroom where the officers searched a dresser, a chest of drawers, a closet and some suitcases. They also looked into a photo album and through personal papers belonging to the appellant. The search spread to the rest of the second floor including the child's bedroom, the living room, the kitchen and a dinette. The basement of the building and a trunk found therein were also searched. The obscene materials for possession of which she was ultimately convicted were discovered in the course of that widespread search.
At the trial no search warrant was produced by the prosecution, nor was the failure to produce one explained or accounted for. At best, "There is, in the record, considerable doubt as to whether there ever was any warrant for the search of defendant's home." 170 Ohio St., at 430, 166 N. E. 2d, at 389. The Ohio Supreme Court believed a "reasonable argument" could be made that the conviction should be reversed "because the `methods' employed to obtain the [evidence] . . . were such as to `offend "a sense of justice,"'" but the court found determinative the fact that the evidence had not been taken "from defendant's person by the use of brutal or offensive physical force against defendant." 170 Ohio St., at 431, 166 N. E. 2d, at 389-390.
The State says that even if the search were made without authority, or otherwise unreasonably, it is not prevented from using the unconstitutionally seized evidence at trial, citing Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949), in which this Court did indeed hold "that in a prosecution in a State court for a State crime the Fourteenth Amendment [367 U.S. 643, 646] does not forbid the admission of evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure." At p. 33. On this appeal, of which we have noted probable jurisdiction, 364 U.S. 868 , it is urged once again that we review that holding. 3
I.
Seventy-five years ago, in Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 630 (1886), considering the Fourth 4 and Fifth Amendments as running "almost into each other" 5 on the facts before it, this Court held that the doctrines of those Amendments
"apply to all invasions on the part of the government and its employes of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life. It is not the breaking of his doors, and the rummaging of his drawers, [367 U.S. 643, 647] that constitutes the essence of the offence; but it is the invasion of his indefeasible right of personal security, personal liberty and private property . . . . Breaking into a house and opening boxes and drawers are circumstances of aggravation; but any forcible and compulsory extortion of a man's own testimony or of his private papers to be used as evidence to convict him of crime or to forfeit his goods, is within the condemnation . . . [of those Amendments]."
The Court noted that
"constitutional provisions for the security of person and property should be liberally construed. . . . It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon." At p. 635.
In this jealous regard for maintaining the integrity of individual rights, the Court gave life to Madison's prediction that "independent tribunals of justice . . . will be naturally led to resist every encroachment upon rights expressly stipulated for in the Constitution by the declaration of rights." I Annals of Cong. 439 (1789). Concluding, the Court specifically referred to the use of the evidence there seized as "unconstitutional." At p. 638.
Less than 30 years after Boyd, this Court, in Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), stated that
"the Fourth Amendment . . . put the courts of the United States and Federal officials, in the exercise of their power and authority, under limitations and restraints [and] . . . forever secure[d] the people, their persons, houses, papers and effects against all unreasonable searches and seizures under the guise of law . . . and the duty of giving to it force and effect is obligatory upon all entrusted under our Federal system with the enforcement of the laws." At pp. 391-392. [367 U.S. 643, 648]
Specifically dealing with the use of the evidence unconstitutionally seized, the Court concluded:
"If letters and private documents can thus be seized and held and used in evidence against a citizen accused of an offense, the protection of the Fourth Amendment declaring his right to be secure against such searches and seizures is of no value, and, so far as those thus placed are concerned, might as well be stricken from the Constitution. The efforts of the courts and their officials to bring the guilty to punishment, praiseworthy as they are, are not to be aided by the sacrifice of those great principles established by years of endeavor and suffering which have resulted in their embodiment in the fundamental law of the land." At p. 393.
Finally, the Court in that case clearly stated that use of the seized evidence involved "a denial of the constitutional rights of the accused." At p. 398. Thus, in the year 1914, in the Weeks case, this Court "for the first time" held that "in a federal prosecution the Fourth Amendment barred the use of evidence secured through an illegal search and seizure." Wolf v. Colorado, supra, at 28. This Court has ever since required of federal law officers a strict adherence to that command which this Court has held to be a clear, specific, and constitutionally required - even if judicially implied - deterrent safeguard without insistence upon which the Fourth Amendment would have been reduced to "a form of words." Holmes, J., Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385, 392 (1920). It meant, quite simply, that "conviction by means of unlawful seizures and enforced confessions . . . should find no sanction in the judgments of the courts . . .," Weeks v. United States, supra, at 392, and that such evidence "shall not be used at all." Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, supra, at 392. [367 U.S. 643, 649]
There are in the cases of this Court some passing references to the Weeks rule as being one of evidence. But the plain and unequivocal language of Weeks - and its later paraphrase in Wolf - to the effect that the Weeks rule is of constitutional origin, remains entirely undisturbed. In Byars v. United States, 273 U.S. 28 (1927), a unanimous Court declared that "the doctrine [cannot] . . . be tolerated under our constitutional system, that evidences of crime discovered by a federal officer in making a search without lawful warrant may be used against the victim of the unlawful search where a timely challenge has been interposed." At pp. 29-30 (emphasis added). The Court, in Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), in unmistakable language restated the Weeks rule:
"The striking outcome of the Weeks case and those which followed it was the sweeping declaration that the Fourth Amendment, although not referring to or limiting the use of evidence in courts, really forbade its introduction if obtained by government officers through a violation of the Amendment." At p. 462.
In McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943), we note this statement:
"[A] conviction in the federal courts, the foundation of which is evidence obtained in disregard of liberties deemed fundamental by the Constitution, cannot stand. Boyd v. United States . . . Weeks v. United States . . . And this Court has, on Constitutional grounds, set aside convictions, both in the federal and state courts, which were based upon confessions `secured by protracted and repeated questioning of ignorant and untutored persons, in whose minds the power of officers was greatly magnified' [367 U.S. 643, 650] . . . or `who have been unlawfully held incommunicado without advice of friends or counsel' . . . ." At pp. 339-340.
Significantly in McNabb, the Court did then pass on to formulate a rule of evidence, saying, "[i]n the view we take of the case, however, it becomes unnecessary to reach the Constitutional issue [for] . . . [t]he principles governing the admissibility of evidence in federal criminal trials have not been restricted . . . to those derived solely from the Constitution." At pp. 340-341.
II.
In 1949, 35 years after Weeks was announced, this Court, in Wolf v. Colorado, supra, again for the first time, 6 discussed the effect of the Fourth Amendment upon the States through the operation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It said:
"[W]e have no hesitation in saying that were a State affirmatively to sanction such police incursion into privacy it would run counter to the guaranty of the Fourteenth Amendment." At p. 28.
Nevertheless, after declaring that the "security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion by the police" is "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty' and as such enforceable against the States through the Due Process Clause," cf. Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937), and announcing that it "stoutly adhere[d]" to the Weeks decision, the Court decided that the Weeks exclusionary rule would not then be imposed upon the States as "an essential ingredient of the right." 338 U.S., at 27 -29. The Court's reasons for not considering essential to the [367 U.S. 643, 651] right to privacy, as a curb imposed upon the States by the Due Process Clause, that which decades before had been posited as part and parcel of the Fourth Amendment's limitation upon federal encroachment of individual privacy, were bottomed on factual considerations.
