Hamid sidelined as presidential spokesperson

Read Comments Comments (4)

• Yaw Otchere 8 years ago

  "You have seen nothing yet" keep trying. U shall soon to be told to get out "Ofiri" U can go to Asantenehene house Go ask Razak!

  "You have seen nothing yet" keep trying. U shall soon to be told to get out "Ofiri" U can go to Asantenehene house Go ask Razak!

  reply
• Kofi 8 years ago

  In "Akan Tradition" in Ghana,it is a taboo(forbiden) for an albino (ofiri) to enter the chief's palace so wyhy do you expect Mustapha Hamid who is an albino to be in Nana Addo's cabinet which is his palace?
  In fact if this i ...
  read full comment

  In "Akan Tradition" in Ghana,it is a taboo(forbiden) for an albino (ofiri) to enter the chief's palace so wyhy do you expect Mustapha Hamid who is an albino to be in Nana Addo's cabinet which is his palace?
  In fact if this is not the only reason how can one justify why a whole vibrant Information Minister like this to be standing outside when cabinet meeting is going on?

  reply
• Kotokoliman 8 years ago

  Yes oooo, it is true.....that is Akan belief, if you are an albino (ofiri) you are not allowed to visit a chief...

  Yes oooo, it is true.....that is Akan belief, if you are an albino (ofiri) you are not allowed to visit a chief...

  reply
• John 8 years ago

  NOTORIOUSA NOTORIOUS FOREIGN SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IS WHAT GHANA REALLY NEEDS TO PROSECUTE THE CORRUPT CRIMINALS OF THIS COUNTRY AND EVEN IF POSSIBLE THREE OF SUCH TO DO THE PROSECUTION OF CORRUPT OFFICIALS , THEY SHOULD STRICTL ...
  read full comment

  NOTORIOUSA NOTORIOUS FOREIGN SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IS WHAT GHANA REALLY NEEDS TO PROSECUTE THE CORRUPT CRIMINALS OF THIS COUNTRY AND EVEN IF POSSIBLE THREE OF SUCH TO DO THE PROSECUTION OF CORRUPT OFFICIALS , THEY SHOULD STRICTLY NOT BE GHANAIANS TO BE COWED WITH THREATS OF DEATH FROM OUR PEOPLE . THREE FORIEGN NATIONALS FROM DIFFIRENT COUNTRIES SHOULD BE THE IDEAL TO CARRY OUT THE WORK OF PROSECUTION OF OUR POLITICIANS ..BESIDES , THE INDEMNITY CLAUSE SHOULD BE REMOVED

  reply