Agradaa's husband, Angel Asiamah, was accused of fathering a child outside their marriage
Evangelist Patricia Asiedua Asiamah, popularly known as Nana Agradaa, and her husband, Angel Asiamah, have initiated legal action against a blogger and a woman over what they describe as false and damaging allegations published on social media.
In a statement dated May 5, 2026, issued by Agyaa Asamani Law Consult, the legal representatives of Agradaa and Angel Asiamah confirmed that they have formally petitioned the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) of the Ghana Police Service to investigate the individuals involved in the publication and circulation of the false claims.
The petition urges the CID to look into the matter and establish the facts surrounding a viral video that has been widely shared across social media platforms, including TikTok.
Allegations at the centre of the case
According to the statement, a woman appeared in a widely circulated video on social media, including on a blogger’s TikTok page identified as Katizowao.fv.
She alleged that during the period when Nana Agradaa was imprisoned between July 2025 and March 2026, Angel Asiamah pursued a romantic relationship with her.
She further claimed that Asiamah misrepresented his marital status, impregnated her, and later neglected his parental responsibilities after fathering a child with her.
'Bring the child or face consequences' - Agradaa reacts to Asiamah child allegation
Retraction of the claims
The petition, however, states that the allegations have been proven false.
It notes that in a subsequent video, the woman, together with her brother, publicly retracted her earlier statements and issued an apology to Nana Agradaa and Angel Asiamah.
In the retraction, she admitted that Angel Asiamah is not the father of her child and also stated that she had been influenced to make the initial false claims.
Allegations against the blogger
The legal representatives further accuse the blogger of playing an active role in amplifying the story rather than simply reporting it.
According to the statement, the blogger conducted the interview, repeatedly published similar claims about Angel Asiamah, and used the content to generate online engagement while allegedly damaging the reputations of both Agradaa and her husband.
Harm caused
The petition by Agradaa’s lawyers argues that the publication of these claims has caused severe reputational damage, emotional distress, and public humiliation for the couple.
It also warns that the false statements had the potential to disturb public peace and create fear and alarm among followers and members of the general public.
Relief sought
Agradaa and Angel Asiamah are therefore seeking the following actions from the CID:
1. Commence a formal criminal investigation into the conduct of both the woman and the blogger.
2. Summon and interrogate the woman and the blogger under caution, and record their statements.
3. Secure and preserve all digital evidence, including original videos, republished versions, comments, and any computer files or mobile devices used in the creation and dissemination of the false publication.
4. Charge and prosecute both individuals before a court of competent jurisdiction if the investigation reveals sufficient evidence to establish the offences beyond a reasonable doubt.
5. Consider the woman’s retraction as an admission of falsity, not a bar to prosecution, and use it as corroborating evidence of her knowledge that the statements were untrue. made false statements.
AK/EB
Copyright © 1994 - 2026 GhanaWeb. All rights reserved.