While they are not basically relevant to a decision that the exclusionary rule is an essential ingredient of the Fourth Amendment as the right it embodies is vouchsafed against the States by the Due Process Clause, we will consider the current validity of the factual grounds upon which Wolf was based.
The Court in Wolf first stated that "[t]he contrariety of views of the States" on the adoption of the exclusionary rule of Weeks was "particularly impressive" (at p. 29); and, in this connection, that it could not "brush aside the experience of States which deem the incidence of such conduct by the police too slight to call for a deterrent remedy . . . by overriding the [States'] relevant rules of evidence." At pp. 31-32. While in 1949, prior to the Wolf case, almost two-thirds of the States were opposed to the use of the exclusionary rule, now, despite the Wolf case, more than half of those since passing upon it, by their own legislative or judicial decision, have wholly or partly adopted or adhered to the Weeks rule. See Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 , Appendix, pp. 224-232 (1960). Significantly, among those now following the rule is California, which, according to its highest court, was "compelled to reach that conclusion because other remedies have completely failed to secure compliance with the constitutional provisions . . . ." People v. Cahan, 44 Cal. 2d 434, 445, 282 P.2d 905, 911 (1955). In connection with this California case, we note that the second basis elaborated in Wolf in support of its failure to enforce the exclusionary doctrine against the States was that "other means of protection" have been afforded "the [367 U.S. 643, 652] right to privacy." 7 338 U.S., at 30 . The experience of California that such other remedies have been worthless and futile is buttressed by the experience of other States. The obvious futility of relegating the Fourth Amendment to the protection of other remedies has, moreover, been [367 U.S. 643, 653] recognized by this Court since Wolf. See Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 137 (1954).
Likewise, time has set its face against what Wolf called the "weighty testimony" of People v. Defore, 242 N. Y. 13, 150 N. E. 585 (1926). There Justice (then Judge) Cardozo, rejecting adoption of the Weeks exclusionary rule in New York, had said that "[t]he Federal rule as it stands is either too strict or too lax." 242 N. Y., at 22, 150 N. E., at 588. However, the force of that reasoning has been largely vitiated by later decisions of this Court. These include the recent discarding of the "silver platter" doctrine which allowed federal judicial use of evidence seized in violation of the Constitution by state agents, Elkins v. United States, supra; the relaxation of the formerly strict requirements as to standing to challenge the use of evidence thus seized, so that now the procedure of exclusion, "ultimately referable to constitutional safeguards," is available to anyone even "legitimately on [the] premises" unlawfully searched, Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 266 -267 (1960); and, finally, the formulation of a method to prevent state use of evidence unconstitutionally seized by federal agents, Rea v. United States, 350 U.S. 214 (1956). Because there can be no fixed formula, we are admittedly met with "recurring questions of the reasonableness of searches," but less is not to be expected when dealing with a Constitution, and, at any rate, "[r]easonableness is in the first instance for the [trial court] . . . to determine." United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 63 (1950).
It, therefore, plainly appears that the factual considerations supporting the failure of the Wolf Court to include the Weeks exclusionary rule when it recognized the enforceability of the right to privacy against the States in 1949, while not basically relevant to the constitutional consideration, could not, in any analysis, now be deemed controlling. [367 U.S. 643, 654]
III.
Some five years after Wolf, in answer to a plea made here Term after Term that we overturn its doctrine on applicability of the Weeks exclusionary rule, this Court indicated that such should not be done until the States had "adequate opportunity to adopt or reject the [Weeks] rule." Irvine v. California, supra, at 134. There again it was said:
"Never until June of 1949 did this Court hold the basic search-and-seizure prohibition in any way applicable to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment." Ibid.
And only last Term, after again carefully re-examining the Wolf doctrine in Elkins v. United States, supra, the Court pointed out that "the controlling principles" as to search and seizure and the problem of admissibility "seemed clear" (at p. 212) until the announcement in Wolf "that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not itself require state courts to adopt the exclusionary rule" of the Weeks case. At p. 213. At the same time, the Court pointed out, "the underlying constitutional doctrine which Wolf established . . . that the Federal Constitution . . . prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures by state officers" had undermined the "foundation upon which the admissibility of state-seized evidence in a federal trial originally rested . . . ." Ibid. The Court concluded that it was therefore obliged to hold, although it chose the narrower ground on which to do so, that all evidence obtained by an unconstitutional search and seizure was inadmissible in a federal court regardless of its source. Today we once again examine Wolf's constitutional documentation of the right to privacy free from unreasonable state intrusion, and, after its dozen years on our books, are led by it to close the only [367 U.S. 643, 655] courtroom door remaining open to evidence secured by official lawlessness in flagrant abuse of that basic right, reserved to all persons as a specific guarantee against that very same unlawful conduct. We hold that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is, by that same authority, inadmissible in a state court.
IV.
Since the Fourth Amendment's right of privacy has been declared enforceable against the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth, it is enforceable against them by the same sanction of exclusion as is used against the Federal Government. Were it otherwise, then just as without the Weeks rule the assurance against unreasonable federal searches and seizures would be "a form of words," valueless and undeserving of mention in a perpetual charter of inestimable human liberties, so too, without that rule the freedom from state invasions of privacy would be so ephemeral and so neatly severed from its conceptual nexus with the freedom from all brutish means of coercing evidence as not to merit this Court's high regard as a freedom "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty." At the time that the Court held in Wolf that the Amendment was applicable to the States through the Due Process Clause, the cases of this Court, as we have seen, had steadfastly held that as to federal officers the Fourth Amendment included the exclusion of the evidence seized in violation of its provisions. Even Wolf "stoutly adhered" to that proposition. The right to privacy, when conceded operatively enforceable against the States, was not susceptible of destruction by avulsion of the sanction upon which its protection and enjoyment had always been deemed dependent under the Boyd, Weeks and Silverthorne cases. Therefore, in extending the substantive protections of due process to all constitutionally unreasonable searches - state or federal - it was [367 U.S. 643, 656] logically and constitutionally necessary that the exclusion doctrine - an essential part of the right to privacy - be also insisted upon as an essential ingredient of the right newly recognized by the Wolf case. In short, the admission of the new constitutional right by Wolf could not consistently tolerate denial of its most important constitutional privilege, namely, the exclusion of the evidence which an accused had been forced to give by reason of the unlawful seizure. To hold otherwise is to grant the right but in reality to withhold its privilege and enjoyment. Only last year the Court itself recognized that the purpose of the exclusionary rule "is to deter - to compel respect for the constitutional guaranty in the only effectively available way - by removing the incentive to disregard it." Elkins v. United States, supra, at 217.
Indeed, we are aware of no restraint, similar to that rejected today, conditioning the enforcement of any other basic constitutional right. The right to privacy, no less important than any other right carefully and particularly reserved to the people, would stand in marked contrast to all other rights declared as "basic to a free society." Wolf v. Colorado, supra, at

