This article is closed for comments.
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6) .
.. ...
They found nothing wrong with his behavior because they were in with the corrupt behavior he carried out during the match
CAF saw nothing wrong with the referee on the day??? Like really???.
Eeiiiii, hmmmmmm.
If nothing at all he is at fault for Senegal not having a VAR review of their goal by whistlingtoo early. It's basic for referees not to whistle beca VAR can review the action. Is CAF saying they also passed him correct for s ...
read full comment
@ Folk first of let's understand that Senegal didn't score a goal because he whistled for foul on Achraf Hakimi before the ball entered the back of the net.
On your second point I agree with you that he should have allowed ...
read full comment
You didn't need to repeat what I already indicated. Now to school you on this again, referees are trained, taught, and advised not whistle in such circumstances because VAR can review the play and either award the goal or dis ...
read full comment
VAR can call for a review even after the referee has whistled for an incident if it finds the on-field decision questionable. So, the argument that the ref eas too hasty does not hold. Also, replays of the incident clearly sh ...
read full comment
You are wrong. VAR can only intervene in situations of a red card or a goal. By whistling too early technically no goal was scored. That's why VAR didn't intervene.
CAF's decision on Monsieur Ndala is akin to Ghana where a High Court judge gives a judgement not founded in Ghana law occasioning successful appeals costing the taxpayer and those before the courts thousands of cedis but no ...
read full comment
CAF, a citadel of corruption.
ON WHAT BASES WAS HE CLEARED, THIS IS THE USUAL ATTITUDE OF AFRICAN OFFICIALS IN MISJUDGEMENT TOWARDS THOSE ON OUR SIDES.
It was all planned for morrocco to win that thing guys,and God doesn't like evil...