Referee Abdul Razak Ibrahim cautioned by GFA

Read Comments Comments (2)

• Nice 9 years ago

  Is this not stupidity, according to what is written here all the claims against him is false so why should he be cautioned. To sit up for what? Abaa

  Is this not stupidity, according to what is written here all the claims against him is false so why should he be cautioned. To sit up for what? Abaa

  reply
• Nice 9 years ago

  Is this not stupidity, according to what is written here all the claims against him is false so why should he be cautioned. To sit up for what? Penalty claim wasn't a penalty, the other couldn't be substantiated by u sitting ...
  read full comment

  Is this not stupidity, according to what is written here all the claims against him is false so why should he be cautioned. To sit up for what? Penalty claim wasn't a penalty, the other couldn't be substantiated by u sitting in the confort of ur rooms to determine, then one wasn't captured by camera. A goal which was claimed to be a bad goal was review n saw that it was a good goal, so why is he been cautioned now. To disallow a good goal n give a bad penalty abi?

  reply