THAT IT IS IN THE LIGHT OF ABOVE THAT THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOM OF THE PERSON AND PEOPLE TO BE RESPECTED, PROTECTED AND TO BE DEFENDED IN A FREE DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY.

THAT IT IS THE MOTTO AND PRINCIPLE OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION THAT "DEFENDING LIBERTY WHILE PURSUING JUSTICE"

IT IS THEREFORE MY RESPECTFUL SUBMISSION AND CANDID OPINION THAT SINCE ANAS EXPOSE FAILED, NEGLECTED AND REFUSED TO RESPECT AND OBEY ARTICLE 18 (2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION, THE EVIDENCE ACT AND THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER OF FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY OBTAINING A VALID COURT ORDER BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION OR THE EXPOSE WAS ALSO NOT DONE IN AN OPEN AND TRANSPARENT MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW THAT THE ANAS VIDEO EXPOSE IS DEEM ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED AS A LAWFUL EVIDENTIAL MATERIAL.

THAT IN VIEW ALSO OF THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE 'WHETHER OR NOT ANY LEGALITY CAN RESULT OUT OF ILLEGAL ACTS OF BOTH PARTIES OR PERSONS AS IN THE CASE OF ANAS AMEREYAW ANAS EXPOSE?"

THAT IT HAS BECOME VERY NECESSARY AND ALSO VERY DICEY IF THE ASSERTION AND CLAIM MADE BY "SIR JOHN" FORMER GENERAL SECRETARY OF NPP THAT "THEY HAVE SOME INVINCIBLE FORCES WORKING FOR THEM AND THEIR RESULT WOULD SOON BE KNOWN?"

THAT ASSUMING AND GRANTING THAT WE ARE LIVING IN THE PHYSICAL AND VISIBLE WORLD AND THERE WAS A CLAIM THAT THERE ARE "SOME INVISIBLE FORCES ALSO WORKING UNKNOWN TO THOSE OF US LIVING REASONABLE IN THE VISIBLE , OPEN AND TRANSPARENT WORLD AND THE LEGAL ISSUE THEREFORE "WHO IS ANAS AND WHAT IS/WAS HIS "MODUS OPERANDI" OF THE ANAS EXPOSE?

IT IS THEREFORE MY HUMBLE AND CANDID SUBMISSION THAT THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL COMMITTEE TO SERIOUSLY WEIGH, ANALYZE AND EVALUATE ALL THESE RELATED LEGAL ISSUES/MATTERS VERY CAREFULLY TO DISMISS THE CASE MADE AGAINST THE JUDGES/MAGISTRATES AND THE JUDICIAL STAFF IMPLICATED BY ANAS SECRET VIDEO TO HELP PROTECT PRIVACY OF HOME, PROPERTY, COMMUNICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE AS PROVIDED UNDER ARTICLE 18(2) OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND UNITED NATIONS CHARTER ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOM.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

GOD BLESS GHANA , AMERICA. UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED NATIONS.

VERY TRULY YOURS,

BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, ESQ.

INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT
BOOY 10 years ago

frustrated Derry

frustrated Derry
kofi adu 10 years ago

Suit or no suit, what? Dery wake up.

Suit or no suit, what? Dery wake up.
fredsaid 10 years ago

The corrupt judges will go down but not without a fight to save their shameful arses. The had to take some crazy action for their survival. Are they saying the national interest is surbordinate to their corrupt reputations? ...
read full comment

The corrupt judges will go down but not without a fight to save their shameful arses. The had to take some crazy action for their survival. Are they saying the national interest is surbordinate to their corrupt reputations? I beg to differ.
Volta Region 10 years ago

Thief thief thief disgraceful Father,husband,brother etc,go to hell Mr Derry.

Thief thief thief disgraceful Father,husband,brother etc,go to hell Mr Derry.
Ghanaman 10 years ago

You deliver Judgement not Justice God will definitely punish you with stoke

You deliver Judgement not Justice God will definitely punish you with stoke
BRO 10 years ago

fuck you DERRY,who the hell do you think you are. Are you better Ghanaians who put you to power or you think you are above the law that Ghanaian's must bow before you, IDIOT.You are disgrace to the whole nation and yet you ha ...
read full comment

fuck you DERRY,who the hell do you think you are. Are you better Ghanaians who put you to power or you think you are above the law that Ghanaian's must bow before you, IDIOT.You are disgrace to the whole nation and yet you have effrontery to sue journalist. you think you and your colleges can you TAKASHIE to get away with this heavy crime.Beside do you think we Ghanaians are stupid to waist our time and resource to see you thieves drag dis to court to defend yourself. bear in mind a thief is always thief and you are not going to get away with it IDIOT .kwasiaaa JUDGES,How about the innocent life you have taken bribe to destroy their futures and even killed in the process and you think you deserve to leave. YOU CAN GO TO HELL, FUCK YOU AND YOUR ENTIRE COLLEGES WHO ARE PART OF THIS CORRUPTION,ALL OF YOU WILL NEVER KNOW PIECE TILL YOU ALL DIE...THIEVES,THIEVES,THIEVES,DISGRACE TO MOTHER GHANA AND THE WHOLE WORLD......BITCHES, WEEKED SOULS.....if they cut all of you lose then it means ALL THE JUDICIARIES ARE CORRUPT, THEN IT MEANS, THERE IS NO LAW TO THE HIGHEST LEVEL....INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT AND HIS CABINET... WAYOME CASE MUST BE RE-OPEN AGAIN ASAPS....TO BRING OUT ALL THOSE INVOLVE.....
kwakuvi Williams 10 years ago

how they obtained the video is immaterial did u or did u not take the bribe dishonouable judge forget about how anas obtained the video

how they obtained the video is immaterial did u or did u not take the bribe dishonouable judge forget about how anas obtained the video
Nana Malik 10 years ago

Shameless Dery

Shameless Dery
Osei kuffour 10 years ago

I keep saying it's the educated Ghanain with a PHD that makes the abongo like Rawlings comes and rule, and then they tell us that Rawlings did take we back 20 years in development .
Look a thief caught on camera had to ball ...
read full comment

I keep saying it's the educated Ghanain with a PHD that makes the abongo like Rawlings comes and rule, and then they tell us that Rawlings did take we back 20 years in development .
Look a thief caught on camera had to balls to go sue .. Smfh .. Another Rawlings will come if we don't change our way of life .. And this time .. The socalled men of God will be shot too .
Thieves
Maame! 10 years ago

Hahahahhahahaha drowning man clinging to a last straw!!! Foolish man!!

