Menu › ›

Was Mamah really offside? Disallowed Kotoko goal sparks debate

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (12)

  • Dan 2 months ago

    Poor officiating. It was not off side.

  • Alien 2 months ago

    Watch his leg. He was offside

  • Kwadwo 2 months ago

    You need to head to Specsavers then

  • Dan 2 months ago

    Poor officiating. It was not off side.

  • Kojo 2 months ago

    The leg if am right was ahead of the last Hearts player

  • Alien 2 months ago

    Stupid article. How is the decision controversial?

  • Kwadwo 2 months ago

    He was onside

  • Papykwabee 2 months ago

    He was clearly onside. The first Kotoko player was offside, but he wasn’t involved in the action. Mahma was well onside ,two Hearts of Oak players were covering him.

  • CUSTOM has LAUNCHED an online AUCTION of seized VEHICLES , giving everyone in AFRICA the CHANCE to own a VEHICLE at an affordable price. DISTANCES is no OBSTACLE SHIPPING takes place IMMEDIATELY after the order is PLACED . 2 months ago

    A TRIAL WILL CONVINCES YOU
    
    SOME CAR LIST BELOW.
    Golf 3K GHS __ 5K GHS
    
    TOKUNBO CARS BELOW :�
    
    Mitsubishi L200 60,000 GH ...
    read full comment

  • Truth 2 months ago

    Complete goal. The Hearts defenders were caught ball watching. Poor marking

  • Abacha 2 months ago

    It wasn't offside. The referee erred.

  • Gnaby 2 months ago

    At this modern era of football look at the football stadium and pitch even the camera quality is even bad.Ghana nothing is working in this village