This article is closed for comments.
No matter how many pros and cons are generated, the real reason is that the Europeans want to halve the frequency lof player releases for Afcon, but our literal coconut heads, led by Motsepe, can't see that.
Dismiss the idea ...
read full comment
Why not chose middle ground and opt for 3 years?
Two-year AFCON will disrupt the local league. Maintain the four- year cycle.
And your rotten local non-league, where the average attendance is 1,000, is more exciting to you than Afcon?
@Asiedu, you are too generous as the average attendance in the local league is about 500.
Two years is best it brings excitement every two years
And it prepares our players better for the world cup than the quadrennial because of the higher frequency of Afcon.
2 years is the best. It gives players the opportunity to represent their country well.
if CAF's arguing one of the reasons to revert to 4 years is to reduce pressure on players, BUT is still proposing ANOTHER NEW 2 yearly league, that's counterproductive? CAF should maintain the 2 years, players can increas ...
read full comment
EUFA started this agenda that 2 years AFCON normally takes away the African players in the European League and CAF bought into it. Surprisingly EUFA then introduced the Nations League so the their national will be more engage ...
read full comment
Leave it alone, every two years. Stop being dictated to. Has Europe changed hers? Corrupt winnies
Planning an event, concert, program or you have new products in stock that need great advertisements?? Then contact Adverts Ghana for expert digital and social media advertising.
www.advertsghana.com or 0244605868
Copyright © 1994 - 2026 GhanaWeb. All rights reserved.