Hahahahhahahaha drowning man clinging to a last straw!!! Foolish man!!
Last warrior 10 years ago

This just another way to delay showing the video and also name the other two judges whose name is being protected by the government

This just another way to delay showing the video and also name the other two judges whose name is being protected by the government
Empty bottle makes the most noice 10 years ago

Look at who is seeking for justice, but u denied justice by collecting koobi n momone to overturn someone's verdict, ah mother ghana,God have mercy,ghana will be more than corrupt if these guys are allowed to go unpunished

Look at who is seeking for justice, but u denied justice by collecting koobi n momone to overturn someone's verdict, ah mother ghana,God have mercy,ghana will be more than corrupt if these guys are allowed to go unpunished
WAA LOOK 10 years ago

Hahahaaaaaa hahahaaaaaa these NDC thieves will never cease to amaze me........... Suing Anas after being caught red handed?........ This is bullshit paaaaaaaaa....

Hahahaaaaaa hahahaaaaaa these NDC thieves will never cease to amaze me........... Suing Anas after being caught red handed?........ This is bullshit paaaaaaaaa....
inercycl 10 years ago

He has every right to sue if he strongly believes those who have been robbed by armed robbers that he has set free, also have the right to sue him.

He has every right to sue if he strongly believes those who have been robbed by armed robbers that he has set free, also have the right to sue him.
Yahaya Hamidu 10 years ago

Justice Dery please dont provoke the anger of Ghanaians in this action you are going to take.

Justice Dery please dont provoke the anger of Ghanaians in this action you are going to take.
BRO 10 years ago

You see when they tender evidence or exhibit against client in court, they easily pass judgment because they have exhibit and immediately uses it to sentence people now that, they have exhibit or prove against them, they want ...
read full comment

You see when they tender evidence or exhibit against client in court, they easily pass judgment because they have exhibit and immediately uses it to sentence people now that, they have exhibit or prove against them, they want to tell as that it can not be used against them, Waoooo what a world we are leaving in. like i said there are no excuses what so ever for them to stand on or to get away with it, so you the JUDICIARY committee should prove to Ghanaians they still have fate in you and sentence these judges to minimum of 70years each imprisonment for them to also to feel the prison.BEAR IN MIND NO ONE IS ABOVE THE FUCKING LAW...so Don't waste time because the EXHIBIT ARE THERE BEFORE YOU GUYS SO ACT QUICK AND STOP DRAGGING AND SYMPATHIZING WITH THESE USELESS DISGRACEFUL thieves JUDGES...because they are yr OWN......
Nana Yaw 10 years ago

He is granted immunity. Thus, you cannot sue him. Hahaha idiot.

He is granted immunity. Thus, you cannot sue him. Hahaha idiot.
seisek 10 years ago

Justice Derry, I am saddened to hear that you have sued Anas for your bribery scandal because he did not obtain permission from you. Sorry. I wanted to ask you if you never knew that the money you were receiving was meant to ...
read full comment

Justice Derry, I am saddened to hear that you have sued Anas for your bribery scandal because he did not obtain permission from you. Sorry. I wanted to ask you if you never knew that the money you were receiving was meant to tamper justice. Did you also not know that you sworn an oath to uphold justice at anytime and in the course of your duties. Please just bow down your head in shame and stop all this rubbish by suing Anas.
inercycl 10 years ago

He needs to get off the hook first.Maybe after serving time in jail, he will think twice.

He needs to get off the hook first.Maybe after serving time in jail, he will think twice.
KOO THE BOY 10 years ago

why are you suing. you took the bribe.no judicial rangling is going to erase that fact

why are you suing. you took the bribe.no judicial rangling is going to erase that fact
oko 10 years ago

This is a test case of Necessity and Proportionality of disclosure of information. Anas disclosed this as a balance between what the public interets is and would be for this rot this Justice did.

He has no case to answer

This is a test case of Necessity and Proportionality of disclosure of information. Anas disclosed this as a balance between what the public interets is and would be for this rot this Justice did.

He has no case to answer
opuni 10 years ago

Is it true that Anas is currently enjoying immunities under whistle blower act ?

Is it true that Anas is currently enjoying immunities under whistle blower act ?
OBINNA 10 years ago

GHANAIANS ARE NOW GROWING UP TO LEARN THAT THERE IS ANOTHER TOOL IN THE PRACTICE OF DEMOCRATIC GORVENANCE CALLED INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM. THESE JUDGES ARE LEARNING THIS FACT THE VERY HARD WAY AND CANNOT BELIEVE WHAT IS HAPPE ...
read full comment

GHANAIANS ARE NOW GROWING UP TO LEARN THAT THERE IS ANOTHER TOOL IN THE PRACTICE OF DEMOCRATIC GORVENANCE CALLED INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM. THESE JUDGES ARE LEARNING THIS FACT THE VERY HARD WAY AND CANNOT BELIEVE WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. IN THE WEST, IT IS A MAJOR TOOL TO UNEARTH THE BAD APPLES IN THE SOCIETY. THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA MUST STAND ASTUTE AND DELIVER TO THESE CORRUPT JUDGES ( AND TO THE SOCIETY AS A WHOLE) THE RIGHT MESSAGE
nii nii niiiii 10 years ago

Anas did it for all Ghanaians. There should not be any politics in the matter.He was caught and no excuses.Thus time,the masses will not tolerate this kind if corruption.I nearly lost a property as the judgment was by consent ...
read full comment

Anas did it for all Ghanaians. There should not be any politics in the matter.He was caught and no excuses.Thus time,the masses will not tolerate this kind if corruption.I nearly lost a property as the judgment was by consent when I had been wronged,and the thief got away.
WORRIED GHANAIAN 10 years ago

Hey, Anas let me tell u something, Justice Derry thinks he is too clever, if he thinks he is too clever in collecting bribes he will not have been expose. he is sueing u to come in public for people to see who is behind expos ...
read full comment

Hey, Anas let me tell u something, Justice Derry thinks he is too clever, if he thinks he is too clever in collecting bribes he will not have been expose. he is sueing u to come in public for people to see who is behind exposing the bad and curropt people in Ghana so that Ghanaians or the whole will know or see you in person. Derry and the rest of lawyers who are tieve with power and pride. Shame unto you all judges who took the bribe. Justice Derry, shame unto u. U should not have come out to tell the world that u are going to sue Anas. Anas is a brave man who fears nothing. He will always come out with true identity of corrupt people in Ghana. Mr. president, tell ur parliamentarians to voice all what they have taken and chopped because Anas is going to come out with their bad deeds. God will always be with Anas and no body in this world will see him in person.
DESTINY 10 years ago

Anas, this is from a student lawyer somewhere outside Ghana. CONGRATULATIONS. The judge cannot sue somebody/something that does not exist. Please do it Saddam Hussein style, and create dooubles of yourself. 'That way', PERHAP ...
read full comment

Anas, this is from a student lawyer somewhere outside Ghana. CONGRATULATIONS. The judge cannot sue somebody/something that does not exist. Please do it Saddam Hussein style, and create dooubles of yourself. 'That way', PERHAPS your own wife cannot identify you, let alone THESE CORRUPT JUDGES. This is the panacea Ghana needs and deserves-EXPOSING EVIL TO PROVOKE TRANSPARENCY.
May God Richly Bless you, and Protect you as well. AMEN!
KingTampo 10 years ago

This so-called 'Judge' Derry must be stupid or think that Ghanaians are stupid. What Anas uncovered is more important than how he obtained his FACTS. Derry should also know that Anas has been granted immunity from prosecution ...
read full comment

This so-called 'Judge' Derry must be stupid or think that Ghanaians are stupid. What Anas uncovered is more important than how he obtained his FACTS. Derry should also know that Anas has been granted immunity from prosecution (persecution?) - both civil and criminal.
E. Amoako 10 years ago

Shame shame SHAME!!! If there is God, He will panish you

Shame shame SHAME!!! If there is God, He will panish you
toxic 10 years ago

shame to justice dery.he doesnt know what he is doing

shame to justice dery.he doesnt know what he is doing
King 10 years ago

Silly judge!Go to hell!

Silly judge!Go to hell!
back door director 10 years ago

The gloves are off. All those with an axe to grind with Judge Dery please come forward.
Dery you are a disgrace to northerners and dagartis

The gloves are off. All those with an axe to grind with Judge Dery please come forward.
Dery you are a disgrace to northerners and dagartis
Gold 10 years ago

Could any one tell us some of the well known cases handled by Derry? Was he the Judge who returned the seized passports of Mr & Mrs Asamoah Boateng?

Could any one tell us some of the well known cases handled by Derry? Was he the Judge who returned the seized passports of Mr & Mrs Asamoah Boateng?
dery thiefman 10 years ago

sir, you are taking bribe. can i obtain a video footage?

sir, you are taking bribe. can i obtain a video footage?
Alhassan Bedie 10 years ago

Foolish Judge. If you play the fool, Anas will expose you more so think twice, Foolish man

Foolish Judge. If you play the fool, Anas will expose you more so think twice, Foolish man
kofi 10 years ago

THIEF. YOU COLLECTED BRIBE AND LET LOOSE POLICE ROBBERS AND THEY ARE BACK IN THE SERVICE. SHAME SHAME. YOU AND ESSEL MENSA TAHODA JUDGE GOD HAS PUNISHED YOU.
FOR DESTROYING THE GHANA POLICE SERVICE THIS IS YOUR END

THIEF. YOU COLLECTED BRIBE AND LET LOOSE POLICE ROBBERS AND THEY ARE BACK IN THE SERVICE. SHAME SHAME. YOU AND ESSEL MENSA TAHODA JUDGE GOD HAS PUNISHED YOU.
FOR DESTROYING THE GHANA POLICE SERVICE THIS IS YOUR END
ghanaian italian 10 years ago

Oh no, this man (Anas) need a spiritual and ficical protection. So fellow Ghanaians lnstead of sitting down and writing comments let pray for him so Jahovah God will protect him from this evil judges. Because he (Anas) is no ...
read full comment

Oh no, this man (Anas) need a spiritual and ficical protection. So fellow Ghanaians lnstead of sitting down and writing comments let pray for him so Jahovah God will protect him from this evil judges. Because he (Anas) is now their enemy, because of his good job.May the Lord protect him, Amen
kofi 10 years ago

LOOK AT HOW ESSEL MENSA HAS BEEN COLLECTING BRIBES AND SUPPORTING SOME CRIMINALS LIKE TAHODA IN THE POLICE SERVICE

LOOK AT HOW ESSEL MENSA HAS BEEN COLLECTING BRIBES AND SUPPORTING SOME CRIMINALS LIKE TAHODA IN THE POLICE SERVICE
Papa 10 years ago

Show the video... so all of us can make our layman's judgement

Show the video... so all of us can make our layman's judgement
Gyeeda, Subah, Sada, Woyome 10 years ago

What a foolish man we have as a judge. He collects bribe and free criminals thereby putting innocent ones in danger. He gets caught ON TAPE and still has the nerve to sue Anas for catching him accepting bribe. This man must ...
read full comment

What a foolish man we have as a judge. He collects bribe and free criminals thereby putting innocent ones in danger. He gets caught ON TAPE and still has the nerve to sue Anas for catching him accepting bribe. This man must be shot in the head. What a fool we have as a judge.
Mrs. Rebecca Akufo-Addo 10 years ago

Let's allow the legal minds to work

Let's allow the legal minds to work
andy 10 years ago

The supreme court judges were part of the corrupted judges but been censor.Ghana is a country of thieves and lies.

The supreme court judges were part of the corrupted judges but been censor.Ghana is a country of thieves and lies.
joe 10 years ago

The tape should be showed quickly to see who should be behind bars by now. I'm wondering why they a still roaming on the street and making noise. They should be tried by jury to avoid another bribe scandal

The tape should be showed quickly to see who should be behind bars by now. I'm wondering why they a still roaming on the street and making noise. They should be tried by jury to avoid another bribe scandal
Rant 10 years ago

Hilarious

Hilarious
penpenaaa-usa 10 years ago

This judge has no shame. You are caught on camera taking bribe and instead of apologising for ur misconduct,you rather is suing. That's Ghana for you. If this had happened in a developed country,you will be going from media h ...
read full comment

This judge has no shame. You are caught on camera taking bribe and instead of apologising for ur misconduct,you rather is suing. That's Ghana for you. If this had happened in a developed country,you will be going from media houses apologising to clear your name. Here in Ghana he has the nerves to sue. Shame on you
mobydick 10 years ago

ALUTA!!! Now Anas, let the gathered information flow on all media. We, the people will support you, defend you and sit as judges in all suits against you. We shall mobilise all resources to defend you. Fellow Ghanaians, le ...
read full comment

ALUTA!!! Now Anas, let the gathered information flow on all media. We, the people will support you, defend you and sit as judges in all suits against you. We shall mobilise all resources to defend you. Fellow Ghanaians, let us immediately form SUPPORT ANAS CLUB to mobilise our resources to defend him morally, financially and legally.
anyemi 10 years ago

Now, now, The Honorable Mr. Derry, do you mean to tell us that when a thief is caught, he should be set free because "the eyes of the catcher" were "improper?" Remember you are the judge to begin with!

Now, now, The Honorable Mr. Derry, do you mean to tell us that when a thief is caught, he should be set free because "the eyes of the catcher" were "improper?" Remember you are the judge to begin with!
NYAME 10 years ago

What he did is unlawful .Taking bribe is unconstitutional.He should be ashamed of himself.How will Ghana be great with such criminals.
ARREST him and sentence him for 100 yrs

What he did is unlawful .Taking bribe is unconstitutional.He should be ashamed of himself.How will Ghana be great with such criminals.
ARREST him and sentence him for 100 yrs
Mr. Mensah 10 years ago

I THINK WE GO BACK TO THE REVOLUTION DAYS AND STOP STUPID DEFENCE FROM SOME OF THESE 'THIEVES IN WHITE WIGS'.WHAT ARE THEY TAKING GHANAIANS FOR .IF THE PROCESS YOU USE TO ARREST A THIEF IS EVEN ILLEGAL DOES IT MAKE THE CRIMI ...
read full comment

I THINK WE GO BACK TO THE REVOLUTION DAYS AND STOP STUPID DEFENCE FROM SOME OF THESE 'THIEVES IN WHITE WIGS'.WHAT ARE THEY TAKING GHANAIANS FOR .IF THE PROCESS YOU USE TO ARREST A THIEF IS EVEN ILLEGAL DOES IT MAKE THE CRIMINAL ACT WEAK, DEFENSIBLE AND RIGHT? I NEED SOME EDUCATION
S.K 10 years ago

That man should stop, if I'm one of them by now i don't know where i will have been. shame to all the corup once Ghana will not forgive them.

That man should stop, if I'm one of them by now i don't know where i will have been. shame to all the corup once Ghana will not forgive them.
Yellow man 10 years ago

This guy have the audacity,impunity,nerve and balls to challenge the evidence?Instead of bowing your shameful face and ask the nation for forgiveness you rather protest your innocence by accusing Anas of obtaining incriminat ...
read full comment

This guy have the audacity,impunity,nerve and balls to challenge the evidence?Instead of bowing your shameful face and ask the nation for forgiveness you rather protest your innocence by accusing Anas of obtaining incriminating evidence unlawful.This is really ghana where the wrong is seen as right and right as wrong.
Crackadoddledooooo 10 years ago

WHAT A LOAD OF NONSENSE. THE CORRUPT JUDGE IS TRYING TO USE THE SYSTEM TO PROTECT HIMSELF. HE SHOULD GO TO HELL. THIS IS UTTERLY ANNOYING TO READ AND THE QUICKER THESE THIEVES OF TRUTH ARE EXPOSED BY AIRING THE VUDEO AND DEAL ...
read full comment

WHAT A LOAD OF NONSENSE. THE CORRUPT JUDGE IS TRYING TO USE THE SYSTEM TO PROTECT HIMSELF. HE SHOULD GO TO HELL. THIS IS UTTERLY ANNOYING TO READ AND THE QUICKER THESE THIEVES OF TRUTH ARE EXPOSED BY AIRING THE VUDEO AND DEALT WITH THE BETTER.
Mensah Abrampa 10 years ago

He wants justice but he denies other citizens of the same right by taking bribes and administering INJUSTICE.There are no tangible excuses for a judge to administer injustice instead of the JUSTICE he swore the oath to admini ...
read full comment

He wants justice but he denies other citizens of the same right by taking bribes and administering INJUSTICE.There are no tangible excuses for a judge to administer injustice instead of the JUSTICE he swore the oath to administer without fear or favor andwithout prejudice.
The question is why is bribery and corruption so prevalent in every aspect of our daily lives? It's because our system allows it. And why does our governmental systems turn the blind eye? The answer is simple. There's widespread poverty which the government does not feel obliged to do anything about. Instead of taking the hard but sensible decisions that would create the enabling environment for the creation of millions of jobs including high paying jobs the government takes what appears to be an easy solution but really a very foolish and very expensive choice to make. Turn a blind eye and deaf ears and that creates a free for all bribery and corruption state. When everyone is involved who will complain? The Mahama administration is a wilful sponsor of state bribery and corruption. They're in it big time thinking no one will have cause to complain because we're all there together in the mud. If my assessment is wrong why hasn't the administration done anything about it? Bribery and corruption is no longer a well kept secret. What message is the President sending to all Ghanaians if he treats corrupt appointees with kid gloves by merely reshuffling them or simply re-assigning them to the presidency? The hard to digest truth is that the President and most if not all the people he has surrounded himself with are corrupt to the bone. That's the general public perception of this NDC Administration. The only people who may disagree with this assertion are those who suffer from chronic cronyism and partisanship.
Brofo 10 years ago

The impudence of a foolish judge....Idiot

The impudence of a foolish judge....Idiot
Jorotara 10 years ago

is he normal or he is under the influence of PITO?
He should be jailed!

is he normal or he is under the influence of PITO?
He should be jailed!
Lawyer KD 10 years ago

Is this man not even ashamed of his evil deeds. He can sue but they should remember judges are not supper humans. Justice my foot

Is this man not even ashamed of his evil deeds. He can sue but they should remember judges are not supper humans. Justice my foot
Kofi 10 years ago

Thanks, Lawyer KD. You are the :SMART LAWYER"

Thanks, Lawyer KD. You are the :SMART LAWYER"
Smart Lawyer 10 years ago

I throw the book at the law school and the judiciary on exemption to immunity. It is ridiculously absurd to consider just the face of this case and to provide an immunity. Some of us, educated in law, deserve better than this ...
read full comment

I throw the book at the law school and the judiciary on exemption to immunity. It is ridiculously absurd to consider just the face of this case and to provide an immunity. Some of us, educated in law, deserve better than this. There are so many unanswered questions.
Kofi 10 years ago

You saying that you are educated and we are stupid!!Your day will come "SMART LAWYER'. You're telling the world how uneducated you are.

You saying that you are educated and we are stupid!!Your day will come "SMART LAWYER'. You're telling the world how uneducated you are.
Smart Lawyer 10 years ago

you talking about. It's not too late for you to read LAW. Kofi, you should not demonstrate your uneducated self. You should try to be flexible in your head as the world is changing for smarts and analytics.

you talking about. It's not too late for you to read LAW. Kofi, you should not demonstrate your uneducated self. You should try to be flexible in your head as the world is changing for smarts and analytics.
Stephen a mintah-ajumako kokoben 10 years ago

Go go go, shame,shame, going to court. U see how it is when truth is chancing u for justice. U will surely been in jail mark my words.

Go go go, shame,shame, going to court. U see how it is when truth is chancing u for justice. U will surely been in jail mark my words.
kk 10 years ago

This suit must be thrown out of court

This suit must be thrown out of court
Kofi 10 years ago

Look at this idiot oooo.Derry or whatever you call yourself,I never knew you are so stupid.Instead of being submissive and apologetic you are flexing muscles.Or do you think you can bribe the Judge who is going to preside ove ...
read full comment

Look at this idiot oooo.Derry or whatever you call yourself,I never knew you are so stupid.Instead of being submissive and apologetic you are flexing muscles.Or do you think you can bribe the Judge who is going to preside over your case you've filed? Wise up and stop disgracing literates....
Sam 10 years ago

He should go back to school, u don't need a legal permit to gather information on someone committing a crime. He is a public officer so anyone can gather information on his work, but not on his private life.

He should go back to school, u don't need a legal permit to gather information on someone committing a crime. He is a public officer so anyone can gather information on his work, but not on his private life.
Abeiku SW2 London 10 years ago

Why r u suing if u are clean ... Big man

Why r u suing if u are clean ... Big man
Dusseldorf 10 years ago

SHAME ON TO YOU. GHANA BELONGS TO GHANAIANS NOT TO THIEFS. THIS GUYS SHOULD GO TO JAIL.

SHAME ON TO YOU. GHANA BELONGS TO GHANAIANS NOT TO THIEFS. THIS GUYS SHOULD GO TO JAIL.
sergio 10 years ago

So is this judge looking justice ?
After taking bribe n sending innocent people to jail he have the guts to seek justice.

So is this judge looking justice ?
After taking bribe n sending innocent people to jail he have the guts to seek justice.
Ben, U.S. 10 years ago

I'll contribute to Anas defense fund!!

I'll contribute to Anas defense fund!!
ADAMU 10 years ago

DERRY DON,T BE SIIIIILLLLY. WHEN U WERE TAKING THE BRIBES U DIDN.T KNOW THAT THE COURTS WERE THERE.

DERRY DON,T BE SIIIIILLLLY. WHEN U WERE TAKING THE BRIBES U DIDN.T KNOW THAT THE COURTS WERE THERE.
Kofi Boahen Paris 10 years ago

STUPID DERRY THE THIEF WHO DOESN'T KNOW SHAME. GOD WILL PUNISH YOU FOR CONDEMNING INNOCENT SOULS.

STUPID DERRY THE THIEF WHO DOESN'T KNOW SHAME. GOD WILL PUNISH YOU FOR CONDEMNING INNOCENT SOULS.
Raymond Abbiw 10 years ago

He know he's lost his job and can no longer receive anymore bribes.
Shameless financial rapist.

He know he's lost his job and can no longer receive anymore bribes.
Shameless financial rapist.
bazly alhaq 10 years ago

This our intellectuals and leaders God have mercy on us

This our intellectuals and leaders God have mercy on us
armforces 10 years ago

I don't blame the judges because we are governing by a corrupt administration.

I don't blame the judges because we are governing by a corrupt administration.
mawriz 10 years ago

But you know most of these judges were there before the administration

But you know most of these judges were there before the administration
Eugene 10 years ago

shameful way to redeem yourself. U are the biggest joker of 21st centuary.

shameful way to redeem yourself. U are the biggest joker of 21st centuary.
Gbagbladza 10 years ago

OoH now I think am getting an answer to a question I have been asking myself since 1979 as to how on earth human beings could do such an unthinkable evil but today it seems am smelling the answer. God help us

OoH now I think am getting an answer to a question I have been asking myself since 1979 as to how on earth human beings could do such an unthinkable evil but today it seems am smelling the answer. God help us
ToTheMarrow 10 years ago

Shame onto this corrupt man. He has no sense of remorse. His sentence should be doubled when he is proven guilty for the bribery CRIME. SHAME!!!

Shame onto this corrupt man. He has no sense of remorse. His sentence should be doubled when he is proven guilty for the bribery CRIME. SHAME!!!
other 10 years ago

why is it that he beilieves the way Anas gets his proof is unlawful but he himself taking bribes is ok

why is it that he beilieves the way Anas gets his proof is unlawful but he himself taking bribes is ok
Future President¹²³ 10 years ago

I just realized this high court judge doesn't understand what immunity means. He's just making noise. Anas can't be sued for whatever process he underwent to unearth the judicial corruption

I just realized this high court judge doesn't understand what immunity means. He's just making noise. Anas can't be sued for whatever process he underwent to unearth the judicial corruption
Yaa 10 years ago

Plss save your words,He's probably goin to "BRIBE" the judge(another thief) who Ll sit on his case....He got nothing to loose,bcux he knows what he 's doin....SHAME....

Plss save your words,He's probably goin to "BRIBE" the judge(another thief) who Ll sit on his case....He got nothing to loose,bcux he knows what he 's doin....SHAME....
Yaa 10 years ago

Ghanaian judges always see themselves us "Mini Gods".
But Mr.Derry must'nt see himself us such....He must think abt this and bowdown instead of sueing Anas....He cnt be sued Since He has the evidence.....I cnt wait to watch ...
read full comment

Ghanaian judges always see themselves us "Mini Gods".
But Mr.Derry must'nt see himself us such....He must think abt this and bowdown instead of sueing Anas....He cnt be sued Since He has the evidence.....I cnt wait to watch the vedio....
Whatever 10 years ago

Me I saw it coming that was why I was warning Anas to think...The judges are going to tell the courts that they were TRICKED INTO TAKING the bribes by Anas who was busily engaged in subterfuge together with others with the ai ...
read full comment

Me I saw it coming that was why I was warning Anas to think...The judges are going to tell the courts that they were TRICKED INTO TAKING the bribes by Anas who was busily engaged in subterfuge together with others with the aim of making a name for himself. People don't even understand how the law works and they are condemning the judges. How did Anas know where judges were in such and such meetings? They will hang him! If you doing things, think about thoroughly before you do it.
Otoo Douglas 10 years ago

Now the judges who throw n rubishes the evidence of their friend lawyers seeking for legal lawyer in the court of law? ooooo la laaaaaa..... Yu can't fool people all the time.

Now the judges who throw n rubishes the evidence of their friend lawyers seeking for legal lawyer in the court of law? ooooo la laaaaaa..... Yu can't fool people all the time.
Ibn Adam : CanadasheabutterGhUWR 10 years ago

Does anyone have a clue whether they are related _ reason Nandomlaas are very much respected when it comes to ethnics

Does anyone have a clue whether they are related _ reason Nandomlaas are very much respected when it comes to ethnics
mawriz 10 years ago

Not important

Not important
NHYIRA BA 10 years ago

WHY IS JUSTICE DERRY IN A RUN TO SUE ANAS ?IS IT BECAUSE HE IS BEING CAUGHT? SHAME ON YOU.YOUR CUP IS OVERLY FLOWN. GHANA IS TO KILL BRIBE.BRIBE DO NOT BRING JUSTICE.

WHY IS JUSTICE DERRY IN A RUN TO SUE ANAS ?IS IT BECAUSE HE IS BEING CAUGHT? SHAME ON YOU.YOUR CUP IS OVERLY FLOWN. GHANA IS TO KILL BRIBE.BRIBE DO NOT BRING JUSTICE.
tkn 10 years ago

HE HAS LOST HIS MIND

HE HAS LOST HIS MIND
Manny 10 years ago

Jerry Rawlings has been right all along about these Judges. He knew how currupted they are, the same reason why he setup the tribunal at Gonja barracks to bypass them. How would Justice Derry feel if the the judge selected to ...
read full comment

Jerry Rawlings has been right all along about these Judges. He knew how currupted they are, the same reason why he setup the tribunal at Gonja barracks to bypass them. How would Justice Derry feel if the the judge selected to adjudicate his case took bribes from Anas, CJ and the Gov't? Shame on him!
OWUOMPOSURO 10 years ago

This is GOING TO BE NEW GHANA. We are coming after you all at the helm of authority who think they own GHANA. GHANA is going to taste it's "BLOODY REVOLUTION EVER" JJ Pls repond. We r ready.

This is GOING TO BE NEW GHANA. We are coming after you all at the helm of authority who think they own GHANA. GHANA is going to taste it's "BLOODY REVOLUTION EVER" JJ Pls repond. We r ready.
DAGARA PRIDE 10 years ago

Why are you suing if you are not guilt?.

Why are you suing if you are not guilt?.
American Boy 10 years ago

Suing for being exposed to be corrupt and taking bribes! This is insane. This judge has the nerve. He should be jailed immediately. What constitutional grounds does he stand on. We have investigative journalists in USA all th ...
read full comment

Suing for being exposed to be corrupt and taking bribes! This is insane. This judge has the nerve. He should be jailed immediately. What constitutional grounds does he stand on. We have investigative journalists in USA all the time exposing corrupt dealings in Ghana. Anas do not let these corrupt judges intimidate you. The whole country is behind you.
T D INKOOM 10 years ago

MAN SHOW HIS FOLLOW MAN HOW WISE HE IS.STUPID JUDGE IF U WERE A ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIST N A WOMAN SHOW HER VAGINA TO YOU,YOU WOULD FUCK N TEL GOD THAT U WERE TEMTED.STUPID,STOP THAT

MAN SHOW HIS FOLLOW MAN HOW WISE HE IS.STUPID JUDGE IF U WERE A ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIST N A WOMAN SHOW HER VAGINA TO YOU,YOU WOULD FUCK N TEL GOD THAT U WERE TEMTED.STUPID,STOP THAT
Plasma Kote 10 years ago

I hope it is just a story, suing for what ??,

I hope it is just a story, suing for what ??,
Plasma Kote 10 years ago

He cannot represent himself

He cannot represent himself
Paa Joe 10 years ago

HOW COME THAT A CRIMINAL JUDGE DERRY TO SUE ANAS.´

HAS HE NO SHAME.

HOW COME THAT A CRIMINAL JUDGE DERRY TO SUE ANAS.´

HAS HE NO SHAME.
Concerned Ghanaian 10 years ago

The greatest fool awards go to His foolishness Injustice Derry.

The greatest fool awards go to His foolishness Injustice Derry.
Kofi, USA 10 years ago

JOY FM LIES EXPOSED AGAIN.
THIS TIME VERY SHAMEFULLY.

According to Joy fm,they've detected on IMF website that any country that crosses the threshold of 70% of debt to GDP ratio then the country is HIPC.
This is a comp ...
read full comment

JOY FM LIES EXPOSED AGAIN.
THIS TIME VERY SHAMEFULLY.

According to Joy fm,they've detected on IMF website that any country that crosses the threshold of 70% of debt to GDP ratio then the country is HIPC.
This is a complete lie, fallacy and a figment their own imagination.

1.There is no resolution, convention or law from IMF or any of the Bretton Wood Institutions which says that any country with debt to GDP of more than 70% shld be classified as HIPC.

2.They also say that if Ghana's debt is shared amongst the people in the country each one will be owing ghc3600 but mischievously they ddn't consider the fact that if the assets of the country is also shared each person will have ghc5360 based on the current GDP.

3.The following are the debt to GDP ratio of countries with even strong and resilient economies.

JAPAN 230%
GREECE 177%
ITALY 132%
CAPE VERDE 144.22%
BELGIUM 106.5%
UNITED STATES 102.98%
SINGAPORE 99.30%
SPAIN 97.7%
FRANCE 95.00%
EGYPT 90.5%
U.K 89.40%
JORDAN 86.68%
ZIMBABWE 77.00%
GERMANY 74.70%
UKRAINE 71.21 %
GHANA 71%

So Joy fm is telling us that all these countries are officially HIPC countries logic???..Shame unto JOY FM.
Plasma Kote 10 years ago

Not financial matters.

Not financial matters.
Anbatrazume 10 years ago

Let's ask Derry, "did he receive bribes or not?"this is what he should have been fighting for but not how his love for illegal money has come to the public. Those judges who refused the bribes have nothing to sue. Derry is a ...
read full comment

Let's ask Derry, "did he receive bribes or not?"this is what he should have been fighting for but not how his love for illegal money has come to the public. Those judges who refused the bribes have nothing to sue. Derry is a big disgrace to the legal regime. Shame unto him
Kofi 10 years ago

Unlawfully? Do you know what is lawful?

Unlawfully? Do you know what is lawful?
Kofi 10 years ago

Anas is our savior. He is immune from the law. Anyone who rises against him rises against the poor masses. And we shall rise against him.

Anas is our savior. He is immune from the law. Anyone who rises against him rises against the poor masses. And we shall rise against him.
SME 10 years ago

That's what I am talking about. If they go after Anas, go after them.

Enough is enough!!

That's what I am talking about. If they go after Anas, go after them.

Enough is enough!!
fidelity 10 years ago

Paul Derry shame on you.

Paul Derry shame on you.
Lee Jesus 10 years ago

YOU HAVE BEING CAUGHT SHUT UR BIG MOUTH

YOU HAVE BEING CAUGHT SHUT UR BIG MOUTH
AMINA 10 years ago

THIEF DERRY, YOU WILL COMMIT SUICIDE. ARE U SEEKING JUSTICE WHICH YOU GREEDILY SOLD OUT FOR A GOAT? YOU ARE A DISGRACE TO OUR DEMOCRATIC PROCESS. IF IT WAS RAWLINGSES JUNE 4, GUESS WHAT, YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN HISTORY. CORRUPT M ...
read full comment

THIEF DERRY, YOU WILL COMMIT SUICIDE. ARE U SEEKING JUSTICE WHICH YOU GREEDILY SOLD OUT FOR A GOAT? YOU ARE A DISGRACE TO OUR DEMOCRATIC PROCESS. IF IT WAS RAWLINGSES JUNE 4, GUESS WHAT, YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN HISTORY. CORRUPT MAN
JJR 10 years ago

WOYOME IS SHAKEN, HOW MUCH DID HE PAY TO AJET NASSAM? WELL HE MUST PRAY THAT THE APPEAL IS NOT REVERSED BECAUSE CLEARLY, THAT GOAGT OF A JUDGE WAS BRIBED TO GIVE THAT BOGUS RULING THAT FREED HIM. WE LIVE TO SEE

WOYOME IS SHAKEN, HOW MUCH DID HE PAY TO AJET NASSAM? WELL HE MUST PRAY THAT THE APPEAL IS NOT REVERSED BECAUSE CLEARLY, THAT GOAGT OF A JUDGE WAS BRIBED TO GIVE THAT BOGUS RULING THAT FREED HIM. WE LIVE TO SEE
ibrahim 10 years ago

see fooool. "kwasea" shameless idiot.

see fooool. "kwasea" shameless idiot.
SME 10 years ago

Only in Ghana will a corrupt official have the nerve to sue after being exposed.

Obviously, there is no shame in their game.
Corruption is very deep-rooted in them!!!

Dery's head needs to be bowed in shame with appilog ...
read full comment

Only in Ghana will a corrupt official have the nerve to sue after being exposed.

Obviously, there is no shame in their game.
Corruption is very deep-rooted in them!!!

Dery's head needs to be bowed in shame with appilogies, not lawsuit.

Ghanaians do NOT let these judges off.
Another thing, Anas needs to recover the money they took from him.
The judges and their corrupt followers need to refund every penny back to Anas.

They must be sent to jail and dis-barred/and dis-benched!!!

174 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

Judicial scandal: Indicted Justice Derry sues Anas

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (174)

Read Comments Comments (174)